| Revision as of 17:02, 5 June 2009 editKingevil (talk | contribs)85 edits →Ownership and personal attack issues - you have been blocked.← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:02, 5 June 2009 edit undoKingevil (talk | contribs)85 edits →June 2009Next edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| go ruin someone else's article.] (]) 20:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | go ruin someone else's article.] (]) 20:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == June 2009 == | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been {{#ifeq:|yes|indefinitely ] from editing|{{#if:31 hours|''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours'''|temporarily ] from editing}}}} in accordance with ] for '''attempting to ] other users'''. {{#ifeq:|yes||Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ].}} If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:true|--] <sup>]</sup> 22:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)}}</div>{{#ifeq:|yes|]}}</div><!-- Template:uw-hblock --> | |||
Revision as of 17:02, 5 June 2009
Please see my comments in the reinstated (perfectly good) edits on the Alice Cooper page. I don't know what your reasoning is for removing perfectly good references. In addition, when you post your own reference (re: the so called "demented clown" eyes) it is completely irrelevant. Please also try to not resort to launching ad hominem attacks as this is usually a sure sign that you are losing an argument. Your whole approach to the Alice Cooper page seems to be excessively subjective and not up to Misplaced Pages's overall standards for editing, although I do agree that with some of your edits the Alice Cooper page has been improved Jprw (talk) 10:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
go ruin someone else's article.Kingevil (talk) 20:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)