Revision as of 10:14, 27 September 2007 editAllstarecho (talk | contribs)Rollbackers41,096 editsm Reverted to revision 160661058 by Jmlk17. using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:10, 27 September 2007 edit undo222.252.230.6 (talk) →BarnstarNext edit → | ||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your wonderful anti-vandal work. It is always a pleasure to see your reports at AIV, as I know the proper warnings have already been issued, and a block is warranted. Much easier on us admins! ]]] 09:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC) | |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your wonderful anti-vandal work. It is always a pleasure to see your reports at AIV, as I know the proper warnings have already been issued, and a block is warranted. Much easier on us admins! ]]] 09:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Please do not acuse people wrongly == | |||
{{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Frige|, such as the one you made to ],}} did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> -- ] ] 09:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make any ] edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.'' | |||
Do you know what you are talking about? Why saying "Friia" and "Frea" are variant names of ] is VANDALISM? | |||
Read ]! | |||
"Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages. | |||
The most common types of vandalism include the addition of obscenities to pages, page blanking, or the insertion of jokes or nonsense. Fortunately, these types of vandalism are usually easy to spot. | |||
Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Misplaced Pages. For example, adding a personal opinion once is not vandalism—it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated." | |||
My addition is not wrong, and it is clearly a good-faith effort. | |||
And read this! ]. You labeled me as vandal for NO REASON! | |||
] 11:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:10, 27 September 2007
Warning to Vandals: This user is equipped with Lupin's Anti-vandal tool. |
This user reverts vandalism in the blink of an eye with Twinkle! |
Say what's on your mind!Click here to leave me a message I will reply on this page unless you request otherwise. Hi!-- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC) Welcome to WikiProject LGBT studies!
Welcome to the Article Rescue SquadronGreetings and welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! Please browse Articles for Deletion periodically, and help fix any articles flagged for rescue that you can. If you have any questions please let me know. Fosnez 02:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC) Crocker date or place of birth, Please StopYour edits although well-intentioned to the Chris Crocker article are a blatant violation of Do No Harm policy. Please read up on WP:Bio. The subject of the article has received death threats and has worked to retain a level of anonymity. Your addition of date/place of birth can risk their safety as well as anyone perceived to be them. Benjiboi 12:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC) Ed FordhamHi, ASE! Regarding Ed Fordham, I'm pretty sure someone's blog isn't considered a reliable source. Furthermore, the blog says that he wants to remain closeted. So unless we can find a good source, we should probably remove that reference and the LGBT cat/info. Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 14:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Re:Patricia SoltysikWho defines SLA as a terrorist organization? It was more of an anarchist organization, if anything. -- ALLSTAR ECHO 14:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Patricia Soltysik not a person?Now why do you keep removing the bio tag? -- Esemono 14:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Nice signitureIt reminds me of mine! Yes, this is random, but I just had to say it.. THROUGH FIRE JUSTICE IS SERVED! 11:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Nicely done!Thanks for the two B's you did on our list - nicely done :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 13:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
That last Donna Ladd edit... seems to say she's drawing condemnation from her biggest fans...? (It also seems to be verging on a NPOV violation, with strong unsourced implications of hypocrisy.) --Orange Mike 20:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
September 11, 2001 attacks in popular cultureHello, I am the editor who created an afd for the above article. I notice that you have closed it, however, discussion for it was just barely getting started. I think you have closed it, rather early. It would be nice to hear from the larger community. I don't feel merging is the answer. These popular culture listing get extremely lengthy, and it is difficult to source each one of them. Please consider opening it again. Fighting for Justice 06:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
WarningsPlease don't revert without leaving the vandal a message. Reverting is not as important as letting the user know he was reverted for vandalizing. — Moe ε 14:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC) Why did you revert Best Revenge edits?You didn't leave any reason for reverting the additional information and picture that I added to the Best Revenge article this morning. What gives? - Mackaye 9:57 September 25, 2007 (PST)
Copyright ViolationsMisplaced Pages takes copyright seriously. Please do not post copyrighted text. Also, please do not remove copyvio tags from articles without fixing the problems as you did here and here. I have removed the text that was a direct copy from these two articles. If you wish to rewrite the content in your own words, you are welcome to do so. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 22:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
PresentI'm pretty sure the copyright for the picture does not let me do this, but here ya go :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 03:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Great work!
Barnstar
Please do not acuse people wronglyWelcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Frige, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- ALLSTAR ECHO 09:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Do you know what you are talking about? Why saying "Friia" and "Frea" are variant names of Freya is VANDALISM? Read WP:Vandalism! "Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages. The most common types of vandalism include the addition of obscenities to pages, page blanking, or the insertion of jokes or nonsense. Fortunately, these types of vandalism are usually easy to spot. Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Misplaced Pages. For example, adding a personal opinion once is not vandalism—it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated." My addition is not wrong, and it is clearly a good-faith effort. And read this! Criticism_of_Wikipedia#Abuse_of_power. You labeled me as vandal for NO REASON! |