Misplaced Pages

User talk:JSane: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:39, 17 March 2008 editJSane (talk | contribs)209 edits Stalking← Previous edit Revision as of 08:21, 17 March 2008 edit undoJSane (talk | contribs)209 edits StalkingNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:


I think the article will survive the AFD. The process is based on WP policies - not on personalities. The better you know the policies - and you should carefully read ] - the better you can convince other editors that the article is good. ] (]) 01:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC) I think the article will survive the AFD. The process is based on WP policies - not on personalities. The better you know the policies - and you should carefully read ] - the better you can convince other editors that the article is good. ] (]) 01:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

==Stalking==
] Please stop posting here with threats. Your aggressiveness is making me very uncomfortable. Thank You. --] (]) 05:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:21, 17 March 2008

Welcome!

Hello, JSane, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Sbowers3 (talk) 01:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Michelle Ferguson-Cohen

An editor has nominated Michelle Ferguson-Cohen, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Michelle Ferguson-Cohen and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:59, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

re: Misplaced Pages:Editor assistance/Requests

I saw your request at WP:EAR for help with Michelle Ferguson-Cohen. Since then I have commented at the AFD page, but forgot to reply to you on this page. Misplaced Pages has a LOT of policies, guidelines, and procedures. It's impossible for a newcomer to know all of them - and easy to get caught up in problems. The welcome message above has links to some of the important stuff. For now, I'll just highlight my favorite phrase:

From Misplaced Pages:Verifiability: "The threshold for inclusion in Misplaced Pages is verifiability, not truth. "Verifiable" in this context means that readers should be able to check that material added to Misplaced Pages has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed."

The cure for most problems is references to reliable sources so that other editors can verify an article's statements. In the case of Michelle Ferguson-Cohen there are good references; they are just buried among the not-so-good references. You have three separate sections for Sources, References, and Notes and they all have a lot of stuff in them. It would be better if you had just one section and if all of the references were inline citations. And then, it would be good to pare them down to just the most informative references.

I think the article will survive the AFD. The process is based on WP policies - not on personalities. The better you know the policies - and you should carefully read notability - the better you can convince other editors that the article is good. Sbowers3 (talk) 01:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

User talk:JSane: Difference between revisions Add topic