Revision as of 12:11, 14 September 2003 edit217.168.172.157 (talk) clarification concerning Hermite← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:13, 14 September 2003 edit undoBogdangiusca (talk | contribs)39,816 edits also called euler's numberNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
] | ] | ||
The ] <math>e</math> (occasionally called ''Napier's constant'' in honor of the Scottish ] ] who introduced ]) is the base of the ]. It is approximately equal to | The ] <math>e</math> (occasionally called ''Euler's number'' or ''Napier's constant'' in honor of the Scottish ] ] who introduced ]) is the base of the ]. It is approximately equal to | ||
: ''e'' = 2.71828 18284 59045 23536 02874 ... | : ''e'' = 2.71828 18284 59045 23536 02874 ... | ||
Revision as of 12:13, 14 September 2003
The constant (occasionally called Euler's number or Napier's constant in honor of the Scottish mathematician John Napier who introduced logarithms) is the base of the natural logarithm. It is approximately equal to
- e = 2.71828 18284 59045 23536 02874 ...
It is equal to exp(1) where exp is the exponential function and therefore it is the limit
and can also be written as the infinite series
Here stands for the factorial of .
The number e is relevant because one can show that the exponential function exp(x) can be written as ; the exponential function is important because it is, up to multiplication by a scalar, the unique function which is its own derivative and is hence commonly used to model growth or decay processes.
The number e is known to be irrational and even transcendental. It was the first number to be proved transcendental without having been specifically constructed; the proof was given by Charles Hermite in 1873. It is conjectured to be normal. It features (along with a few other fundamental constants) in Euler's identity:
which was described by Richard Feynman as "The most remarkable formula in mathematics"!
The infinite continued fraction expansion of contains an interesting pattern as follows:
The apparent iregularity at the beginning disappears if one rewrites the fraction as: