| Revision as of 09:24, 1 January 2006 editIZAK (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,945 edits welcome← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:35, 2 January 2006 edit undoShalomShlomo (talk | contribs)1,260 edits →Aaron-Zalman ConflictNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Please try to understand: I don't want you to concede, I want you to grow up and discuss how an NPOV compromise can be reached. You prefer to throw a tantrum. I am contributing information that has been reported on. The newspaper articles about the Satmar fistfights are uncontrovertibly true. The legal fights over Satmar property and legal guardianship of the Satmar rebbe are also true; I found a copy of the court records and posted a link to it. '''Just because you don't like something doesn't make it untrue.''' Vandalizing someone else's remarks in the talk section? How's that going by the Wiki spirit? You seem to think that you're the only person here with valid opinions or positions. If something offends you, it '''has''' to be changed. Too bad, that's not how this place works. Bottom line: you've got no business lecturing anyone on respect. Have a very happy Yule. Sorry... Yoel.] 22:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC) | Please try to understand: I don't want you to concede, I want you to grow up and discuss how an NPOV compromise can be reached. You prefer to throw a tantrum. I am contributing information that has been reported on. The newspaper articles about the Satmar fistfights are uncontrovertibly true. The legal fights over Satmar property and legal guardianship of the Satmar rebbe are also true; I found a copy of the court records and posted a link to it. '''Just because you don't like something doesn't make it untrue.''' Vandalizing someone else's remarks in the talk section? How's that going by the Wiki spirit? You seem to think that you're the only person here with valid opinions or positions. If something offends you, it '''has''' to be changed. Too bad, that's not how this place works. Bottom line: you've got no business lecturing anyone on respect. Have a very happy Yule. Sorry... Yoel.] 22:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Hi, I've posted what I think could be a potential compromise (or the start of one) at the talk page for ]. Please take a look and let me know what you think. Please also accept my apologies for the confrontational tone above and at the various discussion pages. ] 07:35, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:35, 2 January 2006
Welcome and Shulem Uleichem
Welcome!
Hi Rebbeshe Kneesocks! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! und nur altz gietz! IZAK 09:24, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Aaron-Zalman Conflict
Please try to understand: I don't want you to concede, I want you to grow up and discuss how an NPOV compromise can be reached. You prefer to throw a tantrum. I am contributing information that has been reported on. The newspaper articles about the Satmar fistfights are uncontrovertibly true. The legal fights over Satmar property and legal guardianship of the Satmar rebbe are also true; I found a copy of the court records and posted a link to it. Just because you don't like something doesn't make it untrue. Vandalizing someone else's remarks in the talk section? How's that going by the Wiki spirit? You seem to think that you're the only person here with valid opinions or positions. If something offends you, it has to be changed. Too bad, that's not how this place works. Bottom line: you've got no business lecturing anyone on respect. Have a very happy Yule. Sorry... Yoel.ShalomShlomo 22:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I've posted what I think could be a potential compromise (or the start of one) at the talk page for Satmar. Please take a look and let me know what you think. Please also accept my apologies for the confrontational tone above and at the various discussion pages. ShalomShlomo 07:35, 2 January 2006 (UTC)