| Revision as of 18:30, 26 April 2010 view sourceJacurek (talk | contribs)9,609 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:14, 28 April 2010 view source Jacurek (talk | contribs)9,609 edits ←Blanked the pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ArbCom case amendment request == | |||
| == He does it again == | |||
| Help me with , because I am afraid I won't be able to hold myself from WP:PA.--] (]) 07:38, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| For continued battleground conduct in the domain you are topic-banned from, including personal attack, you are blocked for another 3 months. Next time you are found to edit disruptively, be it inside the Arbcom-imposed period of topic ban or afterwards, will mean an indefinite block. ] ] 09:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ...and I'm sure that you will be the one to make the judgment and you will execute the block if any, '''am I right?''' :) Remember this E-mail FP? You have sent to me accidently??? | |||
| You still doing it.--] (]) 02:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Are you going to also block Matthead for this ] personal attack on Polish editor?--] (]) 02:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| What about this ] pathetic personal attack by Dan? | |||
| Watch the end of the video he attacked Loosmark with. | |||
| Are you going to block Matthead and Dan dear FP :)?--] (]) 04:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| To FP. | |||
| Are you going to respond to my questions? When will you stop blocking Polish editors '''ONLY''' ignoring nasty behaviour of people like Matthead, Dan etc.? (see links above) You are '''completely biased, unfair''' and you should '''not''' be an administrator. | |||
| The issue of your biased actions should be soon addressed at the appropriate forum, just to let you know.--] (]) 22:27, 17 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| ]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]"). | |||
| Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
| You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. | |||
| '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Jan Dzierzon== | |||
| Imie i nazwisko Dzierzona zostalo zmieniona na Johann Dzierzon, to jest pisownia niemiecka. Britanica podaje Jan Dzierżoń (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/175400/Jan-Dzierzon) i tak powinno byc. Rowniez tu (http://bees.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=bees;idno=5017629) angielskie tlumaczenie pracy Dzierzona podaje Dzierżon, Jan. Czy skontaktowales sie z museum w Kluczborku, albo przeczytales dowody i fotokopie w podanych pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka? Pomijanie zrodel polskich jest niedopuszczalne. Ci ktorzy chca zmieniac artykul powinni uznac wage zrodel polskich wage a nie lawirowac na drugorzednych przekladach i niepelnych zrodlach. Podane tez sa wspolczesne artykuly w prasie polskiej i napisane przez Polakow. Trzeba je wniesc do tekstu. Niech chociaz bedzie widoczne ze spoleczenstwo polskie ma silne zdanie na ten temat. Podaje Ci e-mail jezeli chcesz powaznie pracowac bez udzialu szpiegow: erudra@hotmail.com. --Soujdspo (talk) 22:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
| Bierz zawsze pod uwage ze: 1) w okresie Bismarck'a zniemczano imiona celowo 2) Poszukiwania liczbowe zapisu imion na internecie sa falszywka - autorzy wtedy i dzisiaj powtarzaja to co zostalo zniemczone i wprowadzone w pismie, clowo, przez nieuwage lub niewiedze. Jedyna droga czy jego imie powinno byc pisane Jahann czy Jan jest stwierdzenie ze Dzierzon uwazal sie za Polaka i kultywowal polskos, i tak jest zgodnie z dokumentami opisanymi w pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka etc. --Soujdspo (talk) 02:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| --] (]) 02:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, Jacurek. Because you participated in ], you may be interested in ]. ] (]) 02:26, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Your e-mail == | |||
| Please contact me on-wiki if you would like to discuss issues related to my administrative work on Misplaced Pages. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm a blocked now partly because Varsovian drove me insane for months. I noticed that Varsovian has been just warned http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Varsovian#Arbitration_enforcement_warning:_discretionary_sanctions_.28WP:DIGWUREN.29 | |||
| but Varsovian has been already warned TWICE | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Varsovian#Arbcom_sanctions_warning | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:London_Victory_Parade_of_1946&diff=354939337&oldid=354919410g | |||
| why another warning?????--] (]) 18:29, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | |||