Revision as of 10:57, 19 March 2010 view sourceHeavydata (talk | contribs)619 edits →The Colons← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:00, 19 March 2010 view source Ryulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits →The ColonsNext edit → | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
:::So because there is no manual of style that dictates this for Power Rangers articles, you're still going to disrupt Misplaced Pages to appease the RangerBoard masses?—<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font> (<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>) 10:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | :::So because there is no manual of style that dictates this for Power Rangers articles, you're still going to disrupt Misplaced Pages to appease the RangerBoard masses?—<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font> (<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>) 10:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::No, I'm requesting a move to the CORRECT titles. It has nothing to do with what Rangerboard believes. It's what provided on the official sites, and that alone. If the official sites had colons and Rangerboard said there were no colons? Guess what I'd do, nothing because then the colons would be the correct titles! Do you have AIM or MSN or something so we can discuss this further? ] (]) 10:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | ::::No, I'm requesting a move to the CORRECT titles. It has nothing to do with what Rangerboard believes. It's what provided on the official sites, and that alone. If the official sites had colons and Rangerboard said there were no colons? Guess what I'd do, nothing because then the colons would be the correct titles! Do you have AIM or MSN or something so we can discuss this further? ] (]) 10:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::And how would you have found out about this issue? Rangerboard. They are the only place that actually rages that Misplaced Pages uses colons because it's grammatically correct and not just because of the laziness of the Bandai and Disney webmasters.—<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font> (<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>) 11:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:00, 19 March 2010
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page by using either the "new section" tab or this link. |
Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). If you do not sign your comments, I may remove them entirely. |
Please keep your comments short and to the point. I do not want to read essays on this page. |
I will revert and ignore any basic template messages used on my talk page. If you want to talk to me, use your own words. |
I prefer to keep conversations on one page. If I left a message for you on your user talk page, I prefer to respond to you there. |
My local time: January 2025 17 Friday 4:14 pm EST |
Archives
|
---|
|
When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng
Ultraman Zero 2010
There will be a new ultra series for Ultraman Zero and there will be an dark version of him self called, Techtor Gear Black (テクターギアブラック, Tecutā Gia Burakku). Ultraman Zero vs. Techtor Gear Black. AlienX2009 (talk) 18:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Doesn't mean anything yet.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes it does. Zero will have a series during summer according to the scans. AlienX2010 (talk) 19:54, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- No they do not say that.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:52, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- According to TV-Magazine, Zero will have a series. AlienX2010 (talk) 01:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- When more information comes out we'll do something about it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Sure. AlienX2010 (talk) 01:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- When more information comes out we'll do something about it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- According to TV-Magazine, Zero will have a series. AlienX2010 (talk) 01:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- No they do not say that.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:52, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes it does. Zero will have a series during summer according to the scans. AlienX2010 (talk) 19:54, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
User:btphelps
Hi. Do you know about this? I have been working with this editor (btphelps (talk · contribs)) for the last couple of weeks on the Holt Manufacturing Company and related articles, and find it very surprising that he should be blocked. -- EdJogg (talk) 20:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know what IP it is. I don't remember when the block occurred, and I certainly can't do any unblocking can I?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- It's OK. I was taking the notice at face value, and it mentioned your user name. Someone else has unblocked him, so all's well now. Sorry for bothering you! -- EdJogg (talk) 00:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk page
If I add information to a talk page, will it be reviewed for possible additions/changes to the main page? 76.22.36.95 (talk) 18:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- It will be discussed and determined whether or not other editors think it is a good idea.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Proposed new Power Rangers character infobox
I noticed that you have removed Tommy's image from the WP:TOKU talk page, however, I would like your opinion on my proposed new Power Rangers character infobox. I have removed the colored title bar, replacing it with a color section where we use {{color box}}es to list all colors, that way we can represent all of a Ranger's colors equally. After all, there have been many edit wars on what color should be used to represent a particular Ranger, particularly Tommy Oliver, Adam Park, and T.J. Johnson. Do you support my idea? ANDROS 02:55, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Just do it and fix it across the articles.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:01, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
wqa
The off wiki accusation is irrelevant -- however, accusing another editor of stalking on-wiki is not. Suggest you strike the comment and forget about the WQA. Gerardw (talk) 02:34, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- You're right about it not being stalking. He just happens to have an account on both sites and is using it to his advantage.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:35, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Threat left on your page
It's being dealt with here . Ridernyc (talk) 00:11, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
My talk page
My talk page is apparently protected, and "can be edited or moved only by administrators." As I've since been unblocked, is it possible to unprotect this page and perhaps archive the vandalism mayhem or something similar? Thanks. --S-man (talk) 01:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I cannot perform any such unprotections anymore. Please go to WP:RFPP. Also, are you telling me you've been unblocked for two years but you have not bothered to request for your talk page to be unprotected until right now?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:33, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will take it there. I have been unblocked for two years, but only recently returned to Misplaced Pages, and have really have not paid much attention to my talk page. --S-man (talk) 01:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Exotick
where is your sourece? AlienX2010 (talk) 23:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Terebikun, April 2010, Page 31.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Telephone
Sorry i dont know how long you been on wikipedia but simply reverting edits when a discussion is open is not an acceptable form of editing. You can see from my edit and from the talk page that the issue is being discussed. Therefore editing the page in the way which you did is likely to inflame the situation. In future please engage in the discussion and wait until resolved before implementing change. I suggest you add your opinion to the page/responses. Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Four years. And read WP:BRD.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
The Colons
They're without colons on the official sites, so they should also be without colons on Misplaced Pages. I'm thinking of making a move request for Star Wars now too, thanks. I only got 53 out of the 54 articles sadly. Heavydata (talk) 10:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Both are extremely useless, extremely unfeasible, and asinine. There are probably hundreds of Star Wars pages. RangerBoard isn't right about everything.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't understand why you're so worried. If the move is approved you won't have to do any of the work, someone else will. Also, I just found this , so I won't bother asking for a move because it seems they are all have a clear consensus. Heavydata (talk) 10:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- So because there is no manual of style that dictates this for Power Rangers articles, you're still going to disrupt Misplaced Pages to appease the RangerBoard masses?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- No, I'm requesting a move to the CORRECT titles. It has nothing to do with what Rangerboard believes. It's what provided on the official sites, and that alone. If the official sites had colons and Rangerboard said there were no colons? Guess what I'd do, nothing because then the colons would be the correct titles! Do you have AIM or MSN or something so we can discuss this further? Heavydata (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- And how would you have found out about this issue? Rangerboard. They are the only place that actually rages that Misplaced Pages uses colons because it's grammatically correct and not just because of the laziness of the Bandai and Disney webmasters.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 11:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- No, I'm requesting a move to the CORRECT titles. It has nothing to do with what Rangerboard believes. It's what provided on the official sites, and that alone. If the official sites had colons and Rangerboard said there were no colons? Guess what I'd do, nothing because then the colons would be the correct titles! Do you have AIM or MSN or something so we can discuss this further? Heavydata (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- So because there is no manual of style that dictates this for Power Rangers articles, you're still going to disrupt Misplaced Pages to appease the RangerBoard masses?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't understand why you're so worried. If the move is approved you won't have to do any of the work, someone else will. Also, I just found this , so I won't bother asking for a move because it seems they are all have a clear consensus. Heavydata (talk) 10:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)