Misplaced Pages

:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:In the news Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:25, 26 August 2009 editHonouraryMix (talk | contribs)1,051 edits ITN candidates for August 26: Indented last point.← Previous edit Revision as of 20:27, 26 August 2009 edit undoAshishg55 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,511 edits ITN candidates for August 26Next edit →
Line 171: Line 171:
:: Now as far as I can see no-one has explained how Kennedy's deaths meets any of these criteria. Arguments are limited to saying that he was very important in America and as such it is ITN worthy, saying his death is being followed by loads of news organisations across the globe and ITN should follow suit or saying that opposing on the grounds of US centricism is not a valid reason and as such should not stop this going up--] (]) 20:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC) :: Now as far as I can see no-one has explained how Kennedy's deaths meets any of these criteria. Arguments are limited to saying that he was very important in America and as such it is ITN worthy, saying his death is being followed by loads of news organisations across the globe and ITN should follow suit or saying that opposing on the grounds of US centricism is not a valid reason and as such should not stop this going up--] (]) 20:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
:::Concur. It is unfortunate that accusations of anti-Americanism are now flying around, along with a threat at IAR, but it doesn't help that US-centricism accusations have been made by people, including me, for which I apologize. My basic point is that the criteria labelled above does not cover Kennedy; to put briefly, he was an important figure in the US, not in the world. ] (]) 20:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC) :::Concur. It is unfortunate that accusations of anti-Americanism are now flying around, along with a threat at IAR, but it doesn't help that US-centricism accusations have been made by people, including me, for which I apologize. My basic point is that the criteria labelled above does not cover Kennedy; to put briefly, he was an important figure in the US, not in the world. ] (]) 20:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
::::well i did explain in steps how it does not meet the criteria. the response was "US Senator is one of the highest levels of power in US politics", so i stopped replying. Im sorry but clearly people supporting dont even want to read why the item doesnt meet guidelines. i got nothing against US items or Kennedy. He was great senator sure but this news item is limited within US and logically if u post this u should be posting 2nd level (below head of state) politician deaths for entire world. Since we will clearly not do that then posting this item makes ITN US-centric by default. People comparing this to Les Paul should first find out that Les Paul was a musician who had worldwide impact and thats why it was posted. ITN is not breaking news or today's top stories. it needs to stay neutral (as much as possible) across whole world and for that reason it should not be posted (unless ofcourse all those supporting would like to come back and support every death of other countries 2nd level politicians. but most likely no one will be seen on ITN again and the regular people will have deal with the aftermath). -- ]] 20:27, 26 August 2009 (UTC)



;Moldova ;Moldova

Revision as of 20:27, 26 August 2009

Click here to nominate an item for In the news. In the news toolbox
Shortcuts

Purge this page to update the cache

This page provides editors a forum to suggest items for inclusion in Template:In the news (ITN), a protected Main Page template, as well as the forum for discussion of candidates.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. Under each daily section header below is the transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day (with a light green header). Each day's portal page is followed by a subsection for suggestions and discussion.

Suggesting an item

In order to suggest a candidate:

  • Start, find or modify a blurb directly in the light green box for that day's Current events. Make sure that you include a reference from a verifiable, reliable source.
  • Update an article linked to from the blurb to include the recent developments, or find an article that has already been updated.
  • Nominate the blurb for ITN inclusion under that day's ITN Candidates subheading, emboldening the link to the updated article.
    For standard entry styles, please see WP:In the news section on the Main Page/Style.

There are criteria guiding the decision on whether or not to put a particular item on In the news, based largely on the extensiveness of the updated content and the perceived significance of the recent developments. Submissions that do not follow the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:In the news section on the Main Page will not be put into the live template.

David Lynch in 1990David Lynch in 1990 Ongoing: Recent deaths:

view - page history - related changes - Edit (admins only)


Sample candidate discussion

It doesn't seem to have any references for the new content. --They've also signed their comment 12:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I went ahead and added some citations. It should be ready now. --User's Name 12:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Looks good. Posted. --Responding administrator 12:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

And so on. When continuing the discussion please refrain from using dot points/bullets to allow the candidates to stand out from the discussion. Indent your comments for clarity.

Please refrain from straight support or oppose votes; focus the discussion on the merits of the available candidate items.

Creating a new day header

If it’s not already created (see below), use the following box to create a new day at Portal:Current events. Follow the instructions in the editing pane to create a new day under the Suggestions header.


Template:ITN-Update

Discussions of items older than seven days are automatically archived

February–March 2005April 2005May 2005June 2005July 2005August 2005September 2005October 2005November 2005December 2005January 2006February 2006March 2006April 2006May 2006June 2006July 2006August 2006September 2006October 2006November 2006December 2006January 2007February 2007March 2007April 2007May 2007June 2007July 2007August 2007September 2007October 2007November 2007December 2007January 2008February 2008March 2008April 2008May 2008June 2008July 2008August 2008September 2008October 2008November 2008December 2008January 2009February 2009March 2009April 2009May 2009June 2009July 2009August 2009September 2009October 2009November 2009December 2009January 2010February 2010March 2010April 2010May 2010June 2010July 2010August 2010September 2010October 2010November 2010December 2010January 2011February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020October 2020November 2020December 2020January 2021February 2021March 2021April 2021May 2021June 2021July 2021August 2021September 2021October 2021November 2021December 2021January 2022February 2022March 2022April 2022May 2022June 2022July 2022August 2022September 2022October 2022November 2022December 2022January 2023February 2023March 2023April 2023May 2023June 2023July 2023August 2023September 2023October 2023November 2023December 2023January 2024February 2024March 2024April 2024May 2024June 2024July 2024August 2024September 2024October 2024November 2024December 2024January 2025

Suggestions

Future events

Please see Misplaced Pages:In the news section on the Main Page/Future events.

August 26

August 26, 2009 (2009-08-26) (Wednesday)

ITN candidates for August 26

Ted Kennedy
(taken from talk:Main Page) Should be on the news section 77.234.159.97 (talk) 07:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
(taken from talk:Main Page)I would agree especially since Les Paul's and Corazon Aquino's deaths were on there. Spiderone 07:45, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
OK, this is where we see this blind US-centricism creeping in again. You can't really compare Kennedy to Les Paul (who was one of, if not the most important pioneer of 20th century music - remember without Les Paul there is no Beatles et al.) or Aquino (who was a former head of state). What makes Ted Kennedy more notable than any of the other 99 US senators? What makes a US Senator as important as a former Philippine head of state or nobel prize winning South Korean president? The only response that evers seems to come up, is because they are American and the US is apparently the centre of the universe, lord of all nations etc etc. Unless they have had a major impact on politics then political deaths should be reserved for current and former political leaders. For that reason I'm going to oppose --Daviessimo (talk) 08:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
I am going to support because the loss of Ted Kennedy means the US Senate no longer has a filibuster Democratic block and won't for months due to Massachusetts laws that require a certain downtime before another senator is elected. This could have huge implications with the US health care bill that is currently being considered. While not world news, it will definitely have ramifications in the US. And honestly, I've never even heard of Les Paul, no offense. I also am not a huge fan of music.
Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 08:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose. If it were any other country...  Cargoking  talk  08:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Although... it has had a lot of international attention .  Cargoking  talk  09:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
He was much more notable than most of the Senators. He was presented with both Honorary Knighthood by QEII and Merit of Honor in Chile. Its also currently the lead story on BBC, ABC (Australia), Al-Jazeera, AFP, La Repubblica, plus (I'd assume) many more. Deserted Cities 09:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
The update is way too short.  Cargoking  talk  09:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
How much of an update is needed? Deserted Cities 09:27, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
A solid paragraph or two (I think). " the traditional cutoff for 'enough' has been around three complete, referenced and well-formed paragraphs.", from WP:ITNMP  Cargoking  talk  09:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Support. Ted Kennedy is obviously internationally notable, the sources from Deserted Cities say it all. This is no ordinary Senator. (Note that I opposed putting up Al Franken's seating, and that's from my home state.) I actually think this will help the health care bill by galvanizing its supporters... Grandmasterka 09:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose US-centric, non-leader --Stephen 09:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
(←) He need not be a leader per Misplaced Pages:ITNMP#Deaths, only that he be in high ranking office of power, and had a significant contribution/impact on the country/region. Also, only a paragraph is needed per the same criteria. Deserted Cities 09:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose. I don't think all the criteria are met here. --Tone 10:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Why not? According to the death criteria, only one of the three must be met. He was a Senator, thus a high-ranking official. His impact speaks for itself. Deserted Cities 10:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
As I said before, if it were any other country.  Cargoking  talk  10:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Support. But it's not. This is the last of the Kennedy brothers who just died. We could of course discuss this for a week or so, then put it up in the "In the news" section, and make complete and utter fools of ourselves. Lampman (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Ted Kennedy
Ted Kennedy
Lampman, do you support US centralism? US centralism is an increasingly growing problem.  Cargoking  talk  11:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Ted Kennedy was not just a senator. He's been one of the highest-profile figures in American politics for 45 years. Your cries of US-centrism are meaningless; I propose there's a bias towards meaningless pap (cricket games and beauty pageants) and we should counter this bias with stories of political and economic significance. Noisalt (talk) 11:57, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Strong support. No. 1 topic in almost all countries around the world, for example BBC News, Tagesschau.de, Le Monde. --bender235 (talk) 12:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Strong support. Influential figure, last of his generation in a well-known dynasty, familiar name worldwide. Radagast (talk) 12:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
He was without a doubt the most influenful United States Senator of the past 50 years. Front page in almost every newspaper in the world explains it all. Not every American politician gets that treatment. Support Secret 12:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
reaction from politicians from around the world Secret 12:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
OK look, people keep using the argument that it is headline news across the world as an argument for this to go up, but with deaths this is not a valid measurement of importance. Like I've said a hundred times before a person is only notable for what they have done, not who they are - like I always say, apply the Tim Berners-Lee test - most people have never heard of him, but no-one can ever doubt the importance he has had in modern history. Yes Ted Kennedy is well known, but this is because of who he is and not because as a senator he has changed the face of American politics. Also I would just like to highlight a problematic fallacy with some of the argument which are claiming that the story is headline news around the world. I know from how the BBC works that if you live outside the UK, when you visit the BBC website you are taken to the BBC World home page and not the proper BBC homepage (which is .co.uk not .com) The top story on the proper BBC is not this story but rather a story relating the violence between West Ham and Millwall fans last night. I suspect the same is the case for other websites around the world and, as such, just because what you see is one thing, doesn't mean that is what people in the country in question are seeing --Daviessimo (talk) 12:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Well, the Times of London currently has Kennedy's death as the lead story in it's UK edition, or at least that's what I'm seeing sitting in Russia. Also, I would think that if the BBC Global website has it as the lead story, that would be stronger grounds than the UK version. The BBC Global site is global in outreach, therefore more relevant to what is in ITN than the UK version.--Johnsemlak (talk) 17:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
We have quite a simple criteria with a politician death (does not matter if it is stated somewhere or not). We post either head of state or former head of state. As i see it kennedy was neither and i dont remember (or have read) him having a worldwide impact to make an exception. strong oppose. we would fill the ITN with deaths everyday otherwise. but it doesnt really matter when it comes to US news. some admin always seems to post it either way -- Ashish-g55 13:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
lol this is hilarious. while i was typing the above some admin posted it. in what world is all of the above a proper consensus... -- Ashish-g55 13:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Posted for better or for worse. I'm personally on the fence about whether this is an appropriate addition, leaning on oppose, but the death criteria appears to permit it, even if it shouldn't have. -- tariqabjotu 13:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Death criteria also does not state that it is ok to post a US senator where as not ok to post Canadian primeres, Indian chief of states etc etc. We quite literally expanded the field for US deaths by 99 people based on BBC posting it on their front page. As Daviessimo just said they had Millwall story last night on front page... we dont post every front page news because that is not our criteria. we are not a news source. we should be trying to remove as much bias from ITN as we can not add more by expanding a US only death field... this is more US centric in my opinion than Sonia Sotomayer making it on ITN like 3 times for same news story. -- Ashish-g55 13:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
"We quite literally expanded the field for US deaths by 99 people based on BBC posting it on their front page." I don't think that's what happened. -- tariqabjotu 13:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
if this stayed up then yes we did. at next senator death people will come and show us the diff for this addition. and there is absolutely nothing that can be done then since logically if u post this one u will have to post others too. -- Ashish-g55 14:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Um... no, not really, but okay... -- tariqabjotu 14:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
i know what u mean but i only speak from experience. too many items get posted because we posted the last one. there will never be a good enough reason to not post the next one if we post this. -- Ashish-g55 14:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
(←)Strong OpposeThis is happening time and again. Every time anything happens in the US, its popped up in ITN. Just because all the news website cover this doesn't make it ITN worthy - the sheer fact that anything is US is closely followed by all major news websites (some of them are even from the US) is not an excuse. All the factors mentioned above: Kennedy Family, Health Bill, Majority in the US Senate etc., are issues which mean ZILCH in the rest of the world. The criteria specifically says that a death can be added to ITN only if there is consensus in the group. With so many oppositions, we definitely don't have a consensus. Admin: Please remove the posting from the ITN till a consensus is reached. Again, remember (as the critiera states) we are not a news website. Its not mandatory that we need to be quick posting stuff. -Natrajdr (talk) 14:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Every major international news source, including many blogs, have this news on it. Everything from NPR to FOX to the BBC have it as their top headline, with images. Also see 6000+ results on Google News and Google News top stories. No-brainer Support. Gosox5555 (talk) 14:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Support INT debates seem to attract both those too America-centric and those too America-paranoid. There's one reason that this story can be found on the front pages of most major news sites around the world, and that's because the Kennedy mystique is not limited to the US by any means. (As for international coverage, this is one of the top stories on Times of India and Xinhua) Joshdboz (talk) 14:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Well, for my 10 cents, I would have opposed. I thank Misplaced Pages for showing that Kennedy had died, as I have long been interested in his life and Misplaced Pages's information spurned me to turn on the TV and learn more, but he is a US senator. An important senator, yes, but he's not had a great worldwide impact in what he did during his life. I will go so far as to say I believe some US-centricism is behind the posting of Kennedy's death; I find it hard to believe something on the death of Tony Benn will be posted. Otumba (talk) 14:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose. Not in a major office, nor has he ever been, and the death was hardly unexpected. No major ramifications either. Modest Genius 14:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
The only correct thing you said is that the death was not unexpected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.37.216.66 (talkcontribs) 18:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
US Senator is not a major office of state, regardless of how long he held it. I was referring to positions such as head of state, head of government, or in charge of a major government ministry (eg foreign minister, treasury minister). Ted Kennedy never held any of those; he was an important legislator, but there are many of those, in many countries. Modest Genius 19:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Strong Support Highly infulential and clearly world-famous statesman and historical figure (in both US and Irish politics, at the very least). Clearly Misplaced Pages has a vocal anti-US minority who wants to silence any US stories on the front page, but in this case the man is clearly an icon far beyond the borders of his state. It is quite silly to see "In The News" not featuring a story on which President Obama is to address the nation. 80.193.130.5 (talk) 14:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Strong Support. I find this a ridiculous debate. Ted Kennedy is clearly a interntionally notable person. Posting it does not mean we have to put any US senator's death. His death is the lead story in just about every major news outlet of note (compared with the Ashes, which was not). Add nearly all Russian news media to the list of media that are covering this. I teach at a British school in Russia and my British and Russian colleagues informed me that Ted was dead right when it happened. This is a major international news item--end of story.--Johnsemlak (talk) 16:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Why does it take so long to add this? It seems like it just turns out as User:Lampman said: if we discuss this for a week, we're going to make ourselfs utter fools. --bender235 (talk) 15:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Actually, it was added a few hours ago. However, after a short while being up, it was removed on account of there not actually being a consensus here to add it. I suspect, seeing how this discussion is going, that no consensus will be reached to put it up. There's just too much opposition. Otumba (talk) 15:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose. Too US-centric. Non-notable politician. The only reason this is getting so much attention in Anglophone media is because the man was American. Offliner (talk) 15:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
If he is non-notable would you care to start the AfD? Joshdboz (talk) 16:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Cheeky, Joshdboz. :) Otumba (talk) 16:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Support One of the most prolific and longest-serving senators in U.S. history; his death has made international headlines, so this isn't U.S.-centric. It appears as though in trying to avoid a U.S. bias, ITN is actually becoming biased against U.S. topics. Cheers, Raime 15:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Strong Support. As has been mentioned above, the largest significance that Senator Kennedy's death holds is in the fact that the Democrats no longer have a filibuster-proof supermajority in the United States Senate, and will not have one again until January of next year, barring a change in Massachusetts law to allow a temporary appointment until after the special election. This means that the healthcare reform legislation currently dominating the national discussion in the U.S. will likely be on hold until then. This alone would probably be notable enough for ITN. Senator Franken's belated election victory was enough to make ITN if I recall, largely due to its supermajority implications, so I don't see why the loss of that supermajority would be any less noteworthy. The fact that Senator Kennedy was the last of a terrifically important dynasty in American politics, was universally recognized as being one of the most effective United States Senators in the Twentieth Century, and was a highly controversial figure in American politics due to his personal life as much as his political positions (he is invoked as a bogeyman by the right as much as, if not more than, he is invoked as a hero by the left), makes this a no-brainer. Here's a thought on a blurb:

Out of curiosity, why is the loss of the Democratic super-majority of any interest to the world? Misplaced Pages caters to the world, not just to an American audience. Otumba (talk) 17:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Extremely strong 'death to America' oppose. Come on, why are we discussing this? We all hate the US. We want more British-centric stuff on ITN. When is the next rugby match that we can put on ITN? Nutmegger (talk) 17:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

  • Strong Support What's with all the crazy anti-americanism? This is a wildly internationally notable individual, easily the most famous US senator, both for his incredibly wide-ranging legislative accomplishments (he is one of the world's most accomplished legislators) and his incredibly famous family. His immigration reforms of 1965 reshaped more than just America forever. His death fundamentally alters the composition of the legislature of the United States of America. This is rightfully one of the top news stories around the world today. It is sad to see anti-Americanism is more important than encyclopedic judgment at Misplaced Pages.


There's 347 Google News results for Ted Kennedy in France, 589 in Spain, and only 525 in the UK. This is not a lot when compared to the 11,805 in the US. This suggests to me that this does not have much worldwide impact or interest. (I know Google isn't an entirely reliable indicator, but it can be used as a small barometer).
As further evidence, Les Paul gets 8,472 French hits—a massive increase compared to Kennedy.
This, as well as the reasons given above, causes me to oppose the inclusion of this item. Dendodge T\ 17:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Les Paul's death was noted basically nowhere, while Kennedy's death is the No. 1 topic around the globe. I am from Germany, and Kennedy's death is reported as No. 1 news in every TV channel. --bender235 (talk) 17:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
I just did a search of Ted Kennedy at Google news UK and got over 9500 hits. Same with Google News Australia. Over 1000 hits (less, but a lot) at Google Noticias Mexico.--Johnsemlak (talk) 17:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Just for everyone who are arguing about super majority or whatever it is called. i just want to know if we should expect another item when they do get super majority again (which they just recieved after Al franken who did go up on ITN). or if they lose it again due to some other death or resignation then again when they regain it? because i really thought we used to only put head of state getting elected. Im sorry if it sounds "anti-american" but it seems we put up any changes in US government no matter what they are (super majority gain, loss, supreme court nominee, supreme court elect, senator elect etc etc). If this isnt US centric bias then i dont know what is. AND PLEASE stop showing google hits as they will not be a factor taken into account, never have before and never will. we are not google or news service. -- Ashish-g55 18:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
By the way, welcome to all these newcomers. In my few months on this page, have I seen such an avalanche of fresh contributors.  Cargoking  talk  18:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
I think if he were from any other country, any person who generated this much news coverage would by already posted in ITN without controversy. --Johnsemlak (talk) 18:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
No doubt about it. I'd never thought I'd be saying this, but I'm actually taken aback by the baseness of the anti-Americanism displayed here. The amount of inflammable comments and nigh-on uncivil cherry picking is downright embarrassing. I can't find a single oppose that is even remotely relevant to the criteria. Everything is either misrepresentation or "too much America". Maybe this is all just because the wrong people woke up on the wrong side of the bed on the wrong day, but it seems to me as if ITN is inherently incapable of handling deaths in any consistent manner.
Peter 19:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong support Seriously. Not having this on the main page and instead having beauty pageant contestants and cricket matches while every other news organization has been reporting this all day makes Wikinews, and Misplaced Pages by extension, look like a joke. Chuthya (talk) 18:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
ITN is not wikinews. and it is on front page first article on wikinews... -- Ashish-g55 18:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
That better? This event satisfies critera 1 and 2 of recent deaths, and arguably even criteria 2. This whole debate has been ridiculous. It shouldn't take the better part of a day to get this on the ITN section! Chuthya (talk) 19:36, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
(a) the deceased was in a high ranking office of power at the time of death, ->>> He was not head of state. which is what a politicians high rank needs to be for ITN.
(b) the deceased was a key figure in their field of expertise, and died unexpectedly or tragically, ->>>> died of brain cancer at age 77. The field being politician he was not head of state.
(c) the death has a major international impact that affects current events. The modification or creation of multiple articles to take into account the ramifications of a death is a sign that it meets the third criterion. ->>>>> Google hits does not qualify neither does front page of news sources. thats what wikinews is for. So by my count it fails to meet any criteria. -- Ashish-g55 19:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Nothing in the ITN Critera on Deaths states that it has to be a head of state. US Senator is one of the highest levels of power in US politics. Denying this fact displays a gross misunderstanding of the US political system. Chuthya (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Opposing because it's US-centric is just plain stupid, if we have a British or any other thing you almost never see, Oppose, too "british-centric". Kennedy was a major figure and the last living brother (?) of JFK thus he made an American impact, not sure how worldwide though.--Giants27 (c|s) 18:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Giants, what you have unwittengly done is highlight the US centricism that is so talked about in this discussion. You support the item because he had an impact in the US, irrelevant of his impact internationally. For someone to be notable enough to go on ITN they have to had a major impact on their field internationally. In political terms that sort of importance is reserved only for heads of state and political leaders and Kennedy was neither. Also, when will people understand the ITN is not a news service - it is not our responsibility to follow what CNN or the BBC or Le Monde do. Given that 99% of the time the top stories on these websites are no good for ITN (and we subsequently don't blindly follow them), why is it that this is what people are saying we should be doing now? --Daviessimo (talk) 19:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Kennedy not a political leader? You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. ++Lar: t/c 20:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Support. The absence of Senator Kennedy from the front page is
a glaring omission that has been troubling me all day, and I am frankly considering IAR'ing this and posting it within the next few minutes. Newyorkbrad (talk) 19:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
IAR on Main page is a really bad idea. Please, first read the comments of people who run ITN every day. --Tone 19:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
read the comments of people who run ITN every day OWN much? Thatcher 19:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
This is not the case. ITN has some guidelines and ITN people are more familiar with them. That's it. Also, TFA and DYK have guidelines. And several people have expressed their opinions why in this case the guidelines are not met. --Tone 19:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
As far as I can tell pretty much everyone opposing is doing an IAR by making highly imaginative interpretations of the death criteria or ignoring them altogether.
Peter 19:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't think I've ever seriously IAR'd in my three years here, but this seems like a fine place to start. The absence of this item from the mainpage today is indefensible. Any concerns about US-centricity are undercut by the fact that no other US-based items are listed on ITN right now. Newyorkbrad (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong Support Per above reasons. U.S.-centric should not be a valid argument for every news item brought up. Kennedy is just as notable as Les Paul, who was listed for days. Gage (talk) 19:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
  • oppose - it's far more important that we have the death of a Taliban leader and the crowning of this year's Miss whatever on the front page then the death of some US Senator. So what if he was brother of someone many consider their favorite US president, a perennial shadow candidate for president himself, scion of one of the leading political families of the east, sponsor of over 500 bils that made it into law and the third longest sitting US senator, the Ashes series in cricket is MUCH more important than that. ++Lar: t/c 19:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Not every US senator is important enough to be listed on ITN, I suppose, but this is frickin Ted Kennedy. He was a significant liberal voice in the Senate for 50 years. He killed someone and got away with it. He ran for President. Before his death he was the leading voice for health care reform which could affect 1/6th of the US economy. He passed and Overrode Ronald Regan's veto of the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986 (world-wide significance?) He was Knighted! Another blow against Misplaced Pages as a serious and credible information source. Thatcher 20:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
WP:ITN/DC clearly states:
A death should only be placed on ITN if it meets one of the following criteria:
(a) the deceased was in a high ranking office of power at the time of death
(b) the deceased was a key figure in their field of expertise, and died unexpectedly or tragically
(c) the death has a major international impact that affects current events. The modification or creation of multiple articles to take into account the ramifications of a death is a sign that it meets the third criterion.
Now as far as I can see no-one has explained how Kennedy's deaths meets any of these criteria. Arguments are limited to saying that he was very important in America and as such it is ITN worthy, saying his death is being followed by loads of news organisations across the globe and ITN should follow suit or saying that opposing on the grounds of US centricism is not a valid reason and as such should not stop this going up--Daviessimo (talk) 20:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Concur. It is unfortunate that accusations of anti-Americanism are now flying around, along with a threat at IAR, but it doesn't help that US-centricism accusations have been made by people, including me, for which I apologize. My basic point is that the criteria labelled above does not cover Kennedy; to put briefly, he was an important figure in the US, not in the world. Otumba (talk) 20:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
well i did explain in steps how it does not meet the criteria. the response was "US Senator is one of the highest levels of power in US politics", so i stopped replying. Im sorry but clearly people supporting dont even want to read why the item doesnt meet guidelines. i got nothing against US items or Kennedy. He was great senator sure but this news item is limited within US and logically if u post this u should be posting 2nd level (below head of state) politician deaths for entire world. Since we will clearly not do that then posting this item makes ITN US-centric by default. People comparing this to Les Paul should first find out that Les Paul was a musician who had worldwide impact and thats why it was posted. ITN is not breaking news or today's top stories. it needs to stay neutral (as much as possible) across whole world and for that reason it should not be posted (unless ofcourse all those supporting would like to come back and support every death of other countries 2nd level politicians. but most likely no one will be seen on ITN again and the regular people will have deal with the aftermath). -- Ashish-g55 20:27, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Moldova
  • The Moldovan government announces that it will stand down before the opening of parliament on Friday. A coalition of four opposition parties will then attempt to elect a president. This will (I think) result in the fall of Europe's last communist government. Could be mainpage-worthy on friday if not today. Source: (BBC) - Dumelow (talk) 17:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't think the standing down of the current government is in of itself notable enough to put on ITN. If, however, a new president is successfully elected, that is notable enough. Otumba (talk) 17:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


