Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:34, 4 October 2009

Welcome!

Hello, Vanisheduser5965, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jokestress (talk) 22:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

ENDA

Sorry DarlieB. Trans folks have been left at the curb nearly every step by nearly every LGBT group at one point or another. The ENDA was just a mess to begin with and a last ditch effort, IMHO, to get anything on the books. Why they though it would work is really beyond me but Frank is quite the genius at getting things done so I credit him for trying. I suggest working on the ENDA article itself if that's where your interest lies or pick other articles especially about people and subject you really enjoy. It will be a little bit more pleasant for you and you can get more familiar with how Misplaced Pages works while researching subjects that aren't as stressful. -- Banjeboi 16:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Talk:The Man Who Would Be Queen

There is a template on the top of the page in question advising all parties to confine their discussion to the material of the article. Your commentary has rather frequently been in violation of those talk page guidelines, and I believe your comments would be much better received if you were to actually follow the rules of talk pages, as per WP:TPG. I look forward to seeing your future comments more in keeping with the existing guidelines. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate your concern over my ability to contribute to TMWWBQ. In normal circumstances I would agree and continue but I'm afraid this article being edited by Dr Bailey's co-workers and supporters degrades it beyond being worth working on . It's no more than a sham set up to try and clear the good doctor of charges that have left his career in a shambles. My editing is against that sacred purpose and as such no matter what I did to improve the article and it will be removed . It is filled with false facts ( probably put back in by now ) , lies and blatant exclusions and manipulation of truth . When I came on there were no less than five full references to Dreger under different names trying to hid that she said it , misidentifying gay magazines as LGBT, Bailey sources writing reviews of the same book that they appear in  ! Unqualified reviewers who were Baileys collaborators . This article will never be honest or properly constructed. It should be about the book, not an apologists version of how Dr Bailey and his sainthood . Entire sections babbling on about Dregers "theories on the injustice to Bailey " and nothing on the book, or even to explain the IRB or what it meant to Dr Baileys approach to the research. After two years of trying to be neutral I totally lost neutrality so what's the point ? These aren't editors, they are Baileys sycophants and employees. Let them try to rewrite the truth, it will only delay the truth coming . Misplaced Pages is just a bunch of people enforcing their sourced point of view , it has nothing to do with fact. Thanks though. DarlieB (talk) 23:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

I just visited the article and as I predicted, it's nothing but fabricated baloney based on Bailey followers terror. A true reflection of why we import intelligent people here in the US . There are none to be found natively. DarlieB (talk) 23:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Stupidity

"Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe. "-Frank Zappa DarlieB (talk) 22:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

—slakr 05:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Vanisheduser5965 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you remove the block immediately tomorrow and after I remove my personal info from the Road to Multiverse discussion area I will request total deletion of this account. You have intentionally harassed me to the point where I no longer wish to be associated with wiki.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  • understand what you have been blocked for,
  • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information.  Sandstein  08:57, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vanisheduser5965 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I can address your concerns:

A)I will make no edits other than to remove from the discussion area links to my personal site used for verification. I actually believed, being the animator that animated the FG Disney Parody would verify the fact that Greg Colton was actually speaking on CartoonBrew . He's my director and we emailed back and forth while the discussion was going on , discussing the comments. It was a silly assumption as the actual people who do this work are totally useless on wiki. You need it in some article , misinterpreted and misquoted (I've been misquoted so many times I can't count ). Really, it was my mistaken assumption that it mattered . I stand totally corrected .

B)The original block was for edit warring,that I agree I did , a fourth reversion and got blocked. The appeal was never a denial.

C) The fact I'm willing to close my account permanently addresses both why it would no longer be necessary and my willingness to avoid more disruption. Self sacrificing don't you think ? The puppet thing is all yours, does it matter ? I'll be gone and you can block as many people you think are me as you want but they wont be me . I have no interest in this site, the article or anything here.

D) Honestly, I have nothing more to contribute here at all so you would be doing both wiki and I a huge favor. I don't believe in wiki anymore ,I think that is both our problem and this is the best resolution . Nothing here strikes me as worth contributing to nor have I the energy to argue with people who don't know what they are talking about. By the way, you must see the humor in arguing with fanboys about something you actually animated .

I think the fact I would be permanently leaving solves everyone's problems don't you ? Why would you think forcing me to wait a week would make anything better ? Is there some reason you can think of that shows it has a benefit ? I mean , I'm having the account deleted so exactly what more do you want ?

Decline reason:

As you have said you intend to leave, an unblock is clearly not necessary. It is not technically possible for an account to be deleted. --Anthony.bradbury 14:45, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vanisheduser5965 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Huh ? Permanently disabling is deleting , I wont be able to access it ever again and you know it. Once more ,what benefit is there to anyone making everyone wait a week ? Let me get my personal info off and close this account. My crime is reverting an edit one time too many times , not murder . I've already admitted that. http://answers.wikia.com/How_can_i_delete_my_wiki_account "Due to the way the software is designed and how contributions are tracked and recorded, deleting an account isn't possible, but staff can disable it if you ask them using special:contact. Disabling an account permanently locks you out of the account and scrambles your password. This is irreversible and does not remove any edits you have made."  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Huh ? Permanently disabling is deleting , I wont be able to access it ever again and you know it. Once more ,what benefit is there to anyone making everyone wait a week ? Let me get my personal info off and close this account. My crime is reverting an edit one time too many times , not murder . I've already admitted that. http://answers.wikia.com/How_can_i_delete_my_wiki_account "Due to the way the software is designed and how contributions are tracked and recorded, deleting an account isn't possible, but staff can disable it if you ask them using special:contact. Disabling an account permanently locks you out of the account and scrambles your password. This is irreversible and does not remove any edits you have made."  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Huh ? Permanently disabling is deleting , I wont be able to access it ever again and you know it. Once more ,what benefit is there to anyone making everyone wait a week ? Let me get my personal info off and close this account. My crime is reverting an edit one time too many times , not murder . I've already admitted that. http://answers.wikia.com/How_can_i_delete_my_wiki_account "Due to the way the software is designed and how contributions are tracked and recorded, deleting an account isn't possible, but staff can disable it if you ask them using special:contact. Disabling an account permanently locks you out of the account and scrambles your password. This is irreversible and does not remove any edits you have made."  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Requests for unblock