Misplaced Pages

User talk:Daniel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:05, 30 January 2008 editYellowMonkey (talk | contribs)86,443 edits Clem Hill: click click← Previous edit Revision as of 02:01, 31 January 2008 edit undoZer0431 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,955 edits I wish: new sectionNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:


I have. I don't think you should have protected at all, because the content was changing with each edit. Protection has failed to resolve lengthy disputes relating to this article before. I am also concerned that deletion of material, against consensus and verging on vandalism, has been endorsed by protection. ] | ] 09:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC) I have. I don't think you should have protected at all, because the content was changing with each edit. Protection has failed to resolve lengthy disputes relating to this article before. I am also concerned that deletion of material, against consensus and verging on vandalism, has been endorsed by protection. ] | ] 09:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

== I wish ==

everyone would just STOP putting me in a bad light. Just stop, okay? Just stop. Enough's enough. God, people keep dogging me about stuff that happened a friggin' month ago. ] They're glorifying the vandals that I request be banned and turn and slap me in the face by bringing up, among other things, my topic ban, which REALLY pisses me off. If anyone-and I mean ANYONE-brings this up again, I quit. --<font face="Copperplate Gothic">] <sup><font color="#800000">]</font></sup></font> 02:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:01, 31 January 2008

User:Daniel/Icons User:Daniel/Header User talk:Daniel/Header

Archives

This page was last archived on Monday, January 28. The most recent comments can be found in Archive 58. For a complete list of archives, please see here. If you wish to leave me a new message, please click here. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 05:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Clem Hill

Hi Daniel. I though I would take you up on your offer here. If you have the time and the inclination could you take a look at the article on one of South Australia's greatest cricketing sons. A copy-edit would be great but any advice etc. would be much appreciated. Cheers, Mattinbgn\ 02:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Most certainly - I'll print it out and read over it, and get back to you hopefully on Wednesday. Daniel (talk) 05:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Click click photos? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Clerk-Note-S

A tag has been placed on Template:Clerk-Note-S requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh lulz... :) /me watches Daniel go in a rage because someone dared templating him ;) — DarkFalls 00:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Hmmmm, do we need to head off to ArbCom for this?! Ryan Postlethwaite 00:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
That'll be no good since Daniel will be an arbitrator... *secretly noms Daniel for arbitration* — DarkFalls 01:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Even if the community was misguided enough to support me, I like having some semblance of a life :) Daniel (talk) 05:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the ultimate O RLY moment. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 07:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

OK but...

I have. I don't think you should have protected at all, because the content was changing with each edit. Protection has failed to resolve lengthy disputes relating to this article before. I am also concerned that deletion of material, against consensus and verging on vandalism, has been endorsed by protection. Grant | Talk 09:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I wish

everyone would just STOP putting me in a bad light. Just stop, okay? Just stop. Enough's enough. God, people keep dogging me about stuff that happened a friggin' month ago. This is what people are doing to me. They're glorifying the vandals that I request be banned and turn and slap me in the face by bringing up, among other things, my topic ban, which REALLY pisses me off. If anyone-and I mean ANYONE-brings this up again, I quit. --Gp75motorsports 02:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Daniel: Difference between revisions Add topic