| Revision as of 00:08, 16 December 2008 editとある白い猫 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,796 editsm →CSI WP:RFAR/ScientologyOn your statement you← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:27, 18 March 2009 edit undoDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,739 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| --<small> ]</small> <sup>]</sup> 18:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | --<small> ]</small> <sup>]</sup> 18:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==Scientology arbitration== | |||
| Per the of arbitrator {{user0|Roger Davies}}, this notice is to inform you of the current arbitration case concerning Scientology, which can be viewed at ]. You are receiving this notification because you were one of the users listed in the ]. | |||
| For Roger Davies and the Arbitration Committee<br>] (]) 08:27, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:27, 18 March 2009
Involvement at ArbCom
Hello. Based on your brief editing history and apparent familiarity with Misplaced Pages's policies and procedures, along with your editing focus on Dianetics, you appear to be a returning user under a new name. I don't personally have a problem with that, but you should be aware how it will appear to administrators reviewing the current ArbCom incident report. If you are a returning user, I strongly suggest you disclose the previous account you edited under to avoid accusations of sockpuppetry. --GoodDamon 20:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Suspected sock of Highfructosecornsyrup
You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Misplaced Pages accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Highfructosecornsyrup. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 21:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I have never had any other Misplaced Pages account. But I did edit in an article called High-fructose corn syrup. Is that how you got the idea? Shrampes (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
An open invitation
Hey there. I noticed recently that you had an interest in Scientology-related topics. A few days ago I devoted some time to some massive restructuring of Scientology beliefs and practices. Any quality seconadry-sourced contributions you could make there would be appreciated. Thanks. ←Spidern→ 04:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hello. I am in the middle of a research project and do not have a lot of time for Misplaced Pages edits but thank you for the invitation. Shrampes (talk) 05:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#Scientology
I've opened a request for arbitration and listed you as a named party. You may wish to make a statement. Best wishes, Durova 18:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- I did. Shrampes (talk) 02:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Scientology
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Scientology/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Scientology/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Daniel (talk) 04:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
CSI WP:RFAR/Scientology
Hi, I am going to collect evidence for the Scientology RFAR as an independent third party. I want to point out that I am not the wiki-police nor do I have any kind of official role.
On your statement you talk about accidentally bumping into the Scientology dispute when Spidern reverts you. Could you specify when was that (if possible with a diff). Were you aware of the Scientology dispute in question? Were you involved with the dispute before your encounter with Spidern in any other way?
To what extent are you involved with the Scientology dispute? Have you made any significant contribution to Scientology related topics?
-- Cat 18:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Scientology arbitration
Per the request of arbitrator Roger Davies (talk), this notice is to inform you of the current arbitration case concerning Scientology, which can be viewed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Scientology. You are receiving this notification because you were one of the users listed in the new evidence presented by Cirt.
For Roger Davies and the Arbitration Committee
Daniel (talk) 08:27, 18 March 2009 (UTC)