| Revision as of 14:50, 30 July 2007 editEyeSerene (talk | contribs)20,213 edits Azusa Street Revival GA review← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:54, 6 August 2007 edit undoEyeSerene (talk | contribs)20,213 edits →[] GA review: Hold almost upNext edit → | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
| You're welcome - you've done a fantastic job on the article so far. I'll look forward to re-reviewing in a few days or so ;) ]''<sup>]</sup>'' 14:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC) | You're welcome - you've done a fantastic job on the article so far. I'll look forward to re-reviewing in a few days or so ;) ]''<sup>]</sup>'' 14:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ===GA review extension almost up=== | |||
| The 'hold' period for ] is almost up, and although you have significantly improved the article, not all points raised in the review have yet been addressed. I will check back again tomorrow for the final assessment. Regards, ]''<sup>]</sup>'' 20:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:54, 6 August 2007
|
Nswinton's Talk Page
|
 Archives |
Newsletter
Y Done. We should get some people to start working on the second one. --(Speak) £ 03:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Most other WikiProjects usually do it monthly. I think this would be good for WP:X too. (Speak) £ 03:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Breaking the rules at WP:X (^_^) I created the work group Outreach. I think we will be able to organize and run everything from there. I was taking a look at some other WikiProjects, and a lot of them have this. They also have welcome templates included in "Outreach" (see WP:WPBIO), so we could move the template user:Wikihermit/Christ into the mainspace area. The whole project has loss momentum, and we need to get it up and running again. (Speak) £ 03:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Will do. The only thing I probably need help with is drumming up some interest in getting the outreach task force going. We probably need about 3-5 Wikipedians to get the next newsletter out. --(Speak) £ 03:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Breaking the rules at WP:X (^_^) I created the work group Outreach. I think we will be able to organize and run everything from there. I was taking a look at some other WikiProjects, and a lot of them have this. They also have welcome templates included in "Outreach" (see WP:WPBIO), so we could move the template user:Wikihermit/Christ into the mainspace area. The whole project has loss momentum, and we need to get it up and running again. (Speak) £ 03:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Azusa Street Revival
i'll be review another chunk for you later today, sorry for the delay... its a veryyyy longgggggg articleeeeeee. but well written :P. MatthewYeager 04:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Cloudinid GA review
Hi there,
Just a quick note to say thanks for your review of the Cloudina article - much appreciated!
All the best,
Verisimilus T 20:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Review Part 2
previously i mentioned much punctuation and overall structure, which should be applied to the whole article. for the rest, i'll try to focus more on readability, style and the sections as they relate to the topic\article.
Yquotes should be quoted: Misplaced Pages:Manual_of_Style#Quotation_marks.
- I believe this if fixed now, please specify if not.
YThere was prayer for, and in, tongues, for the sick, for missionaries, and whatever requests were given by attenders or mailed in. <--awkward
i see you added an image to the William J. Seymour page, but i think that, that needs to be re-written as well. Much information can be put into that article, from this one and then reference to his main article for more information. I think at times sections almost turn into things strictly related to Seymour and not as much on this topic.
Ytitled "Weird Babel of Tongues," a Los Angeles Times reporter a
should be
titled "Weird Babel of Tongues", a Los Angeles Times reporter a
or
titled "Weird Babel of Tongues", a Los Angeles Times reporter a
or
titled "Weird Babel of Tongues", a Los Angeles Times reporter a
with the reference at the end of the sentence.
YI do not believe that the use of ... in the quotes was properly used... i'll have to look into that further. but it is very inconsistent how you use "" here but not above.
- The "..." is part of the direct quote from the source.
transitions from one quote or idea to another need to be strengthen and binded more efficiently.
YIt contained a letter from Charles Parham, an article on Pentecost from Acts, and a series of anecdotes of people's experience within the revival.
not properly referenced
the same years are linked multiple times
YAzusa Street in Pop Culture
* Today a Christian group that plays pop-punk, from Cd. Juarez, Mexico is named "Asuza St." after this revival.
no offense, but is that seriously a section ?
i think the article can still use a second overhaul. weaving ideas together, reducing redundancy and fixing punctuation and style. i think finding a second editor to come through and give it a second set of eyes is prolly best, as well i can image you getting burned out from working on this page so much :P
good luck buddy, let me know if there is anything else i can do. MatthewYeager 23:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
WP:X
Hey how are you doing? I was thinking about WikiProject Christianity, and I think we should do a major revamp of the entire project. On a small note, we need to work on the next newsletter for the project. Drop me a link at my talk page. Thanks! ~ Wikihermit 01:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and put this into the page. ~ Wikihermit 03:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
cleanup involution task
Hi,
myles324a here. I’ve had a bit of time, so I’m going thru the cleanup list, and seeing what I can do. I’ve had a fair bit of experience proofreading and editing, and I thought to bring it to bear on some of these entries. I’m basically a newbie, so maybe you can point me in the right direction. I have an amateur interest in philosophical / metaphysical and scientific topics, and I agree with your assessment that involution entry is just about done. It pretty much is what it is, anyway? How far can you go with this sort of stuff anyway? And it would be good to see some of these articles OFF the cleanup list. I’m going to give it a once-over and then put it in for decertification. (How do you do that?) There are a couple of awkward and confusing sentence constructions, and I don’t hold with e.g.s and i.e’s in formal text of this kind. What is the policy there? I will post my queries on the discussion page and here, if you want me to. Myles325a 04:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Ok, myles back here. I've now finished work on Involution:Philosopy. I think it can be taken off Cleanup. Myles325a 06:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Azusa Street Revival GA review
You're welcome - you've done a fantastic job on the article so far. I'll look forward to re-reviewing in a few days or so ;) EyeSerene 14:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
GA review extension almost up
The 'hold' period for Azusa Street Revival is almost up, and although you have significantly improved the article, not all points raised in the review have yet been addressed. I will check back again tomorrow for the final assessment. Regards, EyeSerene 20:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)