| Revision as of 21:54, 9 August 2007 edit84.13.156.208 (talk) →Your deletions: == Vintagekits == Why is it edit warring by me to ask civil and pertinent questions?← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:01, 9 August 2007 edit undo84.13.156.208 (talk) →Your deletionsNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Why is it edit warring by me to ask civil and pertinent questions? | Why is it edit warring by me to ask civil and pertinent questions? | ||
| Why have you now even censored the whole history of several weeks of contributions on Vintagekits talk page? | |||
| == Vintagekits == | == Vintagekits == | ||
Revision as of 22:01, 9 August 2007
Vintagekits
Hello. New editors don't typically turn up and immediately contribute to unblock discussions. This strongly suggests you are an editors with a history of interaction with Vk. While you have the right to editing anonymously if you wish, considering the circumstances, it is entirely reasonable for Vk to decline to interact with you.
Your query about Arbcom has been addressed and Vk is now unblocked, so the point is perhaps moot. If there is anything else you would like to say on the subject, then feel free to do so on my talkpage, but please obey Vk's wishes to stop editing on his talk page. Thanks. Rockpocket 21:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Your deletions
You are right we all have to obey the same rules. So do not delete my comments from someone else's talk page, SqueakBox 21:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- This is not acceptable. Please stop now or I will take action to stop you from continuing to harass Vk. He has made it very clear he does not wish to continue this discussion with you. Rockpocket 21:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Why is it edit warring by me to ask civil and pertinent questions?
Why have you now even censored the whole history of several weeks of contributions on Vintagekits talk page?
Vintagekits
Hello. New editors don't typically turn up and immediately contribute to unblock discussions. This strongly suggests you are an editors with a history of interaction with Vk. While you have the right to editing anonymously if you wish, considering the circumstances, it is entirely reasonable for Vk to decline to interact with you.
Your query about Arbcom has been addressed and Vk is now unblocked, so the point is perhaps moot. If there is anything else you would like to say on the subject, then feel free to do so on my talkpage, but please obey Vk's wishes to stop editing on his talk page. Thanks. Rockpocket 21:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hello.
- But I am not a new editor.
- Where editors wish to contribute anonymously and have a good reason (eg: harassment) they are permitted, provided they are civil, to do so.
- Why does Vkits get this extreme level of censorship permission?
- Why does he not wish to communicate with me?
Your deletions
You are right we all have to obey the same rules. So do not delete my comments from someone else's talk page, SqueakBox 21:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- That was my mistake for which I humbly apologise.
- It was not deliberate but accidental when huge chunks of your comments (and those of other editors were deleted). I am surprised that you do not deprecate blanking user pages and selectively (and intentionally) removing comments from other editors.