| Revision as of 06:11, 21 September 2009 editSnowded (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,634 edits →Would you check?← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:54, 21 September 2009 edit undoJeni (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,424 edits →Removal of speedy template on M2 motorway: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| Sorry to bother you, but this ] appears to be have been found guilty of being a sock puppet, but is still actively editing as can be seen . You know the pages and their background hence the request to you rather than an ANI report. The various pages are confused when I try and trace back the actions. I didn't think you could be temporarily blocked for being a sock? --] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 06:10, 21 September 2009 (UTC) | Sorry to bother you, but this ] appears to be have been found guilty of being a sock puppet, but is still actively editing as can be seen . You know the pages and their background hence the request to you rather than an ANI report. The various pages are confused when I try and trace back the actions. I didn't think you could be temporarily blocked for being a sock? --] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 06:10, 21 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Removal of speedy template on ] == | |||
| Can I please ask why you removed the speedy template on ]. ] continued to remove it despite her being the page creator. She has created an inappropriate disambiguation page, completely ignoring the existing ]. Do you believe that her actions are correct and that the proper disambiguation page shouldn't be in the correct place? <span style="font-family:Papyrus">]</span> <sup>(])</sup> 19:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:54, 21 September 2009
Your mileage may vary.
NEGATIVE!!!!!!!!!!!
STOP being negative about me. And why did you have to delete the indy montage! Sedna10387 00:54, 8 September 2009
Protection
You can unprotect Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration/Poll on Ireland article names if you like, as the user causing the disruption, MickMacNee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), is now blocked. Cirt (talk) 16:27, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. Cirt (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Clarifacation
The 3rr policy notes that exceptions can be
- Obvious vandalism – edits which any well-intentioned user would immediately agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding cruel or offensive language. Legitimate content changes, adding or removing tags, edits against consensus, and similar actions are not exempt. Administrators should block persistent vandals and protect pages subject to vandalism from many users, rather than repeatedly reverting. However, non-administrators may have to revert vandalism repeatedly before administrators can respond.
If I am to hold back maybe we should reword this policy to make it less ambigous in it's intent. It would seem that making personal attacks here is generally construed by the majority as vandalism. In any case I in no way meant to violate the rule and was acting per the above blurb. ty for not blocking me. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Also per your reasoning on ANi, is an Article Talkspace considered within an article?
- There is a clear policy on Misplaced Pages of no personal attacks, and harassing other contributors is also not allowed. While some forms of harassment are also clear cases of vandalism, such as user page vandalism, or inserting a personal attack into an article, harassment in itself is not considered "vandalism" and should be handled differently. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:43, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Do you have a few minutes to explain things here?Hell In A Bucket (talk) 19:24, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Would you check?
Sorry to bother you, but this User appears to be have been found guilty of being a sock puppet, but is still actively editing as can be seen here. You know the pages and their background hence the request to you rather than an ANI report. The various pages are confused when I try and trace back the actions. I didn't think you could be temporarily blocked for being a sock? --Snowded 06:10, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Removal of speedy template on M2 motorway
Can I please ask why you removed the speedy template on M2 motorway. User:Sarah777 continued to remove it despite her being the page creator. She has created an inappropriate disambiguation page, completely ignoring the existing M2 motorway (disambiguation). Do you believe that her actions are correct and that the proper disambiguation page shouldn't be in the correct place? Jeni 19:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC)