| Revision as of 05:27, 8 February 2008 edit Georgewilliamherbert (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,680 edits new request JhurlburtNext edit → |
| (No difference) |
Revision as of 05:27, 8 February 2008
Jhurlburt
Template:Checkuser requests to be listed
| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 05:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC) |
- Jhurlburt (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- QuackGuru (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: G
Purpose of request: substantiate user Jhurlburt's claim to edit in non-SPA, non-disruptive manner as an IP editor.
I have indef blocked Jhurlburt for being a disruptive SPA on Jimmy Wales - only edited there, nonconstructive edits, part of an ongoing edit war, etc. QuackGuru participated in that, and has rather insistently asked for an unblock on my talk page, and might be related in some sense, but I don't know if there's enough suspicion for true sockpuppetry claim there.
If it is true that Jhurlburt edits constructively under IP addresses, then the SPA and disruptive-only aspects of observed behavior are moderated by that and an unblock may be justified. I hand this to people with checkuser to see if anyone wants to dive into it a bit and determine if there's evidence there that would justify an unblock. If so, feel free to unblock. If you don't want to bother, I understand that too, but I figured I owed them the chance to clear themselves. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 05:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)