Misplaced Pages

Slavocracy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:04, 27 February 2007 editBabij (talk | contribs)235 editsm Undid revision 111202594 by 208.163.32.17 (talk)← Previous edit Revision as of 19:56, 13 September 2007 edit undoSmackBot (talk | contribs)3,734,324 edits Add references section (testing) and/or general fixes.Next edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


A number of early European ] in the ] were largely plantocracies, usually consisting of a small European settler population relying on a predominantly West African ] slave population (as well as smaller numbers of indentured ]s, both European and non-European in origin), and later, "freed"-Black and poor-white ]s for labour. These plantocracies proved to be a decisive force in the ] movement. One prominent organization largely representing (and collectively funded by) a number of plantocracies was the ''] Lobby'' in the ]. It is credited (or conversely, discredited) in constituting a significant impetus in delaying the Abolition of the Slave Trade from taking place in the ] to being implemented in 1806-1808; and likewise, with respect to prospects of Emancipation being proclaimed in the ] (instead, a policy known as ''Amelioration'' was formally adopted throughout ]-]), to it being implemented in ]-]. A number of early European ] in the ] were largely plantocracies, usually consisting of a small European settler population relying on a predominantly West African ] slave population (as well as smaller numbers of indentured ]s, both European and non-European in origin), and later, "freed"-Black and poor-white ]s for labour. These plantocracies proved to be a decisive force in the ] movement. One prominent organization largely representing (and collectively funded by) a number of plantocracies was the ''] Lobby'' in the ]. It is credited (or conversely, discredited) in constituting a significant impetus in delaying the Abolition of the Slave Trade from taking place in the ] to being implemented in 1806-1808; and likewise, with respect to prospects of Emancipation being proclaimed in the ] (instead, a policy known as ''Amelioration'' was formally adopted throughout ]-]), to it being implemented in ]-].



* B.W. Higman. "The West India Interest in Parliament," ''Historical Studies'' (1967), 13: pp. 1-19. * B.W. Higman. "The West India Interest in Parliament," ''Historical Studies'' (1967), 13: pp. 1-19.

Revision as of 19:56, 13 September 2007

Template:Noncompliant

A plantocracy, also known as a slavocracy''', is a ruling class, political order or government comprised of (or dominated by) plantation owners.

A number of early European colonies in the New World were largely plantocracies, usually consisting of a small European settler population relying on a predominantly West African chattel slave population (as well as smaller numbers of indentured slaves, both European and non-European in origin), and later, "freed"-Black and poor-white sharecroppers for labour. These plantocracies proved to be a decisive force in the anti-abolitionist movement. One prominent organization largely representing (and collectively funded by) a number of plantocracies was the West Indies Lobby in the British Parliament. It is credited (or conversely, discredited) in constituting a significant impetus in delaying the Abolition of the Slave Trade from taking place in the 1790s to being implemented in 1806-1808; and likewise, with respect to prospects of Emancipation being proclaimed in the 1820s (instead, a policy known as Amelioration was formally adopted throughout 1823-1833), to it being implemented in 1834-1838.

  • B.W. Higman. "The West India Interest in Parliament," Historical Studies (1967), 13: pp. 1-19.
  • See the historical journal: Plantation Society in the Americas for a host of pertinent articles.
  • Steel, Mark James (PhD Dissertation). Power, Prejudice and Profit: the World View of the Jamaican Slaveowning Elite, 1788-1834, (University of Liverpool Press, Liverpool 1988).
  • Luster, Robert Edward (PhD Dissertation). The Amelioration of the Slaves in the British Empire, 1790-1833 (New York University Press, 1998).
  1. Bicheno, Hugh (2003). Rebels and Redcoats: The American Revolutionary War. London: Harper Collins. pp. passim. ISBN 0-00-715625-1.
Slavocracy: Difference between revisions Add topic