| Revision as of 14:21, 18 December 2005 editSjschen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,530 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 22:17, 27 December 2005 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits ReichNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| I agree completely, and I will have the remember this quote for the future since it IS so well put. However, I can't agree with you comment on changing cat. "Pseudoscience" to something else. :) -- ] 14:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC) | I agree completely, and I will have the remember this quote for the future since it IS so well put. However, I can't agree with you comment on changing cat. "Pseudoscience" to something else. :) -- ] 14:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==Reich== | |||
| Hi, I left a note on the talk page explaining why I reverted the intro, although I had lots of other reasons e.g. unexplained deletion of details. An edit that extensive made by an anon without explanation and no sourcing will almost always be reverted. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 22:17, 27 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:17, 27 December 2005
Well put!
"I believe that controversial topics should be treated from every point of view, instead of looking for an unattainable consensus."
I agree completely, and I will have the remember this quote for the future since it IS so well put. However, I can't agree with you comment on changing cat. "Pseudoscience" to something else. :) -- Sjschen 14:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Reich
Hi, I left a note on the talk page explaining why I reverted the intro, although I had lots of other reasons e.g. unexplained deletion of details. An edit that extensive made by an anon without explanation and no sourcing will almost always be reverted. SlimVirgin 22:17, 27 December 2005 (UTC)