Revision as of 23:47, 17 December 2007

The Powerpuff Girls received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Television Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1, Debate Archive

Help

Please, there's someone who can help me to put at Trivia's section that Bubbles's toy (a purple yellow-eyed octopus) appeared in the cartoon The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy, at the episode Crawling Niceness? If you saw the episode, you can confirm. It's because I'm Brazilian and I don't want to write this information with any language error. Thanks. Brazilian Man 02:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Separate articles and new navigation template idea

I have ideas about What should have their article and how the navigation template should look like:_{(If you can't see, click .)}

Above table is called {{PPG}}.

List to create:

• Bubbles (The Powerpuff Girls)
• Blossom (The Powerpuff Girls
• Buttercup (The Powerpuff Girls)
• Mayor of Townsville
• Sara Bellum
• Ms. Keane
• Fuzzy Lumpkins
• Him (The Powerpuff Girls)
• The Amoeba Boys
• The Whoopass Girls
• Twas the Fight Before Christmas

And Sedusa (Powerpuff Girls) should renamed to "Sedusa".--JSH-alive_{see my works} 08:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Please discuss more. You can edit the above table. Then, create the template.

Also, I have separate article ideas for PPGZ. Here is the list to create:

• Momoko Akatsutsumi Treats Momoko Akatsutsumi/Hyper Blossom
• Miyako Goutokuji Treats Miyako Goutokuji/Rolling Bubbles
• Kaoru Matsubara Treats Kaoru Matsubara/Powered Buttercup
• Ken Kitazawa Treats Ken Kitazawa, the 8 year-old son of Professor Utonium and his pet robot dog, Peach.
• Himeko Shirogane Treats Himeko Shirogane/Princess-sama as well as her pet cat, Sapphire.
• Should Kuriko Akatsutsumi, a younger sister of Momoko Akatsutsumi, have her article? Discuss here.

It's not the end. Because I have more ideas:

• Create a section titled In other media in the article Professor Utonium, then, treat Professor Utonium in the PPGZ in that section.
• Create a section titled In other media in the article Mayor of Townsville, then, treat Mayor of Tokyo City in the PPGZ in that section.
• Create a section titled In other media in the article Sara Bellum, then, treat Miss Bellum in the PPGZ in that section.
• Create a section titled In other media in the article Ms. Keane, then, treat Miss Keane in the PPGZ in that section.
• Create a section titled In other media in the article Sedusa (Powerpuff Girls), then, treat Sakurako Kintoki/Sedusa in that section.
• Create a section titled In other media in the articles about major villains (Mojo Jojo, Fuzzy Lumpkins, Him (The Powerpuff Girls), Gangreen Gang, Rowdyruff Boys, The Amoeba Boys), then, treat them in the PPGZ in that section in each article.

A PPGZ navigation template idea is coming soon.--JSH-alive_{see my works} 07:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

And now! Here's a PPGZ navigation template idea, named {{PPGZ}}:_{(If you can't see, click .)}

And, can someone describe PPG comics on the article The Powerpuff Girls and PPGZ manga on the article Demashita! Powerpuff Girls Z?--JSH-alive _{see my works} 06:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

What a waste of time, to dedicate all of this to a fairly minor animated series. Also, the Powerpuff Girls deserve no recognition after they beat up an innocent clown. My suggestion is to dump this idea, as it is wasted. Marcus2 12:42, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, if it violates Misplaced Pages:Notability (fiction)... --May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) 18:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I completely disagree with Marcus2's comments. The Powerpuff Girls themselves are major characters in the series, and many of the villains are also well-known. Many other series (such as Power Rangers and The Fairly OddParents) have their own articles on characters, and I don't see why PPG shouldn't have individual articles on major characters. Andros 1337 14:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

While the villains are major characters in the series, they are NOT well known AT ALL. After the girls beat up Rainbow the Clown, there is no reason to recognize them or praise and laud them. Marcus2 15:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but where did Andros 1337 say anything about Rainbow the clown? --May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) 15:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I never stated anything about Rainbow the Clown. However, every MAJOR villain (including Fuzzy Lumpkins and Him) should have their own article. And of course, the heroes of the series (Blossom, Bubbles, and Buttercup) are worthy having individual articles, similarly to how many of the Power Rangers have their own. Andros 1337 00:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Now, here's the El Cid-ish version of my previous idea:

• {{PPG}}

• {{PPGZ}}

--JSH-alive _{see my works} 08:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

correction needed

The animation director is Genndy Tartakovsky, of Dexter's Laboratory and Samurai Jack fame, who has also directed many of the shows themselves.

I can't correct this as the sentence doesn't make sense however much you juggle the words about - has something been taken out? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.112.64.146 (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC).

Image in the infobox

Instead of Image:Powerpuffg.gif, how about this:

http://ppgcom.gooside.com/ppgz/ppgzop2/ppg04.jpg

It is included in http://ppgcom.gooside.com/ppgz/ppgzop2/index.html , the page explaining cultural references in the PPGZ's second opening sequence.--JSH-alive _{see my works} 06:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm all for it, it looks much better than the cuttent one. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) 12:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Disagree Nope, the current one is transparent, and also has a good image quality. I see no reason to change it. δσώпҹ 12:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure, the new one seems much closer to the original opening, though now that I think about it, in the end both would work well, as they essentially show what's intended to be shown. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) 12:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

minor characters

The PPG article has become to long, and i propose we either delete or, preferably, create a separate article for the list of minor characters. What do you think? Rattis1 17:40, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I had a simliar thought. But I think that the villains should have their own page; that's the longest segment of the article, I think. HyperBlossom 18:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Is there really a need for mentioning characters, which made only one appearance in the series? They're usually crucial only to the episodes they appeared in. Why not just mention them in the respective episode's description? No need for any new articles in my oppinion. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) 19:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I might agree --- if there were individual episode descriptions. Of course, I could always write them . . . HyperBlossom 19:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

There is already a List of The Powerpuff Girls episodes with short episode descriptions. One could either write a lengthier summary of the episode plots there, or create separete pages for each episode (after all, there are plenty of other shows that has individual pages for each induvidual episode). Anyway, i think i will go ahead and delete the "guest villains" segement from this article now. Rattis1 19:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes, my original idea was actually merging one-timers into those episode descriptions. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) 20:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

There's also plenty of shows that maintain lists of one-off characters. Granted the article needs to be pruned, but I think the information should be retained. HyperBlossom 20:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Uuh, could you try not to delete my comments, please. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) 20:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry. We must have been editing at the same time. HyperBlossom 20:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I created Minor characters of the Powerpuff Girls. There might be a few more characters, not just one-offs, that belong there. SchmuckyTheCat 20:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Article assessment

It's too early for such a statement. The article has to have a review first. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) 20:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

No Picture...

Why are there pictures of the minor characters but NONE of the actual main characters? Could someone fix this? Wikipeep 494 05:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Look at the box at the most bottom. Click on "The Powerpuff Girls" for example. You can see them yours truly. They even have their Japanese counterparts, Kawaii! Blossom's Japanese Counterpart is Momoko Akatsutsumi, Bubbles's is Miyako Gotokuji and Buttercup's is Kaoru Matsubara. Love is most Important to those who cannot depend on themselves. 14:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I agree that the main article needs atleast ONE picture of the main characters. What about that one picture that used to be on the right-top of the page, where thay where all in bed? Could someone find that picture and but it back? Rattis1 08:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I wish that could happen because before "Marco" messes things up, I saw the picture of the Powerpuff Girls in their pajamas in bed with the Professor which could be a scene of the episode "BOOGIE FRIGHT". Heh, heh. Ain't I a Great PPG Fan? Love is most Important to those who cannot depend on themselves. 13:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes, this is rather strange. It seems that there should be a picture of the Powerpuff Girls on the Powerpuff Girls page. --04:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.101.231 (talk)

PPG in pop culture

A list of times a certain TV show, movie, book or whatever has ben mentioned in other media is common place here on wikipedia (just look at the article on Beavis and butthead, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, My Little Pony, or just about anything popular or well-known). So Marcus belief that the article on The Powerpuff Girls should NOT have one of those lists have no basis at all. However, no article can truely be a good article if it has to many lists, so i propose we delete the list that mention times the the PPG show has made references to other cultural phenonomen. The "overview" section at the begining of the article alreday thats that the show "bases much of its humor on pop culture parody" (or something like that), and i dont think its necassery to mention every single parody the show has made. Other shows which frequently makes parodys does not have such a list (Simpsons, South Park, Rugrats ect). So im gonna go ahead and delete the "cultural references" section and instead put back the "Powerpuff Girls in Pop Culture" section. That ok with the rest of you? Rattis1 09:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Wait, i just found out that there had been talks about deleting the "cultural references section" before, but people woted aginst it. Oh well, i guess i will llet it stay then. But i will still but back the "in Pop Culture" section. Rattis1 10:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Him

Why doesn't that powerful demon have his own page? After all he had huge number of appearance. TheBlazikenMaster 17:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, there was. But it is gone. I'm sure it will be back one day. Night Leon 06:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Split Characters into Completely Seperate Article

The main one is getting very crowded, perhaps moving every character description into a seperate article, perhaps merging Minor characters of the Powerpuff Girls with it. At the moment it's a bit messy, with descriptions all over the place. Hurball 09:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

That's not the only one though. Possibly I'm not the only one who needs the Cultural, Media and other References. I'm suggesting that someone and I mean anyone except and I mean EXCEPT MARCUS do put the Powerpuff Girls Cultural and many other References having their own pages like a link the way that the Main Powerpuff Girls Characters do. Holla! Night Leon 06:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Adding the Japanese Voice Cast, Plus Information on Japanese Dub.

While PowerPuff Girls is an american cartoon and creation, there is the fact it ended up spinning off into a japanese animation series. Because of this, I was wondering if anyone would object for me to add information about the Japanese dub of the PowerPuff Girls here on this English Misplaced Pages entry, including the voice actors? Is there any objection to this? Mendinso 19:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

If you're talking about the anime series (PPG Z), that's got it's own page (see the navbar at the bottom of the page), and that shouldn't be added. However, if you're talking about the Japanese VAs used for original PPG show (which I'm not aware that it was aired and dubbed in Japan), then that's reasonable information to add. --Masem 19:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Revival

Just yesterday I saw one of the promos for Fried Dynamite. It was the one where a bunch of pictures flash in front of the screen in the beginning before the guy holding his breath. In one of the quick flashes I saw a picture of mojo jojo. If you see this commercial, try to find him, he is in the top right corner of the screen. Its very quick but definetly noticeable. Ive been trying to find it on the web but nothing. Anyway, why would they have mojo jojo in Fried Dynamite if the show was cancelled long ago. Something to think about?? 24.186.101.182 18:37, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Friend Dynamite? I'll try watching it. I'm not letting out my ------------ of -------- I'll do so. Then if it really has Mojo Jojo, it would go to the "References in the Other Media" in my view. Night Leon 03:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey! It's true! I found such thing. I did see a Mojo Jojo Poster or something like a Poster like that. That kid did not mention about the Powerpuff Girls but about other shows like Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends or Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy and even Camp Lazlo. Holla "User: Number"! You're good! Night Leon 03:55, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

It's definetly there, but seeing as there has been no announcement for new ppf episodes, or for reruns to come on once more, the question is WHY would it be on the block?? Craig McCracken is still working on Foster's, but then again you can consider that ppf doesnt air on boomerang yet, meaning there's a chance that foster's will soon be cancelled and ppf will start airing once more, ppf will have reruns, or that a new team will work on ppf while mccracken continues to work on foster's. Man thats a handful. 71.191.35.179 15:29, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Not all countries have the Best American Cartoon ever officially cancelled you know. I don't want to state which one. And FHFIF will never be cancelled just yet like the Powerpuff Girls in my view. I respect Craig McCracken because he is the True owner of the Powerpuff Girls and the new series called Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends. If that Fried Dynamite promotion is around 2006 to 2007, it doesn't mean that the poster of Mojo Jojo or anything to do with the Powerpuff Girls can't still be there just because the show was officially cancelled in some countries. Why must they cancel it? It could be because we didn't give enough ratings and a lot of adults complained about the PPG: Movie and also, we didn't buy a lot of the products currently. I convinced my friends to buy the products if they care about Powerpuff and they did. The Powerpuff Girls are now still having their own episodes and in Chunky Toons in other countries. I am looking forward to Milky Way and the Galaxy Girls which resemble the Powerpuff Girls as well. And more importantly, the Powerpuff Girls will have something soon which I don't want to state what until I can get my hands on it as soon as it gets to my country. Well, if it ever gets to my country. Nevertheless, I'm one of the Great Powerpuff Girls Fan no matter what. Night Leon 05:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Night Leon (talk • contribs).

Non-free images

You need to remove the images from the character list, this usage is considered decorative and fails the fair-use criteria. Guy (Help!) 14:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Profesor Utonium.JPG

Image:Profesor Utonium.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

For those in the back...

Copied from the ongoing (but very minimally commented on) peer review for this article:

Review by Midnightdreary I don't think this article is ready for GA just yet, though I don't know what the standards are from the WP:Cartoon Network. Here's my two cents...

• The intro can be expanded on. As per WP:LEAD, it should serve as a stand-alone mini-article.

• Overview: I would suggest putting the Setting section as a subsection of this, as well as the info on the opening/closing sequences. The line "The show is one in a long line of cartoons that derives a great deal of humor from pop culture parody and satire" is original research. The line "It has a highly stylized, minimalistic visual look, reminiscent of 1950s and 1960s pop art" should have a cited source for a similar reason.

• History: This is the article's strongest section, simply because it has so many sources. Keep looking for more and see if you can expand (see my last note, too).

• Characters: I'd consider having a separate article for the main characters and only putting very brief information here. There's already a "Minor characters of the Powerpuff Girls" article, which may suggest room for a "Major characters" article. Editors may notice if this section is removed, there's not much left in the article (see my last note! :).

• Episodes: I'd consider taking off the bullet-style and just sticking with a single paragraph of prose here. Think about it, anyway.

• I'm not an expert on TV articles here on Misplaced Pages, but I think right away that the whole article is sorely in need of more out-of-universe discussion. I think, say, production of the series and critical response should be a pretty weighty part of the article. For this one in particular, I'm sure you'll find information on its popularity, merchandising, etc. You have some information under "History" which could be expanded on. Make sure you've taken a look at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Television/How to write about television programs and consider the article on Sesame Street (a featured article) as a sort of guide. Notice how many sources that article has (I'm guessing, though, that Sesame Street has a few more readily available sources; you might have to put some extra work in). Throughout this article, avoid single-sentence paragraphs. My suggestion is that all paragraphs should have at least three sentences; that's just good prose. Well, anyway, I hope I was helpful. Best of luck to any dedicated editors on this article! --Midnightdreary 19:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Well? Stop the in-fighting and improve the damn thing! --treelo _talk 13:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:MayorTownsville.JPG

Image:MayorTownsville.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Talkingdogpolice.JPG

Image:Talkingdogpolice.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Gangreengang.JPG

Image:Gangreengang.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Princess-tada!.jpg

Image:Princess-tada!.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Fuzzy-mad.jpg

Image:Fuzzy-mad.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:32, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

The article

I'm glad to see that our argument has been somewhat settled and stored into a debate archive here. There are a few flaws made to the article here and there, but otherwise, I think this article is good the way it is. If there aren't any inappropriate edits here other than vandalism (there will always be vandalism, as far as I'm concerned), I think the article is pretty much fine, unless there is some good proof that new things related to "The Powerpuff Girls" are happening. Marcus2 (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

The ratings and popularity section is back again.

That's right. There was never a consensus among the editors of this page to remove the sentences about the ratings of the show, they were only removed by one single user. I did'nt bother fighting back and put the sentences back that time, since i felt i had to many other, more important, tasks on my hands. But now that i have some free time for a while, i am going to set a few things straight here. And those few sentences concerning the popularity of the show i wrote several months ago WILL stay in the article. They are suported by three perfectly valid sources, which is more than you can say about similar statements about most shows (such as, for instance, the "Fairly Oddparents" article, which merely states that "Other than SpongeBob SquarePants, it was later Nickelodeon's most highly rated show." withuot any reference at all).

Now, if anyone has any complaints about this edit, then let us discuss it i a civil manner right here on this talk page. Rattis1 (talk) 18:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Go back to the debate archive and find out what the agreement was. The sites are not inaccurate at all because they promote fan-fiction. By adding this information back, you prove yourself to be a fan-fictioner, and not someone who wants to add facts to the encyclopedia. If you fail to prove that these sources are accurate, stay the fuck out of this. Marcus2 (talk) 23:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

• Old requests for peer review
• Start-Class television articles
• Low-importance television articles
• WikiProject Television articles