| Revision as of 18:22, 6 April 2008 editRodhullandemu (talk | contribs)115,150 edits re | Revision as of 09:20, 8 April 2008 edit undoEyeSerene (talk | contribs)20,213 edits →Re your note: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| No, it's not good. But neither is persistent and unnecessary disruption of ]. If the encyclopedia needs protection, it will get it from me and any other admin who deems it appropriate. --''']''' (]) 18:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC) | No, it's not good. But neither is persistent and unnecessary disruption of ]. If the encyclopedia needs protection, it will get it from me and any other admin who deems it appropriate. --''']''' (]) 18:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Re your note == | |||
| Thank you for your kind comment. I'm not entirely certain what you're referring to (I'm assuming it's some of the copyediting I've done), but really once the article content is in place and properly sourced, the hard work's been done. I can't then in all conscience take too much credit for simply tweaking the prose ;) All the best, ]<sup>]</sup> 09:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:20, 8 April 2008
No, it's not good. But neither is persistent and unnecessary disruption of WP:ANI. If the encyclopedia needs protection, it will get it from me and any other admin who deems it appropriate. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 18:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Re your note
Thank you for your kind comment. I'm not entirely certain what you're referring to (I'm assuming it's some of the copyediting I've done), but really once the article content is in place and properly sourced, the hard work's been done. I can't then in all conscience take too much credit for simply tweaking the prose ;) All the best, EyeSerene 09:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)