| Revision as of 21:42, 2 February 2010 editWikiuserNI (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,043 edits General note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Butters' Bottom Bitch. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:23, 3 February 2010 edit undoPeter Isotalo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,553 edits →February 2010: removed; leaving "hello Mr Newbie"-type messages is not particularly polite behaviorNext edit → | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| :] <sup>]</sup> 02:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | :] <sup>]</sup> 02:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::Hey. Please remember to remove the nomination from ] since the GA review is complete. Thanks -- <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]]</span> 14:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC) | ::Hey. Please remember to remove the nomination from ] since the GA review is complete. Thanks -- <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]]</span> 14:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == February 2010 == | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article ], please cite a ] for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of ]. Take a look at ] for information about how to cite sources and the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ''Adding unsourced material, and then adding it again when it has been properly questioned and removed, is uncivil. Please discuss further on the talk page, simply leaving some time to pass and then adding it without cites does not suffice.'' ] (]) 21:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:23, 3 February 2010
 Archives | |
|
|
DYK for Anthony Roll
|
On January 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Anthony Roll, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Mary Rose
|
|
On January 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mary Rose, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 18:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK Mary Rose Trust Tweak needed to wording in hook or article
Hello! Your submission of Mary Rose Trust at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
I suspect you can just tone up what is said in the article. If you do change the hook, you're very close to the character limit. So be careful not to make it too long.
BTW, when I first lived in Portsmouth, my landlord was Alexander McKee's son. After I had moved out, I was invited round for a meal and Alexander showed slides taken when diving in the Red Sea.--Peter cohen (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I've approved Henrik's rewording. Good luck with dealing with the trust people. I think it must be approximately 20 years since I last had contact with Alex jnr, so I can't help through him. (I've just noticed I linked the wrong Alexander McKee. I've now added a dab link to make our one easier to find.)--Peter cohen (talk) 22:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Mary Rose Trust
|
|
On January 13, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mary Rose Trust, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Wikiproject: Did you know? 12:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Mary Rose peer review
Hello Peter, I noticed your messages at WT:SHIPS and WT:MARITIME about the newly-opened peer review. In the future I suggest that instead of opening a general peer review (where general editor response can be lacking), open a peer review at the Military history WikiProject. Our review process is in no small part the reason for our success and continued throughput of high-quality content month after month. It has been my observation that MILHIST requests are usually responded to much quicker as well with a better quality of review since those reviewing usually have some knowledge of the subject which is beneficial. You do not need to worry about this one because I have enabled cross-listing of this review within the MILHIST framework (we maintain this capability for instances exactly such as this). Thanks, -MBK004 02:51, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion and helping out with cross-linking. Making the Mary Rose PR into a general history topic was quite intentional, though. I know that MILHIST is an extremely efficient project, and I have a lot of respect for your work. However, since the Mary Rose is about so much more than just military history, particularly maritime archaeology, I didn't want it to be classified as a purely "military" review. MILHIST's input on the military aspects on the Mary Rose, however, will be most welcome.
- I'll keep what you said in mind for some future projects I'm doing research for right now.
- Peter 09:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Anthony roll PR
Glad to help - I also made two more comments on the PR and if I get a chance will try rereading the article to see if anything else jumps out at me. I wonder if it would be possible to make an electronic recreration of the vellum rolls? Stitch together the images from Pepys' book... Just an idea. Thanks again for an interesting and enjoyable read, Ruhrfisch ><>° 22:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Korean cuisine GAC
Hi, Peter, I'm sorry to tell you that I can not make the article of Korea cuisine within the promised time. I'm currently busy and stressed out for RL matters, so the major commitment to make the article up to GA status is too much burden for me at this point. I'm only adding something to unsourced BLP from being deleted or minor edits. If I implement the article later and fix all problems that you raised, I will ask for your review. Thank you for your time and patience as well as your all efforts made for the GAC review. --Caspian blue 01:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. The improvements you made still raised the quality of the article. I'd be glad to look at it again if you so wish. You know my main concerns, so next time around shouldn't be too difficult.
- Peter 02:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hey. Please remember to remove the nomination from WP:GAC since the GA review is complete. Thanks -- warrior4321 14:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)