Iraq and Syria

Iraq and Syria have recalled their ambassadors to one another following the discovery of links between Syria and terrorism in Iraq. Relevant article is Iraq–Syria relations but it needs an update. Worthy of the mainpage? Source: (BBC) - Dumelow (talk) 17:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


Women's Equality Day

Just a placeholder that August 26 is Women's Equality Day in the U.S. Celebrating the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution which gave women the right to vote. I understand that ITN doesn't like American news and usually by accident favors photos of men. But just in case a woman wins something around then. TFA and DYK both have suggestions for this day, and I put a note into the WikiProject for OTD. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:18, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

You mean have a woman as the image? There doesn't seem anything wrong with that suggestion. Maybe if other countries have similar women's days and someone suggested they be included on those days also though. --candlewicke 00:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Yes. How sad it has to be a "woman's day" to get a photo on Misplaced Pages ITN though. :-) -SusanLesch (talk) 00:33, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

August 25

August 25, 2009 (2009-08-25) (Tuesday)

ITN candidates for August 25

Sorry I don't understand the difference. Wikinews's first sentence says homicide. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:18, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose. In any case, X says Y is not an appropriate ITN blurb. The story here is that Baitullah Mehsud died and this is where we use the death criteria. I don't think they are met here. --Tone 20:27, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
That's okay, but—and except that it is a Start-class and not a B-class article—it meets the death criteria:
  • a high ranking office of power, and had a significant contribution/impact on the country/region.
  • was a very important figure in their field of expertise, and was recognised as such.
  • has a major international impact that affects current events. The modification or creation of multiple articles to take into account the ramifications of a death is a sign that it meets the third criterion.
updates had to be and were made to this article, Hakimullah Mehsud, Wali-ur-Rehman and Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan. I said "Hakimullah said" to work him in as new leader. Other wordings welcome if it's worth it. -SusanLesch (talk) 22:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
I will write some Wikinews as this deserves a mention. -SusanLesch (talk) 01:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Almost done with wikinews:Pakistan Taliban say Baitullah Mehsud is dead. A hell of a lot of work to get around Tone's objection. -SusanLesch (talk) 02:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Support. Better late than never. ;-) Wikireader41 (talk) 02:36, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

 Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:05, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Well this one is a red link but let me guess—another qualifying tournament? --candlewicke 18:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
As the anon said this seems quite worthless so I'd just skip this part... –Howard the Duck 11:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
But should any of the others have time on the Main Page either? How can anyone decide if one is more "worthless" than another? --candlewicke 00:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Let's base it on FIBA World Rankings points: this one is worth 0.1 points for 1st place.(virtually worthless). A EuroBasket championship stated below is worth 1 point.
Probably not. However, shall we include Eurobasket (this will take place next month)? It's the second biggest international event in basketball, after the World c'ship (and Olympics, but those are less frequent). --Tone 20:27, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
This has now been delayed until August 26 (due to bad weather) - Dumelow (talk) 16:39, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Then we shall see tomorrow. We like space stories here ;-) --Tone 20:27, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
although nothing that exciting about shuttle launch this time.. a furnace and freezer lol. -- Ashish-g55 21:54, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Postponed again I'm afraid, some sort of problem with a valve or something. Next attempt on 28 August - Dumelow (talk) 16:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

August 24

August 24, 2009 (2009-08-24) (Monday)

ITN candidates for August 24

South Korea
  • Naro-1 has been launched at 8 00 UTC on August 25

South Korea successfully launches its first space rocket, Naro-1, orbiting the STSAT-2A satellite

Second launch attempt. First launch of a satellite by South Korea has happened at 8:00 UTC. I suggest it for ITN as soon as the successful launch is confirmed. Hektor (talk) 07:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Support as soon as the article is updated (still needs some fixes). --Tone 08:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Satellite separated. Launch seems to be successful. Hektor (talk) 08:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Posting. --Tone 09:44, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
It was a partial faliure! The satellite did not reach orbit. Should update. 76.65.23.203 (talk) 14:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
India
200 killed -- TouLouse (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Do we have an article? --Tone 19:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Sad reality that huge number of deaths in that country rarely get any coverage. The number is likely under-reported as well.

August 23

August 23, 2009 (2009-08-23) (Sunday)

ITN candidates for August 23

Miss Universe 2009

Stefanía Fernández of Venezuela wins the Miss Universe 2009 pagaent held at Atlantis Paradise Island, in Nassau, Bahamas.

