| Revision as of 10:06, 9 February 2010 editCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Michael Friedrich: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:11, 10 February 2010 edit undoTbsdy lives (talk | contribs)7,977 edits →Not baiting: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| Hello, Jehochman. I'm not sure whether you're active or not, but if you are, could you look into {{User|Je suis tres fatigue}} and ]? You once dealt with the sockpuppeter {{User|Michael Friedrich}}, so I think your input would be greatly appreciated to prevent the likely block-evading sockpuppeter's disruptive behavior. Thanks.--] 10:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | Hello, Jehochman. I'm not sure whether you're active or not, but if you are, could you look into {{User|Je suis tres fatigue}} and ]? You once dealt with the sockpuppeter {{User|Michael Friedrich}}, so I think your input would be greatly appreciated to prevent the likely block-evading sockpuppeter's disruptive behavior. Thanks.--] 10:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Not baiting == | |||
| I'm actually pretty offended you say that I'm baiting him. I stumbled onto that page I added to MFD entirely by accident, and I was shocked to see what I still maintain is an attack page. | |||
| You can think that I'm baiting him if you want, I guess there's not much I can do about that. I maintain that he's a nasty piece of work, and a corrosive influence on Misplaced Pages. I'm sorry if that's considered a personal attack, but it's just true. Yes, his work on architecture is amazing, but the amount of heartache and drama he's caused is incredible. I'm amazed he hasn't been permanently banned. | |||
| Anyhow, I'm off to a corner of Misplaced Pages where he won't show up. I was trying to stay right away from him from day one, but unfortunately another admin made personal comments and set him off on the incivility policy proposal that was put forward. He then proceeded to take over the whole discussion, even though there were 4 or 5 other editors who were getting annoyed as they couldn't follow what was going on. As he's seen fit to camp there, and nothing can be done about it and noone is willing to try, I'm not going to try to mediate on a bloke who could hates civility and gets away with calling other editors "priggish hypocrites". It's just not worth it! - ] (formerly ]) <sup>]</sup> 15:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:11, 10 February 2010
 | Welcome to Jehochman's Talk Page Please feel free to put your feet on the coffee table, and speak candidly. Or for more better relaxation, stretch yourself luxuriously on the chaise longue in Bishzilla's Victorian parlour and mumble incoherently. |
User talk:Jehochman/Archive index
 | Jehochman is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon. |
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Michael Friedrich
Hello, Jehochman. I'm not sure whether you're active or not, but if you are, could you look into Je suis tres fatigue (talk · contribs) and Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Michael Friedrich? You once dealt with the sockpuppeter Michael Friedrich (talk · contribs), so I think your input would be greatly appreciated to prevent the likely block-evading sockpuppeter's disruptive behavior. Thanks.--Caspian blue 10:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Not baiting
I'm actually pretty offended you say that I'm baiting him. I stumbled onto that page I added to MFD entirely by accident, and I was shocked to see what I still maintain is an attack page.
You can think that I'm baiting him if you want, I guess there's not much I can do about that. I maintain that he's a nasty piece of work, and a corrosive influence on Misplaced Pages. I'm sorry if that's considered a personal attack, but it's just true. Yes, his work on architecture is amazing, but the amount of heartache and drama he's caused is incredible. I'm amazed he hasn't been permanently banned.
Anyhow, I'm off to a corner of Misplaced Pages where he won't show up. I was trying to stay right away from him from day one, but unfortunately another admin made personal comments and set him off on the incivility policy proposal that was put forward. He then proceeded to take over the whole discussion, even though there were 4 or 5 other editors who were getting annoyed as they couldn't follow what was going on. As he's seen fit to camp there, and nothing can be done about it and noone is willing to try, I'm not going to try to mediate on a bloke who could hates civility and gets away with calling other editors "priggish hypocrites". It's just not worth it! - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) 15:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)