Revision as of 21:38, 9 August 2007 editRichardWeiss (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users75,870 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:40, 9 August 2007 edit undoRockpocket (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,891 edits please stopNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Your deletions== | ==Your deletions== | ||
You are right we all have to obey the same rules. So do not delete my comments from someone else's talk page, ] 21:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | You are right we all have to obey the same rules. So do not delete my comments from someone else's talk page, ] 21:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
: This is not acceptable. Please stop now or I will take action to stop you from continuing to harass Vk. He has made it very clear he does not wish to continue this discussion with you. ]<font color="black">e</font>] 21:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:40, 9 August 2007
Vintagekits
Hello. New editors don't typically turn up and immediately contribute to unblock discussions. This strongly suggests you are an editors with a history of interaction with Vk. While you have the right to editing anonymously if you wish, considering the circumstances, it is entirely reasonable for Vk to decline to interact with you.
Your query about Arbcom has been addressed and Vk is now unblocked, so the point is perhaps moot. If there is anything else you would like to say on the subject, then feel free to do so on my talkpage, but please obey Vk's wishes to stop editing on his talk page. Thanks. Rockpocket 21:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Your deletions
You are right we all have to obey the same rules. So do not delete my comments from someone else's talk page, SqueakBox 21:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- This is not acceptable. Please stop now or I will take action to stop you from continuing to harass Vk. He has made it very clear he does not wish to continue this discussion with you. Rockpocket 21:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)