Misplaced Pages

User talk:Decltype: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:01, 26 January 2010 editDYKadminBot (talk | contribs)25,702 edits Giving DYK credit for Grete Prytz Kittelsen on behalf of Ucucha← Previous edit Revision as of 10:32, 26 January 2010 edit undoHutch48 (talk | contribs)301 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 71: Line 71:
|On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and add it to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. |On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and add it to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
|} ] 06:01, 26 January 2010 (UTC) |} ] 06:01, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

==Comments related to the JWASM deletion page==
Thanks for the notification but it is hardly appropriate, differing from most who post here, poeple involved know who I am and the person who tagged the JWASM areticle has my name and email address on his talk page. From your posting on the JWASM deletion page it would seem that you have a good grasp of the considerations involved and have sufficient expertise within Misplaced Pages to access people with the appropriate x86 assembler experience to properly evaluate the reference material related to JWASM.

I spend the available time I have working on a couple of Misplaced Pages topics and it involves a considerable amount of work, downloading the source material to evaluate, checking the reference material, testing the software and reading the reference links on both the internet and the information available on Misplaced Pages thewn carefully constructing the article to properly reflect the topic in an unbiased manner. I find the willingness of a number of users to tag pages that they have not even read the discussion pages for a direct breach of Misplaced Pages policy and at odds with the end target of Misplaced Pages to provide an online encyclopaedia that is reliable in terms of its technical data.

I have further work to do on both the MASM page and the JWASM page but as long as these pages are under threat of deletion or as in the case of the MASM page when over half the page was deleted before another member reverted it, there is little reason to waste the effort upgrading the pages.

Regards,

] (]) 10:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:32, 26 January 2010

This administrator has volunteered for an administrator review. You may comment on his or her administrative actions at Misplaced Pages:Administrator review/Decltype.

Archiving icon
Archives


This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Re: Removal of warnings

Hello, Decltype. You have new messages at Jamesofur's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you!

Thanks for your help with article deletion issue. :) I appreciate your assistance and guidance.

Bernie

DYK for Ronen Har-Zvi

Updated DYK query On January 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ronen Har-Zvi, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Ah, that's great, thanks! decltype (talk) 12:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Danish speedy

Thanks for your help. Dr. Blofeld 13:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Glad to be of assistance. decltype (talk) 14:33, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

db-move

Thanks, I got a bit lost when trying to move it (Where I inappropriately used the db tag). - Misplaced Pages help stated there should be a move link on the page unless it was protected but I've just realised the link was missing because I was using the beta. Once I switched back to the standard wikipedia it was fine. Sorry for the trouble, cheers Clovis Sangrail (talk) 13:26, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Black Sharkminnow speedy decline

Fairy snuff. The chap has created around a dozen of these - I only tagged one as I wasn't sure whether it fell within the criteria. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:07, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

why is the statement inaccurate

why did you delete the information I added on importing/classifying namespaces —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomBrown16 (talkcontribs) 17:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

I assume you are referring to this. First of all, the article is about iostreams, and not namespaces, so the statement seems misplaced. When adding information to Misplaced Pages, even if you're a subject matter-expert, if the information could possibly be contested by anyone, you should add an inline citation to a source, so the accuracy and factuality of the information can be verified. using namespace std; is a using-directive, which frees you from having to qualify the names in the nominated namespace. The assertion that it is sometimes preferred to explicitly qualifying (not classifying) each name needs to be supported by a citation. But the main issue with the sentence is that it is misplaced. Hope that explains my reversion. Regards, decltype (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Okay, Having talked to you I understand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomBrown16 (talkcontribs) 20:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Okay, let me know if you have further questions or need help with anything. decltype (talk) 20:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Grete Prytz Kittelsen

Updated DYK query On January 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Grete Prytz Kittelsen, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 06:01, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments related to the JWASM deletion page

Thanks for the notification but it is hardly appropriate, differing from most who post here, poeple involved know who I am and the person who tagged the JWASM areticle has my name and email address on his talk page. From your posting on the JWASM deletion page it would seem that you have a good grasp of the considerations involved and have sufficient expertise within Misplaced Pages to access people with the appropriate x86 assembler experience to properly evaluate the reference material related to JWASM.

I spend the available time I have working on a couple of Misplaced Pages topics and it involves a considerable amount of work, downloading the source material to evaluate, checking the reference material, testing the software and reading the reference links on both the internet and the information available on Misplaced Pages thewn carefully constructing the article to properly reflect the topic in an unbiased manner. I find the willingness of a number of users to tag pages that they have not even read the discussion pages for a direct breach of Misplaced Pages policy and at odds with the end target of Misplaced Pages to provide an online encyclopaedia that is reliable in terms of its technical data.

I have further work to do on both the MASM page and the JWASM page but as long as these pages are under threat of deletion or as in the case of the MASM page when over half the page was deleted before another member reverted it, there is little reason to waste the effort upgrading the pages.

Regards,

Hutch48 (talk) 10:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Decltype: Difference between revisions Add topic