Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tom Sayle: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:35, 26 September 2008 editTom Sayle (talk | contribs)223 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:39, 26 September 2008 edit undoGtstricky (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,404 edits answer to helpmeNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
No it's not. Check edit as well as two. Please don't insult me. ]]]] 15:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC) No it's not. Check edit as well as two. Please don't insult me. ]]]] 15:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


{{helpme|Would I get away with signing as one of my sockpuppets?}} {{tnull|helpme|Would I get away with signing as one of my sockpuppets?}}
:No <b>]<sup>] or ]</sup></b> 17:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:39, 26 September 2008

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tom Sayle (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked, and I'm certain I've learnt to stop doing it.

Decline reason:

This is rather inspecific, so please forgive me if I don't unblock you just now. We frequently get unblock requests that claim they understand when really they just want to get unblocked so they can continue the disruption they were blocked for. What exactly do you understand, and how do you intend to improve if you are unblocked? — Hersfold 16:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Tom Sayle (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will stop adding false information and hoax pages, and instead create some pages to do with some of the chef profiles on www.bbc.co.uk. Also, if you are not Hersfold reviewing the block, kindly get her to do it.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I will stop adding false information and hoax pages, and instead create some pages to do with some of the chef profiles on www.bbc.co.uk. Also, if you are not ] reviewing the block, kindly get her to do it. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I will stop adding false information and hoax pages, and instead create some pages to do with some of the chef profiles on www.bbc.co.uk. Also, if you are not ] reviewing the block, kindly get her to do it. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I will stop adding false information and hoax pages, and instead create some pages to do with some of the chef profiles on www.bbc.co.uk. Also, if you are not ] reviewing the block, kindly get her to do it. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

{{helpme|Why was it indefinate?}}

No it's not. Check this edit as well as these two. Please don't insult me. Thomas Michael William Patrick Sales 15:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme|Would I get away with signing as one of my sockpuppets?}}

No Gtstricky 17:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Category:
User talk:Tom Sayle: Difference between revisions Add topic