Revision as of 23:10, 26 January 2010 editJauerback (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators72,661 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Kid Rock. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:24, 27 January 2010 edit undoSugar Bear (talk | contribs)36,906 edits moving to correct placeNext edit → | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*RG, you are completely wrong about the POV-pushing, and it is ''you'' who is editing against consensus. There was already a consensus in place for alternative metal, and it is the best-sourced genre for that album. You can't just add every single genre ever sourced for any album because you dislike me and want to dick me around. You are extremely out of line and rude. There are warnings all over your talk page for edit-warring, genre-changing, and POV pushing. You clearly are not in a position to make accusatory statements of actions for which ''you'' are most definitely guilty of. (] (]) 18:35, 23 January 2010 (UTC)) | *RG, you are completely wrong about the POV-pushing, and it is ''you'' who is editing against consensus. There was already a consensus in place for alternative metal, and it is the best-sourced genre for that album. You can't just add every single genre ever sourced for any album because you dislike me and want to dick me around. You are extremely out of line and rude. There are warnings all over your talk page for edit-warring, genre-changing, and POV pushing. You clearly are not in a position to make accusatory statements of actions for which ''you'' are most definitely guilty of. (] (]) 18:35, 23 January 2010 (UTC)) | ||
::Dude I didn't want to do this and you have done some good work for the Muddy Waters albums, but please see . ] (]) 19:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC) | ::Dude I didn't want to do this and you have done some good work for the Muddy Waters albums, but please see . ] (]) 19:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
== January 2010 == | |||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:Kid Rock|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <b>]</b><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 23:10, 26 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:24, 27 January 2010
Archives |
No archives yet. |
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Your GA nomination of Basehead
The article Basehead you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Basehead for things which need to be addressed. Road Wizard (talk) 14:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding an image. There is just one final issue that I need an answer on before I can pass it for GA. Please respond on the review page. Regards. Road Wizard (talk) 18:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Roots
Please read Consensus can change. RG (talk) 18:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Okay these personal attacks and POV pushings are going to far. My edits have nothing to do with you, I had nothing against you until you kept on harassing me. You're a movie guy, remember Bambi. "If you ain't got nothing nice to say..." As well as you're comments against Blackmetalbaz and Wesley Dobbs are going to far. Roots has been sourced as a nu metal album by 1001 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die as well as a death metal album in The Encyclopedia of Heavy Metal. As well as a consensus in favor of these labels. RG (talk) 18:27, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- RG, you are completely wrong about the POV-pushing, and it is you who is editing against consensus. There was already a consensus in place for alternative metal, and it is the best-sourced genre for that album. You can't just add every single genre ever sourced for any album because you dislike me and want to dick me around. You are extremely out of line and rude. There are warnings all over your talk page for edit-warring, genre-changing, and POV pushing. You clearly are not in a position to make accusatory statements of actions for which you are most definitely guilty of. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 18:35, 23 January 2010 (UTC))
- Dude I didn't want to do this and you have done some good work for the Muddy Waters albums, but please see here. RG (talk) 19:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC)