| Revision as of 02:32, 1 November 2007 editBishopicof (talk | contribs)82 edits →International Circle of Faith← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:43, 1 November 2007 edit undoSomeguy1221 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators41,264 edits commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| *'''delete''' - ] and ]. ] 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC) | *'''delete''' - ] and ]. ] 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| This article is no different that similar articles for other Christian denominations. There is certainly many refernces, links and the names read like the who's who of this groups particular segment of Christiandome. The fact that a member of the group contributed as a writer of the article does not take away from it's credibility. | This article is no different that similar articles for other Christian denominations. There is certainly many refernces, links and the names read like the who's who of this groups particular segment of Christiandome. The fact that a member of the group contributed as a writer of the article does not take away from it's credibility.{{unsigned|Bishopicof}} | ||
| *'''Comment.''' The problem is that there is no evidence of ], and the sources given are all ], which do not help in establishing notability. ] 02:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:43, 1 November 2007
International Circle of Faith
Contested PROD. I have been unable to locate reliable sources suggesting notability of the organization or any of its individual members. This article was also created by a member of the organization, based on the username. Someguy1221 00:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't assert notability, COI as noted above, serves as soapbox. faithless () 00:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- delete - WP:OR and WP:VSCA. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
This article is no different that similar articles for other Christian denominations. There is certainly many refernces, links and the names read like the who's who of this groups particular segment of Christiandome. The fact that a member of the group contributed as a writer of the article does not take away from it's credibility.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bishopicof (talk • contribs)
- Comment. The problem is that there is no evidence of notability, and the sources given are all primary sources, which do not help in establishing notability. Someguy1221 02:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)