We'd have an excuse to have pretty face for a few days... –Howard the Duck 03:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Support. it is "universe", cant get more diverse than that (also i think this should be ITNR). and partially for the reason mentioned above. -- Ashish-g55 17:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Support. An article appeared last year for this. Spencer 19:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Posting. Shall we put the image also if it is free? It has a tag at the moment. --Tone 19:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
boooo, whole point of this was so we can look at her for few days :) -- Ashish-g55 20:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Though I think the word Universe is POV here. I haven't seen any Andorians participating... And neither Vogon, luckily :P --Tone 20:15, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
pffft they dont stand a chance against her lol. nyways we have a free picture now it seems. put it up =D -- Ashish-g55 22:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


Korea
These are the ones which are the first time in two years? I'm not sure... has anything happened at these meetings? --candlewicke 17:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)


The Ashes
The Ashes Urn
The Ashes Urn
ENGLAND have now won the Ashes, so as soon as the articles are updated i support it going up on ITNJason Rees (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Suggested phrasing: The England cricket team defeats Australia at The Oval, thereby winning the Test series 2-1 and regaining The Ashes (pictured) Modest Genius 17:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose. I remember we did not have the result of one of the European football championship (was it UEFA cup?), therefore I think it is not appropriate to have the result of a match between two countries. --Tone 19:49, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Support The Ashes is a huge deal in cricket. It is the same as India vs Pakistan, only with a much longer and less politically charged history. Just because it only involves two nations shouldn't be an issue when events such as the Superbowl or AFL go up. Also we put the IPL up, which is a domestic league in cricket so I can't see any valid argument in opposition to this other than if it lacked an update. The UEFA Cup (which I nominated and wanted to see up) was rejected because there was also the Champions league to go up at the same time and people felt it was a second tier competition. There is no way you could ever call the Ashes a second tier cricket competition --Daviessimo (talk) 20:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Support. This is the biggest fixture in world cricket, and is listed on WP:ITNR. Modest Genius 20:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

The current suggestion seems a bit overlinked and confusing. How about the following? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

The England cricket team defeats Australia at The Oval, thereby winning the test series 2-1 and regaining The Ashes (pictured).
I'm not sure. It is listed at ITNR and yet Tone makes a good point too. I know it is at ITNR but is it truly above and beyond all others? Is there no higher level of cricket but a meeting of these two teams? And should India and Pakistan not be the one to post if it is therefore more politically charged? If India and Pakistan is more likely to be controversial I don't see why it might be left out—is it posted when it occurs? And, if this is not a second tier competition, it is presumably a first tier one in which case what tier is India and Pakistan? If both are first tier then there are at least two first tier—are there more than that, i.e. will someone else ask why their country is not represented at a later date and is it possible to provide them with a logical response as to why not? --candlewicke 20:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
The highest level of international cricket is Test cricket (there is also one-day and twenty20 international cricket, which are different forms of the game and have their own entries on ITNR). Test cricket is played as sets of bilateral series between the various Test nations - there is no centralised `championship'. To save putting up an entry for every test series (about 20 per year...) we just feature the two biggest and most important series, which are the Ashes and India v Pakistan. Both are listed on ITNR, and both have appeared on ITN previously. Just about anyone who knows anything about cricket will agree that these are the biggest Test series. Modest Genius 21:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
(ec) Well, I admit I am not adequately familiar with cricket to judge which are the world-top events. If this is the top one - now drawing the parallel with football - like UEFA European Football Championship (not the Cup), then I have no problems with having it on ITN. Maybe it would be a good idea to go through ITN/R cricket items and check what really is the top level. --Tone 21:17, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Now that I've just read the comment by Modest Genius, we have 4 cricket items on ITNR. For future reference, is that it or can we drop any or we need any more? --Tone 21:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
They look good to me. That's the top international event in ODI and T20 forms of the game (world cup every 4 years, T20 every 2 years), plus the two top Test series (averages every 2 years each). Makes ~1.75 stories per year. Modest Genius 21:32, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
I've just clarified the ITNR section, though didn't change the entries. Modest Genius 21:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I think this is fine now. Posting, just without the result since it is standard ITN practice not to include it. Someone please upload the photo. --Tone 21:49, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Actually, I am not perfectly happy with the article updates yet so it can go up when this is ready. --Tone 21:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Just for the record, it seems we have an article dedicated to the 2009 Ashes series as well as the Australian cricket team in England in 2009 one that was used in the above wording suggestions. I think it would be more appropriate to use the Ashes one rather than the summary of the entire tour, which includes limited-overs games, which are a separate competition and might be confusing. 87.115.38.226 (talk) 22:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

That article was a redirect when the suggestion was made above. It's been expanded using material taken from the tour article. But yes, it's probably more appropriate. Modest Genius 22:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
I dunno but FIBA Asia Championship 2009 had WAY MORE views (view for a certain day had around 80% of the The Ashes' July 2008 total, but only up until the quarterfinals) and that wasn't posted. –Howard the Duck 00:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

August 22

August 22, 2009 (2009-08-22) (Saturday)

ITN candidates for August 22

Sayano–Shushenskaya

According to the latest news, the death toll reached to 6466. Could anybody update the current news on the main page? Beagel (talk) 05:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Is that not a bit old now?  Cargoking  talk  12:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't see it was already there. If we can find a admin to update...  Cargoking  talk  12:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Done by Tone. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
There is now an article.
plus Added. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)


Women's Professional Soccer

Not sure if I'm doing this correctly, but the championship of the Women's Professional Soccer league had been decided by a 1-0 victory by Sky Blue FC over LA Sol. Should be included as this is the premier league for women's football with many international players.Rhodesisland (talk) 05:53, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't think this is good enough both before and after checking the country in which these teams and league were located. --candlewicke 06:48, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

August 21

August 21, 2009 (2009-08-21) (Friday)

ITN candidates for August 21

Powerful women
not really ITN material. PS: please sign your posts thanks -- Ashish-g55 14:07, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose. Hardly ITN worthy. Just something by some magazine.  Cargoking  talk  15:25, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Same as above. --candlewicke 16:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


Somali military forces engage Islamist militants in Mogadishu, Somalia, with 21 dead and 40 injured.

