Misplaced Pages

User talk:Kingevil: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:26, 3 June 2009 editJprw (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,935 edits Created page with 'Please see my comments in the reinstated (perfectly good) edits on the Alice Cooper page. I don't know what your reasoning is for removing perfectly good references…'  Revision as of 20:32, 3 June 2009 edit undoKingevil (talk | contribs)85 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Please see my comments in the reinstated (perfectly good) edits on the Alice Cooper page. I don't know what your reasoning is for removing perfectly good references. In addition, when you post your own reference (re: the so called "demented clown" eyes) it is completely irrelevant. Please also try to not resort to launching ad hominem attacks as this is usually a sure sign that you are losing an argument. Your whole approach to the Alice Cooper page seems to be excessively subjective and not up to Misplaced Pages's overall standards for editing, although I do agree that with some of your edits the Alice Cooper page has been improved ] (]) 10:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Please see my comments in the reinstated (perfectly good) edits on the Alice Cooper page. I don't know what your reasoning is for removing perfectly good references. In addition, when you post your own reference (re: the so called "demented clown" eyes) it is completely irrelevant. Please also try to not resort to launching ad hominem attacks as this is usually a sure sign that you are losing an argument. Your whole approach to the Alice Cooper page seems to be excessively subjective and not up to Misplaced Pages's overall standards for editing, although I do agree that with some of your edits the Alice Cooper page has been improved ] (]) 10:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

go ruin someone else's article.] (]) 20:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:32, 3 June 2009

Please see my comments in the reinstated (perfectly good) edits on the Alice Cooper page. I don't know what your reasoning is for removing perfectly good references. In addition, when you post your own reference (re: the so called "demented clown" eyes) it is completely irrelevant. Please also try to not resort to launching ad hominem attacks as this is usually a sure sign that you are losing an argument. Your whole approach to the Alice Cooper page seems to be excessively subjective and not up to Misplaced Pages's overall standards for editing, although I do agree that with some of your edits the Alice Cooper page has been improved Jprw (talk) 10:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

go ruin someone else's article.Kingevil (talk) 20:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Kingevil: Difference between revisions Add topic