| Revision as of 15:02, 31 August 2007 editPerfect Proposal (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,598 edits →Discussion← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:15, 31 August 2007 edit undoOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits →Discussion: NoNext edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| #'''Oppoose and ask for withdrawl''' I'm sorry - normally I would like to offer at least a moral support but by doing nothing for months on the project and then requesting Adminship the moment you start editing again is, frankly, disrespectful to the nature of RFA and to other editors. I'm sorry. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] | ] </span></small> 14:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC) | #'''Oppoose and ask for withdrawl''' I'm sorry - normally I would like to offer at least a moral support but by doing nothing for months on the project and then requesting Adminship the moment you start editing again is, frankly, disrespectful to the nature of RFA and to other editors. I'm sorry. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] | ] </span></small> 14:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| #'''Oppose''' I'm quite worried about the answers to the questions, and the recent incidents at ] don't help very much either. It is unlikely this will pass, it seems like ] to me. <font face="Impact">] <sup>]</sup></font> 15:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''' I'm quite worried about the answers to the questions, and the recent incidents at ] don't help very much either. It is unlikely this will pass, it seems like ] to me. <font face="Impact">] <sup>]</sup></font> 15:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| #'''Oppose''' No experience. This should be withdrawn per ]. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 15:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| '''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
Revision as of 15:15, 31 August 2007
Pupster21
Voice your opinion (talk page) (0/4/0); Scheduled to end 12:10, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Pupster21 (talk · contribs) - I have been inactive as of late, but this time I have come back with more experience and a more mature personality. Pupster21 Talk To Me 12:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A:I am more leaning to be a support admin this time. I would say that I would probably try to end backlogs and try to keep a sharp eye on images and articles for copyright violations. I have thought since my last Rfa and now I know what an admin needs to do.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why?
- A:Once again, my best contributions are through many WikiProjects and are very subtle. Yes, I know that I have made many controversial edits but I think that my overall contribs can make up. Unlike last time, now the articles that I work on I try to cite properly. I still maintain from my last Rfa, that my best contribution is WP:YANKS.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:Now I have been involved in an edit war truly and I see that negotiations come first, blocking comes second.
General comments
- See Pupster21's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
- Links for Pupster21: Pupster21 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Pupster21 before commenting.
Discussion
Support
Oppose
- Oppose Your comments in the last three AfDs you participated in were "Delete, have no clue what the heck it is", "Keep An OK article that deserves to stay until he is signed to a pro team" and "Keep, a funny article that covers a concept". Although, ironically, the consensus went with you on each occasion (albeit for different reasons), this seems to demonstrate a serious lack of understanding of policy in what's probably the most important admin area. Also, you seem very inactive - aside from this RfA, you only have one Misplaced Pages-space edit since the beginning of June — iridescent (talk to me!) 12:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose and suggest withdrawl this will probably not pass, you're borderline experience wise, but not even touching on your extremely weak chance of passing RFA by your comments and actions alone, you've had practically no time to improve since your last RFA, especially considering you've barely edited in the past three months, you've definitely not come far enough since your last RFA to be here again --lucid 13:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Three months complete inactivity followed by filing your 2nd RfA 30 minutes after returning does not sit well with me. Very weak answers to RfA questions, which was a frequent criticism in your previous RfA, but you made no effort to improve your responses here. Maralia 13:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oppoose and ask for withdrawl I'm sorry - normally I would like to offer at least a moral support but by doing nothing for months on the project and then requesting Adminship the moment you start editing again is, frankly, disrespectful to the nature of RFA and to other editors. I'm sorry. Pedro | Chat 14:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm quite worried about the answers to the questions, and the recent incidents at WP:AfD don't help very much either. It is unlikely this will pass, it seems like WP:SNOW to me. Perfect Proposal 15:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose No experience. This should be withdrawn per WP:SNOW. OrangeMarlin 15:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Neutral