I'm supporting this one. I'll expand the entry in a bit, just got to do some RL stuff first. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 19:35, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Before you do (or after if it be the case), how abnormal is this for Somalia? --candlewicke 22:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
To be honest, not very; it's part of a battle that's been going on since the beginning of this year. I'm assuming that will lead to a "no"? :P Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 03:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Well, just looking at the infobox, a death toll of 21 looks a bit small to me when compared to figures of 500, 1,600, 223,000, 82, 72. I know it wouldn't be notable for Iraq anyway and it seems Somalia is in a similar situation (it just doesn't get as much press coverage unfortunately). --candlewicke 04:40, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
See? :) At least five more dead one day later. :( It's just that nobody notices outside Africa. --candlewicke 08:23, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

August 20

August 20, 2009 (2009-08-20) (Thursday)

ITN candidates for August 20

Ontario Tornadoes
well this is fairly rare for toronto. but i will stay neutral for this one since the tornado was like a km from where i was... me supporting will prolly have some bias in it lol ;) -- Ashish-g55 15:38, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


Presidential election


Parliamentary election


Fischer–Tropsch process
Promising, but no, not yet. I'd wait 'til they actually do it. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 07:23, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


Tianyuraptor
Might be too old. The date on the URL is 14 August, the oldest ITN is 16 August. "Received July 7, 2009. Accepted July 24, 2009" at the bottom doesn't help there either. --candlewicke 18:09, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't understand what you mean by the 14th of August. On the journal page, it says "Published online before print August 19, 2009", so the paper was only accessible yesterday. The received and accepted dates are common in technical literature and can sometimes span up to three months. There is no way to have known of this paper's existence before yesterday (unless you were the peer-reviewers or authors), and the release date of the paper to the public is more important than the date where only a few select people even know of the dinosaur. --Spotty 19:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
This is tasty. I'll post it up in a bit. No chance of an image, I assume? Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 19:12, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Unfortunately not for Misplaced Pages, as I believe all images are under copyright by the PNAS. There is an image here if you want to see what the fossil looks like, but its listed as being under "Fair use"
Oh, BTW, I just wanted to let you know that under the ICZN naming conventions, scientific names are to be italicized here possible. Could you italicize it? Thanks! --Spotty 19:21, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I did see those three dates though. Better to be certain. --candlewicke 19:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Not a problem! :) --Spotty 19:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


Usain Bolt new 200m world record
Agree. It should either replace or combine with the old one. Deserted Cities 18:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
I'd say combine it. --bender235 (talk) 18:52, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Sure. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 18:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
move it up though. its like 5 items down. considering this happened today and everything is ordered by time it should be moved up. -- Ashish-g55 19:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
I'd prefer keeping it where it is. In any case, there should be a consistency in the blurb, 100m links to world record progression and 200m links to the event. --Tone 19:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


26 dead on election day; Afghans vote in 2009 election under guard from 300,000 soldiers linkage
Though I'm tempted to wait until the victor is announced... Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 18:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
I say mention it when it's announced. An accurate death toll might be available then through hindsight. --candlewicke 19:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


Lockerbie bomber Released
Major political event concerning the worst terrorist attack on British soil. Ixistant (talk) 21:16, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Not really for ITN in my opinion. Being released on compassionate ground isn't especially new or unusual. I don't think his death would make it either. --candlewicke 00:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
If it's not unusual why do I see it being the top story all over BBC, CNN. It should be on ITN given the massive amount of response generated, diplomacy and controversy it has. - Mailer Diablo 19:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
It's got no chance of getting on ITN when there is a NPOV tag on the article. However, if that was fixed I think there is a valid argument to say it is a major event, because it will likely have repecussion on both US and UK relations with Libya. More than one political commentator on the news has suggested that the actions of the UK, via the Scottish government, may have been influenced by the big pot of oil sitting below Libya. But as I've said NPOV = No ITN --Daviessimo (talk) 19:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
I think it does have potential if something else happens but not right now in my opinion. It doesn't matter if it's all over BBC and CNN as that's not how ITN works. They need news of any sort to attract readers and viewers, Misplaced Pages and ITN need something more. And it's not unusual because "compassionate ground" has already been all over BBC, CNN, etc at least once this month. --candlewicke 22:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
well story has attracted quite a bit of worldwide attention since libya started celebrating his release and US and UK were getting mad about it. even though the blurb will not state that but it maybe a good reason to post it. -- Ashish-g55 00:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Must been slow news day here then! - Mailer Diablo 02:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
The NPOV issues have to worked out first. Otherwise, this is an "up-to-date encyclopedic content reflecting important international current events" which can be added here. –Howard the Duck 05:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Roll call of coverage: Morocco, Peru, Kenya, Mexico, Vietnam, Monaco and perhaps a hundred others. –Howard the Duck 05:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Category:
Misplaced Pages:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions Add topic