Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sexual addiction: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:42, 6 September 2010 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,313 editsm Signing comment by 86.210.13.245 - "No critical section ?: new section"← Previous edit Revision as of 00:11, 11 September 2010 edit undoJames Cantor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,721 edits Disclosure.: new sectionNext edit →
Line 43: Line 43:
Seriously...<br/> Seriously...<br/>
The only pathology, in my opinion, is that some people want to believe they are sick. And some people are more than willing to make them think they are. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> The only pathology, in my opinion, is that some people want to believe they are sick. And some people are more than willing to make them think they are. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Disclosure. ==

I have added to the mainpage an EL to an interview regarding sex addiction. Because I am the subject of that interview, I am indicating it here, so that other editors may decide whether the EL informative appropriate to the page content.<br>
] (]) 00:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:11, 11 September 2010

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sexual addiction article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPsychology Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge Sexual addiction with Pornography addiction?

See discussion

Cleanup

I tagged this article for cleanup on 22 Jan 2007 due to phrases such as:

So to be clear, sexual addiction is addiction of a sexual nature. In which the sexual method of arousal, stimulation, etc. becomes a compulsion with withdrawal syndromes if it is taken away for too long a period of time.

These sentences, and several others in the article, are clearly grammatically incorrect and non-encyclopedic.

Link deletion

I've deleted the two BS links because they had nothing to add of encyclopedic value; save from some interesting view into the life of people who try to enforce a sex-less world.

United States only?

I have a strong hunch that this is an United States only phenomenon. (Defining someone as a "sexual addict.") A some sort of international aspect would be interesting. Does anyone know any studies or statistics? Thanks! -- 88.194.188.158 (talk) 20:52, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Citation Needed 11

I have deleted the following sentence in the main intro para

Skeptics believe that it is a myth that the phenomenon exists as a disease or disorder at all and is instead a by-product of cultural and other influences.{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}}
Thanks!

Arman Cagle 18:16, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

No critical section ?

Am I the only to believe that this so-called phenomenon is nothing but a way for the therapists to line their pockets ?
Seriously...
The only pathology, in my opinion, is that some people want to believe they are sick. And some people are more than willing to make them think they are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.210.13.245 (talk) 17:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Disclosure.

I have added to the mainpage an EL to an interview regarding sex addiction. Because I am the subject of that interview, I am indicating it here, so that other editors may decide whether the EL informative appropriate to the page content.
— James Cantor (talk) 00:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Sexual addiction: Difference between revisions Add topic