Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:25, 1 August 2008

User:Jauerback/Header

I will reply to comments on your talk page. I will then add a link to them on my talk page for both continuity and convenience.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Christine Breese

I saw that you closed Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Christine breese as delete. I wonder whether you saw this. --Evb-wiki (talk) 19:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Bart Versieck

Thank you for reviewing the request (and having him watchlisted)! If, however, you agree with Ryan Postlewaite that I am too involved, I am still willing (as I offered on his talk page) to reduce the block to three days and recuse myself from ANY future blocks, provided that you keep an eye out along with LHVU and xeno. It may not be entirely inaccurate to say that I am becoming more than a tad frustrated. Cheers, CP 18:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Please review deletion of Shmuel Yerushalmi

I just tried to go to this article in order to add information about Yerushalmi's recent arrest, and was surprised to see that it had been deleted earlier today. I have previously edited the article, but was not aware of the deletion discussion. I note that the discussion, which lasted just five days, had only five contributors; the previous deletion discussion, which lasted twelve days, attracted over thirty contributors, and no consensus was reached. I am sure that, if this discussion had been better notified and allowed to run for longer, the result would have been similar. Particularly given the circumstances of his arrest, on the basis of the content of one of his poems, it is to be expected that more readers will be interested to look at the article, which was in any case about a notablr figure.

So I request that you reconsider your decision to delete, and relist the discussion in order to allow greater participation. RolandR (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

My reply]

The request Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shmuel Yerushalmi (2nd nomination), was open for the full five days, albeit it was only discussed by five users. Jauerback is correct in what he stated here, that WP:DRV is probably the best course of action. P.S. - Yeah, Jauerback, I haven't seen you around in a while, I guess our paths just haven't crossed. Useight (talk) 04:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

My reply

Public Information Research

I notice that you recently deleted Public Information Research (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) as a result of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Public Information Research (2nd nomination). While many editors supported the deletion of this article, the comment by Squidfryerchef at the end of the discussion provided new evidence of this organization's notability, namely, that Public Information Research was the subject of an extensive article in Online magazine . Since all editors supporting the deletion of this article did so before this citation was provided, it is highly probable that they did not consider it. Furthermore, I note that no additional comments favoring the deletion of this article were made after this additional evidence of notability was introduced. Therefore, I request that this discussion be reopened and relisted. Thank you. John254 03:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Public Information Research

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Public Information Research. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review..

I'll let you know now, this isn't a request for undeletion, but rather for a user draft. I figured it would be a good idea to have a formal discussion even for a draft, given the past PIR/DB situations. -- Ned Scott 04:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Closing AfDs the modern way...

Hey there. I've recently come back from a long wikibreak and want to help out in the traditional AfD backlog once more. What's the current hot script for automating the boring parts of it? I'm using the ancient AfD closure script but I suspect there may be some exciting new thing to make it even easier and faster - deary me, Misplaced Pages is scary these days (I discovered HG this week...). Any advice appreciated :) —Sean Whitton / 10:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

My reply.

Ha, okay fair enough thanks. I'll see if I come across any smoother ways of doing things. —Sean Whitton / 11:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter

The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Discussion of my article Page

Pls favor in keeping deletion/discussion page of Brhmaand Pujan strictly confidential/un accesable as it is giving wrong signal to the seeker when it get hit on search engines.This has been requested by legal dept. of said pages. Under your expert guidence i may start this page soon. --Dralansun (talk) 03:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)