| Revision as of 05:29, 7 September 2009 editChicago Smooth (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users644 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:11, 7 September 2009 edit undoTheserialcomma (talk | contribs)3,804 edits Reverted 1 edit by Chicago Smooth; Its an archived debate. please open a new POINTy AFD if you must, but do not modify the archive. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| *'''Keep''' Ross Jeffries is definitely a notable person. Article needs to be redacted though. ] 14:27, 7 October 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' Ross Jeffries is definitely a notable person. Article needs to be redacted though. ] 14:27, 7 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' very notable ] 07:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' very notable ] 07:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Very weak sources. This person is not notable at all. ] (]) 05:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an ]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an ]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div> | ||
Revision as of 07:11, 7 September 2009
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Hermione1980 22:26, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Ross Jeffries
Delete Not notable Adcruft DutchSeduction 10:39, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, advertising. — JIP | Talk 10:44, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: he does get a lot of Google results, though the article is pretty terrible. Also, was there an AfD recently that concerned him or his work? I didn't see one in the edit history. -- Kjkolb 13:39, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Compare to the article Seduction Community that recently went AfD and was removed. It is now WP:VfU at VfU. Another terribly written article is David DeAngelo, another commercial seduction community guy. There should be one NPOV article to explain the social phenomenon which is kept linkspam and adcruft free. DutchSeduction 15:05, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, cleanup, and copyedit. This figure is notable as well. I'm not sure why this collection of articles receives so many deletion votes based on poor editing when many other articles on Misplaced Pages have been sitting in cleanup for years. Jeffries is notable. Let's fix some of the errors without resorting to an unnecessary deletion. --Quintin3265 16:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep only if edited into an NPOV article. If it remains objectionable adcruft Delete Dlyons493 Talk 20:24, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. The guy the Tom Cruise character in Magnolia was based on should have a Misplaced Pages article. Taco Deposit | Talk-o to Taco 22:09, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and continue to develop. Does not garner the same amount of attention on Google as David DeAngelo does, but this person still appears to be more than reasonably notable within his field. Hall Monitor 22:41, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. Take note: In 'The Game' by Neill Strauss, Paul Thomas Anderson is said to have studied Ross Jeffries while writing Magnolia. 24.22.189.60 04:47, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Ross Jeffries is definitely a notable person. Article needs to be redacted though. Intersofia 14:27, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep very notable Klonimus 07:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.