Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/American Accounts Payable Association: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:43, 12 October 2008 editCarcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,579 edits →American Accounts Payable Association: adding closing tag - five AfDs to close here← Previous edit Revision as of 17:14, 12 October 2008 edit undoCarcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,579 edits close as merge, with reasons and mention of spread-out bundled nominationNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
⚫ ===]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{closing}}
<!--Template:Afd top
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''Merge''' to ]. This decision took into account the comments made at the other 4 deletion discussions, and not just the comments made below (three of the five were kept, two were merged). Such "bundled" nominations are usually fine, as long as they are on the same page and not on separate pages. The spread-out nature of the discussion did make closing difficult, almost to the point of relisting. This decision does not prejudice further merging if that is deemed necessary by further discussion. ] (]) 17:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

The five AfDs reviewed to reach this decision were:
*] ('''keep''')
*] ('''keep''')
*] ('''keep''')
*] ('''merge''')
*] ('''merge''')

⚫ ===]===
:{{la|American Accounts Payable Association}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|American Accounts Payable Association}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
These five articles: These five articles:
Line 27: Line 39:
*'''Merge''' to the main organization. ''']''' (]) 02:18, 8 October 2008 (UTC) *'''Merge''' to the main organization. ''']''' (]) 02:18, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to the main organisation when that article is sufficiently rebuilt in userspace using reliable 3rd party sources which cover the subject in a non-trivial manner. ] (]) 12:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC) *'''Merge''' to the main organisation when that article is sufficiently rebuilt in userspace using reliable 3rd party sources which cover the subject in a non-trivial manner. ] (]) 12:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Revision as of 17:14, 12 October 2008

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to American Payroll Association. This decision took into account the comments made at the other 4 deletion discussions, and not just the comments made below (three of the five were kept, two were merged). Such "bundled" nominations are usually fine, as long as they are on the same page and not on separate pages. The spread-out nature of the discussion did make closing difficult, almost to the point of relisting. This decision does not prejudice further merging if that is deemed necessary by further discussion. Carcharoth (talk) 17:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

The five AfDs reviewed to reach this decision were:

American Accounts Payable Association

American Accounts Payable Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

These five articles:

were all created in a short period of time by a single user who has contributed to no other article except for a mention to American Payroll Association in the Accounts payable article.

These articles do not cite any outside references (other than one advertisement / press release) or claim any notability of the topic, and appear serve no purpose other than to promote the umbrella organization and its activities, including its fee-based certification programs. Bongomatic (talk) 12:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Exit2DOS2000 01:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/American Accounts Payable Association: Difference between revisions Add topic