| Revision as of 23:49, 2 August 2009 editIrbisgreif (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Rollbackers4,103 editsm →Talkback: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:49, 2 August 2009 edit undoMythdon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,405 edits Undid revision 305719009 by Irbisgreif (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| ::::::::So should I edit articles instead right now? I know a lot about trumpets.--] (]) 03:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC) | ::::::::So should I edit articles instead right now? I know a lot about trumpets.--] (]) 03:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::::You should edit articles, but, however, if you are found to be a sockpuppet of ''ANY'' user, you won't be allowed to edit, and an administrator will block you on discovery. —<font color="green">]</font> (<font color="teal">]</font> • <font color="teal">]</font>) 04:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC) | :::::::::You should edit articles, but, however, if you are found to be a sockpuppet of ''ANY'' user, you won't be allowed to edit, and an administrator will block you on discovery. —<font color="green">]</font> (<font color="teal">]</font> • <font color="teal">]</font>) 04:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{talkback|Irbisgreif}} | |||
| ] (]) 23:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:49, 2 August 2009
 Archives |
RfC
Right now I'm thinking about filing a self-RfC. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 16:12, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've changed my mind. That's a "no". —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 16:27, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Templates
Lay off of the templates. They have been made to be distinct from each other, which includes using different colors and definitely other fonts colors than white.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- All I am trying to do is make the templates readable, and less confusing. Do you have a problem with that? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- They are readable and the coloration has nothing to induce confusion.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:07, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- When you put red text on top of a purple background, it is extremely hard to read. If you would please revert back to my versions, they will be more readable. Putting black text on a dark color background is not a good thing, and white should be used as the text color in that case. Readers will not want to look at a template that they won't be able to read. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, that one needs to be fixed. However, I will be looking for alternate colors. Also, there are no instances of black text on dark backgrounds that I am aware of. {{Kamen Rider Decade}} is a light pink with black text.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- {{Kamen Rider Decade}} looks like more of a dark pink, than a light pink. Since it's a dark color, white is more effective than black. Black isn't the worst color, however, because gray would be much worse. We need to ensure that our readers can read all of the text. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:17, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- The color is perfectly readable.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- But it's not readable enough. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:43, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- That makes no sense whatsoever. I'll try to improve the templates. But using white text is ugly.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see how white is ugly. Could you please explain? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Also, gold just make it worse. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm working on it. STFU and let change happen.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- No, I am not going to shut up. I know you're working on it. But, however, this is another example of just making it worse. Following the previous black text on a darker red, you've now put red text on a black background. Not good. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 01:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- I am talking with a fellow editor who says that that is perfectly readable. I am done talking with you because you cannot seem to comprehend what is and what is not good.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:07, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Who are you talking to? —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 01:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- I am talking with a fellow editor who says that that is perfectly readable. I am done talking with you because you cannot seem to comprehend what is and what is not good.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:07, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- No, I am not going to shut up. I know you're working on it. But, however, this is another example of just making it worse. Following the previous black text on a darker red, you've now put red text on a black background. Not good. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 01:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm working on it. STFU and let change happen.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- That makes no sense whatsoever. I'll try to improve the templates. But using white text is ugly.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- But it's not readable enough. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:43, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- The color is perfectly readable.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- {{Kamen Rider Decade}} looks like more of a dark pink, than a light pink. Since it's a dark color, white is more effective than black. Black isn't the worst color, however, because gray would be much worse. We need to ensure that our readers can read all of the text. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:17, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, that one needs to be fixed. However, I will be looking for alternate colors. Also, there are no instances of black text on dark backgrounds that I am aware of. {{Kamen Rider Decade}} is a light pink with black text.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- When you put red text on top of a purple background, it is extremely hard to read. If you would please revert back to my versions, they will be more readable. Putting black text on a dark color background is not a good thing, and white should be used as the text color in that case. Readers will not want to look at a template that they won't be able to read. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- They are readable and the coloration has nothing to induce confusion.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:07, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
What is going on?
Why are people ignoring my edits?--The Singer Who Carries A Trumpet (talk) 03:36, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Based on your low edit count for a high knowledge of Misplaced Pages, it is highly possible that you are a sockpuppet of someone. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:37, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sockpuppet? What is that supposed to mean? And how do you know how many edits I have done?--The Singer Who Carries A Trumpet (talk) 03:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sockpuppet means an alternate account of someone's main account being used in an abusive manner. And, as for your edit count, it tells me right here. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- So because I'm participating in a request for adminship discussion, I am being abusive. Why won't you remove the other oppose person's edit? Is it because they have done heaps of edits?--The Singer Who Carries A Trumpet (talk) 03:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- New users don't participate in adminship discussions in their first few edits. They do that later on. And whether or not you're being abusive or not, the sockpuppet suspicion can still come. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- That sounds unfair. Doesn't it? How many edits do you have to make before you can participate in admin discussions. 100? 200? 1000?--The Singer Who Carries A Trumpet (talk) 03:51, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- There is no requirement, but your edit count being as low as it is will look to others that this is not your first account. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:53, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- So should I edit articles instead right now? I know a lot about trumpets.--The Singer Who Carries A Trumpet (talk) 03:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- You should edit articles, but, however, if you are found to be a sockpuppet of ANY user, you won't be allowed to edit, and an administrator will block you on discovery. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 04:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- So should I edit articles instead right now? I know a lot about trumpets.--The Singer Who Carries A Trumpet (talk) 03:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- There is no requirement, but your edit count being as low as it is will look to others that this is not your first account. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:53, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- That sounds unfair. Doesn't it? How many edits do you have to make before you can participate in admin discussions. 100? 200? 1000?--The Singer Who Carries A Trumpet (talk) 03:51, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- New users don't participate in adminship discussions in their first few edits. They do that later on. And whether or not you're being abusive or not, the sockpuppet suspicion can still come. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- So because I'm participating in a request for adminship discussion, I am being abusive. Why won't you remove the other oppose person's edit? Is it because they have done heaps of edits?--The Singer Who Carries A Trumpet (talk) 03:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sockpuppet means an alternate account of someone's main account being used in an abusive manner. And, as for your edit count, it tells me right here. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sockpuppet? What is that supposed to mean? And how do you know how many edits I have done?--The Singer Who Carries A Trumpet (talk) 03:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)