Revision as of 15:15, 15 June 2009 editJaguarjaguar (talk | contribs)129 edits →Literary allusions: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:52, 10 December 2009 edit undoXenobot Mk V (talk | contribs)393,887 editsm Bot) Tag and assess for WP:WPUKPOL - May inherit class from other projects (report errors?) (Plugin++) Added {{WP UK Politics}}.Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | ||
{{WP UK Politics|class=Start|auto=inherit|importance=}} | |||
{{WPLondon|nested=yes|class=start|importance=Mid}} | {{WPLondon|nested=yes|class=start|importance=Mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject Museums|nested=yes|class=start|importance=Mid}} |
{{WikiProject Museums|nested=yes|class=start|importance=Mid}}}} | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 01:52, 10 December 2009
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
References
I can't seem to get the references listed in the References Section, anyone help?--81.106.79.133 11:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Peacocky sentence
I have removed this sentence:
"The Wallace Collection sits favourably amongst a group of private collections, primarily European, which include; The Royal Collection, as the greatest private collection in the world, Waddesdon Manor, the Bowes Museum, Herrenchiemsee, Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Frick Collection and the Liechtenstein Museum."
This serves no purpose but to puff the collection. Sits favourably? What does that mean. Is this a list of private collections? If so, then we should just put a link in the "see also" section to a list of private collections. Just listing these names serves no real purpose. It was claimed that the facts are not in dispute; I don't see any facts to dispute, just a list of vaguely explained names. Why pick (only) these? This list smacks of original research. --Eyrian 16:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Literary allusions
The Wallace collection comes up in loads and loads of novels, particularly; I'm thinking most obviously of Iris Murdoch and Anthony Powell but I'm certain there are tons of others. Someone should make a section on this and if no one else does I will in a longish time
Jaguarjaguar (talk) 15:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Categories: