| Revision as of 23:47, 23 October 2008 editRetroS1mone (talk | contribs)3,474 edits →3RR violation: report← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:51, 23 October 2008 edit undoRoadcreature (talk | contribs)4,347 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| <!--end of page header--> | <!--end of page header--> | ||
| {{Unblock|Restoring dispute tags is not editwarring. If it were, the rallying side could always avoid dispute resolution. Note further that there is consensus for the npov tag that I put back. By blocking me, ] once again disrupts any chance of dispute resolution. Note that DavidRuben has been asked to withdraw from my case several times by a.o. ]. Davidruben is on the opposing side in this dispute.}} | |||
| == 3RR violation == | |||
| Please note that you have exceed ] at ]. Please discuss on the talk page and don't edit war. ] ] 22:29, 23 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :The rule does not apply to restoring wrongly removed tags. Policy on tags comes first. Please stop removing dispute tags. ] (], ]) 22:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::As I've pointed out to Guido a few times in the past, he has not used the tags correctly, and they should never have been put in in the first place. --] (]) 22:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Fortunately, that's not for you to decide, which has been pointed out to you numerous times by various users. ] (], ]) 23:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I have reported you bc of your pattern of disruptive edits at . ] ] 23:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:51, 23 October 2008
| User | Talk | Edits | Pinboard | Drafts | Articles | Projects |
 Archives |
| Prof. Anton Komaroff (2007): "None of the participants in creating the 1988 CFS case definition and name ever expressed any concern that it might TRIVIALISE the illness. We were insensitive to that possibility and WE WERE WRONG." |
| Prof. Malcolm Hooper (2007): "The simplest test for M.E. is just to say to the patient ‘stand over there for ten minutes’." |
Roadcreature (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Restoring dispute tags is not editwarring. If it were, the rallying side could always avoid dispute resolution. Note further that there is consensus for the npov tag that I put back. By blocking me, User:Davidruben once again disrupts any chance of dispute resolution. Note that DavidRuben has been asked to withdraw from my case several times by a.o. User:Carcharoth. Davidruben is on the opposing side in this dispute.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Restoring dispute tags is not editwarring. If it were, the rallying side could always avoid dispute resolution. Note further that there is consensus for the npov tag that I put back. By blocking me, ] once again disrupts any chance of dispute resolution. Note that DavidRuben has been asked to withdraw from my case several times by a.o. ]. Davidruben is on the opposing side in this dispute. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Restoring dispute tags is not editwarring. If it were, the rallying side could always avoid dispute resolution. Note further that there is consensus for the npov tag that I put back. By blocking me, ] once again disrupts any chance of dispute resolution. Note that DavidRuben has been asked to withdraw from my case several times by a.o. ]. Davidruben is on the opposing side in this dispute. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Restoring dispute tags is not editwarring. If it were, the rallying side could always avoid dispute resolution. Note further that there is consensus for the npov tag that I put back. By blocking me, ] once again disrupts any chance of dispute resolution. Note that DavidRuben has been asked to withdraw from my case several times by a.o. ]. Davidruben is on the opposing side in this dispute. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
| Martin Luther King: "Everything that we see is a shadow cast by that which we do not see." |
User:Guido den Broeder/Navigation Footer
Category: