Misplaced Pages

User talk:Barneca: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:11, 21 August 2008 editBarneca (talk | contribs)16,070 edits Thank you: fix format← Previous edit Revision as of 02:29, 22 August 2008 edit undoAbd (talk | contribs)14,259 edits Request for participation in User:Abd/RfC: new sectionNext edit →
Line 45: Line 45:


{{subst:uw-gratuitousbreachofdecorum1}} --] (]) 20:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC) <small>well I'll be , there's no such template.</small> {{subst:uw-gratuitousbreachofdecorum1}} --] (]) 20:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC) <small>well I'll be , there's no such template.</small>

== Request for participation in ] ==

Because my participation as a Misplaced Pages editor has been questioned, and if I continue as I have in the past, I can expect future challenges as well, I have begun a standing RfC in my user space, at ]. There is also a specific incident RfC at ]. I understand that you may not have time to participate directly; however, if you wish to be notified of any outcome from the general or specific RfC, or if you wish to identify a participant or potential participant as one generally trusted by you, or otherwise to indicate interest in the topic(s), please consider listing yourself at ], and, should you so decide, naming a proxy as indicated there. Your designation of a proxy will not bind you, and your proxy will not comment or vote for you, but only for himself or herself; however, I may consider proxy designations in weighing comment in this RfC, as to how they might represent the general community. You may revoke this designation at any time. This RfC is for my own guidance as to future behavior and actions, it is advisory only, upon me and on participants. This notice is going to all those who commented on my Talk page in the period between my warning for personal attack, assumptions of bad faith, and general disruption, on August 11, 2008, until August 20, 2008. This is not a standard RfC; because it is for my advice, I assert authority over the process. However, initially, all editors are welcome, even if otherwise banned from my Talk space or from the project. Canvassing is permitted, as far as I'm concerned; I will regulate participation if needed, but do not spam. Notice of this RfC may be placed on noticeboards or wikiprojects, should any of you think this appropriate; however, the reason for doing this in my user space is to minimize disruption, and I am not responsible for any disruption arising from discussion of this outside my user space. Thanks for considering this. --] (]) 02:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:29, 22 August 2008

User:Barneca/Header


Colorful notices

I have, for all intents and purposes, left the building. If there are any lingering issues I thought were resolved but aren't, please email me. Hasta luego. --barneca (talk) 16:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Barneca/Revert notice User:Barneca/Reply notice User:Barneca/Protection notice

Archiving icon
Archives

I've archived my talk page early to emphasize my current level of detachment from this place. Please read the colorful notices above. --barneca (talk) 19:19, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Takethatmrsmckay

Hi -- it's easy to lose your temper when people ignore you, but the indef block of user:takethatmrsmckay was probably overkill, given that this is surely just an ignorant kid. Looie496 (talk) 01:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi Looie,
I'm not upset, and didn't lose my temper; it just seemed like there's a 0% chance of him making a productive edit, and blocking indef is what we do with vandalism-only accounts. If he requests an unblock, someone might disagree; I'd be open to using {{2ndchance}}. But he basically admitted his only interest was in playing around. I certainly didn't block him because I was mad (and I'm a little puzzled why you think that); I blocked him to end the disruption. --barneca (talk) 11:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Redvers awards this Barnstar to Barneca for a null edit that confirms why I have long had deep respect for you. ➨ ЯEDVERS has nothing to declare except his jeans 21:26, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Barnstars for null edits.... Damn, I must be living right! Thanks, Redvers, for the barnstar (I love these stupid things) and the kind words. --barneca (talk) 21:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Best. ANI. Post. Ever.

I won't link it, you know which one. The irony is not lost on me that others are using your now "redacted" titled thread to continue doing exactly what they were doing in the myriad threads surrounding it. Sigh. Keeper ǀ 76 19:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

I came here to say exactly the same thing. – Steel 19:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Not sure whether to laugh or cry. I feel like John the Baptist (wasn't he the "voice crying in the wilderness" that no one paid any attention to? It's been so long since I was dragged to church that it's all getting a little fuzzy now.) I'm getting more and more tempted to unwatchlist ANI altogether.

As far as redacting my thread title, Jehochman forgot something, so I'll go ahead and do it myself:

{{subst:uw-gratuitousbreachofdecorum1}} --barneca (talk) 20:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC) well I'll be , there's no such template.

Request for participation in User:Abd/RfC

Because my participation as a Misplaced Pages editor has been questioned, and if I continue as I have in the past, I can expect future challenges as well, I have begun a standing RfC in my user space, at User:Abd/RfC. There is also a specific incident RfC at User:Abd/RfC/8.11.08 block. I understand that you may not have time to participate directly; however, if you wish to be notified of any outcome from the general or specific RfC, or if you wish to identify a participant or potential participant as one generally trusted by you, or otherwise to indicate interest in the topic(s), please consider listing yourself at User:Abd/RfC/Proxy Table, and, should you so decide, naming a proxy as indicated there. Your designation of a proxy will not bind you, and your proxy will not comment or vote for you, but only for himself or herself; however, I may consider proxy designations in weighing comment in this RfC, as to how they might represent the general community. You may revoke this designation at any time. This RfC is for my own guidance as to future behavior and actions, it is advisory only, upon me and on participants. This notice is going to all those who commented on my Talk page in the period between my warning for personal attack, assumptions of bad faith, and general disruption, on August 11, 2008, until August 20, 2008. This is not a standard RfC; because it is for my advice, I assert authority over the process. However, initially, all editors are welcome, even if otherwise banned from my Talk space or from the project. Canvassing is permitted, as far as I'm concerned; I will regulate participation if needed, but do not spam. Notice of this RfC may be placed on noticeboards or wikiprojects, should any of you think this appropriate; however, the reason for doing this in my user space is to minimize disruption, and I am not responsible for any disruption arising from discussion of this outside my user space. Thanks for considering this. --Abd (talk) 02:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Barneca: Difference between revisions Add topic