Misplaced Pages

User talk:Vanisheduser5965: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:12, 5 October 2009 editVanisheduser5965 (talk | contribs)608 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:32, 5 October 2009 edit undoVanisheduser5965 (talk | contribs)608 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Wiki rules:

"Blocks are not intended for use in retaliation, as punishment, or where there is no current conduct issue which is of concern."


Riiiiiiiiiiiiggghhht! ] (]) 22:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)




<div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:1 week|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} for {{#if:]: continuing to edit war using a sock (]) while blocked|''']: continuing to edit war using a sock (]) while blocked'''|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You are welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. {{#if:|]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 05:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> &mdash;]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 05:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC) <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:1 week|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} for {{#if:]: continuing to edit war using a sock (]) while blocked|''']: continuing to edit war using a sock (]) while blocked'''|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You are welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. {{#if:|]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 05:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> &mdash;]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 05:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)



Revision as of 22:32, 5 October 2009

Wiki rules:

"Blocks are not intended for use in retaliation, as punishment, or where there is no current conduct issue which is of concern."


Riiiiiiiiiiiiggghhht! Vanisheduser5965 (talk) 22:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)



You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Block evasion: continuing to edit war using a sock (User:WLPERD) while blocked. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

slakr 05:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanisheduser5965 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If you remove the block immediately tomorrow and after I remove my personal info from the Road to Multiverse discussion area I will request total deletion of this account. You have intentionally harassed me to the point where I no longer wish to be associated with wiki.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    • understand what you have been blocked for,
    • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information.  Sandstein  08:57, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanisheduser5965 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I think I can address your concerns:

A)I will make no edits other than to remove from the discussion area links to my personal site used for verification. I actually believed, being the animator that animated the FG Disney Parody would verify the fact that Greg Colton was actually speaking on CartoonBrew . He's my director and we emailed back and forth while the discussion was going on , discussing the comments. It was a silly assumption as the actual people who do this work are totally useless on wiki. You need it in some article , misinterpreted and misquoted (I've been misquoted so many times I can't count ). Really, it was my mistaken assumption that it mattered . I stand totally corrected .

B)The original block was for edit warring,that I agree I did , a fourth reversion and got blocked. The appeal was never a denial.

C) The fact I'm willing to close my account permanently addresses both why it would no longer be necessary and my willingness to avoid more disruption. Self sacrificing don't you think ? The puppet thing is all yours, does it matter ? I'll be gone and you can block as many people you think are me as you want but they wont be me . I have no interest in this site, the article or anything here.

D) Honestly, I have nothing more to contribute here at all so you would be doing both wiki and I a huge favor. I don't believe in wiki anymore ,I think that is both our problem and this is the best resolution . Nothing here strikes me as worth contributing to nor have I the energy to argue with people who don't know what they are talking about. By the way, you must see the humor in arguing with fanboys about something you actually animated .

I think the fact I would be permanently leaving solves everyone's problems don't you ? Why would you think forcing me to wait a week would make anything better ? Is there some reason you can think of that shows it has a benefit ? I mean , I'm having the account deleted so exactly what more do you want ?

Decline reason:

As you have said you intend to leave, an unblock is clearly not necessary. It is not technically possible for an account to be deleted. --Anthony.bradbury 14:45, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanisheduser5965 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Huh ? Permanently disabling is deleting , I wont be able to access it ever again and you know it. Once more ,what benefit is there to anyone making everyone wait a week ? Let me get my personal info off and close this account. My crime is reverting an edit one time too many times , not murder . I've already admitted that. http://answers.wikia.com/How_can_i_delete_my_wiki_account "Due to the way the software is designed and how contributions are tracked and recorded, deleting an account isn't possible, but staff can disable it if you ask them using special:contact. Disabling an account permanently locks you out of the account and scrambles your password. This is irreversible and does not remove any edits you have made."

Decline reason:

This isn't Wikia, chummer, sorry. Whatever applies to Wikia wikis doesn't necessarily apply to Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The analogous page here is Right-to-vanish, but that is only done by the user wanting to vanish (no administrator interference is necessary) and only if he's in good standing with the community. -Jeremy 20:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanisheduser5965 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok Jeremy has agreed to help get my name change and I am prepped on how to close out the account. I have no intention of reverting or editing anything . I would prefer to do this all quickly but I'm prepared to wait the week since it takes a while to get the name change . This should close all issues.

Decline reason:

Who is Jeremy? Hiberniantears (talk) 02:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanisheduser5965 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Jeremy is an Admin like you Hiberniantears . He submitted a name change for me so I can close this account once the block expires . If you look above or below he has posted there. This is a funny situation when you think of it. Like high school , there are all these rules that in the real world mean absolutely nothing and like high school you have to endure them till you get out. The only reason for the unblock request was to get it over with but people need their control.

Decline reason:

This is not a request for unblock. To close this account, just stop using it. Continued abouse of this template will cause this page to be protected. Note also that "the right to vanish might not be extended to users who have been abusive or disruptive", which includes you.  Sandstein  05:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Mr Sandstein, I abused nothing . The Admin Hiberniantears asked "Who is Jeremy?" and I replied . You will be rid of me soon enough and you can control your little world . How dull your life must be without us awful criminals taking that delicious extra revert ! 13 million children in the US go to bed hungry and live in poverty Mr Sandstein , my apologies if I find that kind of melodramatic depiction of abuse petty . I'll wait till the block is up , delete all the comments, leave the tag and be on my way.Vanisheduser5965 (talk) 06:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC)


To clarify: We cannot delete your account, nor are we permitted to disable it for you here. The onus would be on you to scramble your password and walk away. -Jeremy 20:32, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
There should be a warning saying "If you join you can never leave !" DarlieB (talk) 20:52, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Ok I found it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Right_to_vanish All I want to do is get off the site permanently. I don't want another account or to have anything to do with wiki.DarlieB (talk) 21:15, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

So basically I leave this template, make a request to the "bureaucrats" asking for a name change .


This editor has decided to leave Misplaced Pages.
So someone explain why we have to wait a week ? I'm sorry, I just don't get it . DarlieB (talk) 21:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


I can file a namechange request on your behalf (Only if the name has already been taken will it take a week for a name change). As for the personal information, send an email to our oversight team or our OTRS team with permalinks to every instance where you revealed your personal information, making sure to explain the situation to them clearly and calmly. As I stated above, the only person who can scramble your password is yourself; admins will not do it for you (again, Wikia is a separate entity from the Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Misplaced Pages). -Jeremy 22:07, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Well that is fine Jeremy . In the end it works out as the block lasts a week and the name is changed by the block end. I will delete my references , add the user has left sign and then scramble the password. Could you request the change to USER111111 or whatever you think is as generic  ? Once I'm back on I can do the minor deletes myself then send the email to ovesights . I don't need to be on to do that. Cool, thanks for the help. DarlieB (talk) 22:35, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Oh , one more thing Jeremy, is there a way to get them to permanently lock this user page ? DarlieB (talk) 22:45, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
There is, but indefinite talk page protection is only used for excessive abuse of the talk page or if the user is a sockpuppet of a vandal known to systematically abuse their TP. I've already filed the request; see WP:CHU. -Jeremy 23:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
I've been blocked 3 times in 2 years for going 1 revert too far but that's about it =) You lose count after a while , I suppose thats like putting parking tickets in your glove compartment . I thought I would ask but it will be another name so I doubt it's necessary . Thank you so much Jeremy for doing that  ! DarlieB (talk) 00:30, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Vanisheduser5965 . Excellent  ! DarlieB (talk) 00:33, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

And the name's been changed. Now all you need to do is scramble the pass and you're free. -Jeremy 05:19, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much Jeremy. You are a very, very kind person and I will do that. I really do appreciate it. If you are ever on YT , I'm darliegoddess . Good luck !Vanisheduser5965 (talk) 06:12, 5 October 2009 (UTC)


Disabling Request Sent

This has been submitted by email. community@wikia.com

Hi, I'm the evil criminal DarlieB, I reverted a section on the Family Guy "Road to the Multiverse " episode , that I worked on , one too many times and was blocked. I'm really tired of wiki and want to just get my personal info off and then have the entire account permanently disabled . I think this is a reasonable request but I can't get the editors to just close the issue. Help to get them to see that it's best for everyone and not waste any more time. Thanks

DarlieB

P.S. Also at this point they have permanently disabled someone else's account , who is not me, because I asked them to look over that same article and they were accused of being a "sock". Something the other editors in this edit warr were doing. You merely have to look at the three talk sections. They are all friends. I suppose because I was blocked they assumed it was me but whatever.


FisherQueen

Remember that Misplaced Pages is anonymous, so we don't really know for sure whether you are that animator, or some rival of the animator's, or a mentally ill fan who believes himself to be the animator. That's why we rely on published sources rather than individual knowledge- because we know how unhappy you would be if someone pretending to be you added incorrect information about your field to Misplaced Pages. I'm sorry that you've had a negative experience at Misplaced Pages, but that rule is so fundamental a part of how we do things that we aren't able to change it, even if we really do believe (and I do) that you are who you say that you are. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 10:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


I found this in the history and thought it was worth the reply ( though I'll probably get blocked ten more weeks for reposting it back to my talk ) . Thank you FisherQueen , that's one who believes =) Simply replying to the email at my posted website would have confirmed it as I doubt anyone would spend time loading the hundreds of drawings and assembling the ten minutes of my 177 mgb reel . The email is trackable as well though it's not the one I use for this account. My regular is already a spam magnet. ( I also uploaded a pencil test that no one but the animator could have, even named it after the person doubting ). To be honest what I found was not so much negative as disappointing . None of what is in that Family Guy "Road to the Multiverse " wiki is sourced. Not one single thing yet it's there and someone just put a tag saying "Help us source it ". Do you delete everything ? I mean rules say that any unsourced material should immediately be removed don't they ? Apparently not if you are pals. Wiki is just a source of opinion based around some loose rules. Truth belongs to "whoever is the winner". I'm looking back on the years I spent here now as a total waste and I have much , much better things to do with my time. Anyway, it as more enlightening that negative so don't feel bad. Was nice of you to write. Thank you. DarlieB (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Category:
User talk:Vanisheduser5965: Difference between revisions Add topic