| Revision as of 02:03, 18 September 2010 editWm5200 (talk | contribs)405 edits →Please help← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:10, 18 September 2010 edit undo71.178.55.113 (talk) →Please help: You are a random targetNext edit → | ||
| Line 634: | Line 634: | ||
| Why did Andonic delete me on Death of Hitler? Gwen? Thank you!] (]) 01:57, 18 September 2010 (UTC) | Why did Andonic delete me on Death of Hitler? Gwen? Thank you!] (]) 01:57, 18 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Question == | |||
| How do you prevent an anti-vandal enthusiast from becoming complacent? | |||
| You call him "Scruffy" 100,000 times. Look for a major re-editing of your talk page to include the word 100,000 times. n. I plan to do it at noon eastern time tomorrow. Scruffy. By the way, I am going to attack all of the pages I attach this message to at that same time. ] (]) 08:10, 18 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:10, 18 September 2010
Welcome!
Hello, Active Banana, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Laurinavicius (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 Archives | ||||
|
||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Cookies
Gromoror has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Hi to you too!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
For future reference
Dostro
Hello.
Are you from Misplaced Pages or a Filipino fan? I am a fan of music and I adhere to Wiki's mission to provide accurate information. You have been deleting my contributions to The Pin-Ups. they are a legit band with a legit background. You are either nitpicking or a Filipino with a bad case of crab mentality. Worse, if you're not Filipino then you are dangerously close to being labelled a racist. Why can't a Filipino band be on Misplaced Pages? FYI, there are other Filipino bands on this site--why aren't you picking on them too? I just need to understand.
Putting up information regarding The Pin-Ups is not quantified as being biased nor is it being a "fanatic". Please do your research regarding this band's legitimacy before you censor others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dostro (talk • contribs) 15:57, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
martin bormann
hullo why did you remove my martin bormann in popular culture ref
Sankurathri Foundation in need of monitoring and clean up
To do
Policy Regarding Unsourced Material
"If a claim is doubtful but not harmful, use the tag, which will add "citation needed," but remember to go back and remove the claim if no source is produced within a reasonable time." Please add the fact tag in the future, instead of simply undoing the changes that have been made.
You can choose to do otherwise, but the policy does suggest that you add fact tags for information that is not harmful. You're free to believe what you want, but it's hard for me to believe that being listed as an associated act is harmful to the article when the article already references that association.
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Theleftorium 19:00, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
active banana please clean up the Ziana Zain article and profile they're putting some sources but they're liable and not about ziana,. thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.193.39.206 (talk) 02:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
PRODding
Hi, remember that "Notification of the article's author(s) is strongly recommended. " - I see you didn't notify the creator of Zafar Nozim. PamD (talk) 14:10, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
- I think you would have found sources if you'd looked harder (e.g. searching using his name in Tajik), but the BLP PROD is moot now as he died a couple of days after you prodded it. Is BLP PROD a form of voodoo? Fences&Windows 17:58, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Fried chicken flu
Whatever about the sources, my problem with what you did with that page is that you also erased the whole page NOT JUST THE SOURCES THAT YOU COMPLAINED ABOUT. So if you are going to use the rollback feature USE IT IN THE RIGHT TIME AND PLACE.Inka 888 (talk) 23:19, 20 August 2010 (UTC) When there is no third party sourced content, we do not have a stand alone article about the topic. And I did not use any roll back feature. Active Banana (talk) 21:41, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Eli Soriano
You said "Content presented in articles, particularly content about living people MUST be presented in WP:NPOV format NOT tabloid gossip interpretations.. Active Banana (talk) 15:26, 4 August 2010 (UTC)"''. Well then if that's the case why not reformat the sourced content instead of outright deleting it and getting into an edit war? Conrad940 (talk) 15:31, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
You said Any content that beings with "apparently" is completely inappropriate WP:OR. Active Banana (talk) 15:31, 4 August 2010 (UTC) If you're only opposed to the word apparently, then taking it out would remove your objection to the content, correct? Conrad940 (talk) 15:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- You said The fact that YOU used the word "apparently" signals to me that the sources do not explictly support the claims. Pre judging my intent because I used of certain words? Did you read the source? If you did, how would you form your content that would convey the same message as the content I contributed? Conrad940 (talk) 15:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
You said Because the source you used is not in a language that I read and so I cannot place appropriate content into the article. But I CAN tell that what you inserted is NOT appropriate. Active Banana (talk) 15:37, 4 August 2010 (UTC) Well then based on the source cited, how would you form the content that WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO YOU? Conrad940 (talk) 15:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- You said Based on the article, yes I am prejudging that anything that vaguely appears POV push, is very likely a POV push and needs to be stopped immediately. Active Banana (talk) 15:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC). Good. So then, something short of plagiarizing a source is not POV, correct? Conrad940 (talk) 15:59, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Request
Could you comment on whether i've quoted you correctly, and captured the context of your comment, at the bottom of this thread? --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 15:57, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
just a note
I think you showed a lot of class here. I agree that it was humane under the circumstances to let the "moron" remark pass. It also raises the question of what we're willing to do as a "community" when other editors lapse into unhelpful language for emotional or psychological reasons we aren't in a position to assess. It's a problem of WP:IRL — the product is real, the editors are real, but the "community" is virtual and lacks many of the flesh-and-blood cues we need in order to know how to treat each other. Therefore, I appreciated your quick willingness to respect another editor's humanity. Cynwolfe (talk) 19:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Show just cause
Please show me the areas of the article that require additional sources. And I'm not talking about random points. I need to see points that could potentially undermine the article. And could "citation needed" templates be added to the individual sentence instead. The article has about 5 paragraphs. How many more sources does it need? It's so easy to slap unnecessary and unattractive templates on the pages, instead of taking 5 minutes out of your time and updating the page yourself. Orane (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Initial response: WP:V applies to ALL content not just what "could potentially undermine the article".
- And if you want to dictate to me how I spend my Misplaced Pages time, then you can hire me, until that time, you're not the boss of me. "Misplaced Pages is a volunteer community, and does not require its users to give any more time and effort than they wish. Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather than demanding more from other users."Active Banana (talk) 23:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- First off, I'd never want to hire you. Secondly, follow your own advice and improve articles (tagging them is not improving them). And thirdly, your work here has nothing to do with me, except when you blindly revert my edits, and can't even back it up with a proper explanation. Have a nice day. Orane (talk) 04:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Tagging certainly is a step towards improving the project. It lets those who have access to sources know where they can go to make improvements and more importantly it makes readers aware that 1) they should be aware that the content in an article is only as good as the sources and 2) that we are aware of the limitations of the tagged articles and are not trying to foist off second rate goods as prime content. Active Banana (talk) 04:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- To be honest, and this may sound cynical, no one thinks of Misplaced Pages articles as "prime content". But I digress. WP:Verifiability states "in practice not everything need actually be attributed. This policy requires that anything challenged or likely to be challenged." I've gone through the article a number of times and nothing is likely to be challenged, and nothing could potentially undermine the article or violate BLP. Yes, tags are important, but definitely not when they are overused and unnecessary, like it was, in this particular article. And it's like I have to fight to keep unnecessary tags out. One user thinks that a point needs sourcing, and suddenly, the entire article is tagged. The articles look so extremely shabby and tasteless. Orane (talk) 04:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- "To be honest, and this may sound cynical, no one thinks of Misplaced Pages articles as "prime content"." I think you are very much wrong, otherwise Misplaced Pages would not be one of the first 5 hits for any topic that you search for. Active Banana (talk) 04:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- To be honest, and this may sound cynical, no one thinks of Misplaced Pages articles as "prime content". But I digress. WP:Verifiability states "in practice not everything need actually be attributed. This policy requires that anything challenged or likely to be challenged." I've gone through the article a number of times and nothing is likely to be challenged, and nothing could potentially undermine the article or violate BLP. Yes, tags are important, but definitely not when they are overused and unnecessary, like it was, in this particular article. And it's like I have to fight to keep unnecessary tags out. One user thinks that a point needs sourcing, and suddenly, the entire article is tagged. The articles look so extremely shabby and tasteless. Orane (talk) 04:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Tagging certainly is a step towards improving the project. It lets those who have access to sources know where they can go to make improvements and more importantly it makes readers aware that 1) they should be aware that the content in an article is only as good as the sources and 2) that we are aware of the limitations of the tagged articles and are not trying to foist off second rate goods as prime content. Active Banana (talk) 04:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- First off, I'd never want to hire you. Secondly, follow your own advice and improve articles (tagging them is not improving them). And thirdly, your work here has nothing to do with me, except when you blindly revert my edits, and can't even back it up with a proper explanation. Have a nice day. Orane (talk) 04:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- No matter how annoying it may be, when someone puts a tag on a particular sentence or section, then the content per definition has been challenged. Now you may argue that some of that content is evident in references used elsewhere in the article, and thus remove the tag as been superfluous... But if the tagger persists, then you have to put a reference to the text - and all that would take, in such a case, is to make a named reference and reuse a reference already in the article. I do agree that articles can end up being overtagged or over-referenced - but this is the way that WP works. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 16:03, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
I think I'm very much right for the simple fact that high schools and universities all warn against using Misplaced Pages for a myriad of reasons, ranging from the fact that articles aren't written by professionals, to the fact that they are unstable and may be changed by anyone at anytime. Misplaced Pages is popular because it's popular (circular, but true), not because it's "good". Orane (talk) 04:59, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Of course they warn against using WP. I'd warn against it as well - but not because WP is bad, or wrong.... WP should always be seen as a beginning step in any sort of fact-gathering/research, which is also the reason why references are so damned important. You should always be critical of sources. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 16:06, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
RE: Adalberto Román
Hi Active Banana (one of the best names I've come across in Misplaced Pages, by the way). Olé is a horrible source, its a tabloid sports newspaper with a reputation of incompetence when it comes to fact checking and accuracy. But it is useful for verifying basic information (Adalberto Román moved from Libertad to River Plate). In the same reference it says that the transfer was made for a 3 million US dollars fee, while the other reference provided (Diario ABC Color) says it was closed for 3,6 million. Those cases are when Olé can't be trusted and a different source is required.
Regarding notability, I understand that the subject passess the Athlete guidelines, having played more than 80 games on a fully professional league. Therefore, I'll remove the tag if you concur (is that a word?) with my opinion. Regards. Fache (talk) 04:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Cassandra Clare
Hello, there is currently a content dispute at this article and I'd like to see if an agreement can be reached. Since you are a recent contributor to the article, I'd like to ask if you wish to give your opinion on the matter. I'm not involved in the article myself, I'm only interested in trying to bring everyone to a discussion. If you're interested, please comment at this thread, thank you. -- Atama頭 06:13, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Inception_(film) & reliable sources
Sorry about that, it looked like page blanking to me originally but I see it clearly wasn't. I revently started helping with vandalism, I'll take more care in the future. I've reverted my edit. BioStu (talk) 15:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Dock jumping - thanks
Thanks for your input at Dock jumping. I'm slowly trying to improve what was originally a very poor article. You were 100% correct to tag the article and remove the external links. I'm going to work to find third party sources which are not directly from one of the organisations that run dock jumping competitions. Any further contributions would be very welcome. --Simple Bob (talk) 18:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
I have added a few references which are an improvement on the previous ones which were nearly all from the jumping organisations such as Dock Dogs, Ultimate Air Dogs, etc. I do consider the United Kennel Club to be a reliable source though, what do you think about that particular one? Otherwise most of the references that I have added are from news sources - using only recognised organisations and staying away from blogs etc. I'm going to leave your tag on the article though, I'll leave it to you or someone else to determine whether or not it is appropriately referenced. --Simple Bob (talk) 21:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
b.t.w. if you are US-based you might want to watch the Letterman show tonight as it has a big feature on dock jumping. --Simple Bob (talk) 21:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Christian Marrero
I don't know if you already knew this; if you did, please ignore me. However, when you BLPPROD an article and someone else removes it without providing at least one source, as happened here, you can reinsert the tag, if you wish. Cheers. Salvio 23:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Jaume Sisa
I see you are developing quite a catalog of controversial edits. I removed your speedy delete tag from this page which was already tagged for PROD. I also reverted your removal of the external links which appear to be good sources to me. And a long discography is a pretty clear claim of notability. Rmhermen (talk) 19:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Mohammed Rafi
Dear Mr. Banana, You deleted the section I had edited under Mohammed Rafi called Legacy citing reason as Source. I had provided links to all those singers who were inspired by him. If you check the specific pages of those singers, it is mentioned in them that they were inspired by Mohammed Rafi. My Edit was (Many successfull Indian playback singers were inspired by Mohammed Rafi and adopted his style of singing. While Mahendra Kapoor was his contemporary and yet swore allegiance to his voice, Anwar, Shabbir Kumar, Mohammed Aziz and Sonu Nigam continued the legacy after his death.) Kindly check the links and you will find the Source in the relevent pages of the other singers that I have mentioned. Thanks Much!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.184.48.2 (talk) 00:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Siobhan Magnus
May I ask what about the previous edit was irrelevant? You removed the names of her parents as well as a paragraph on her high school drama club experience. Even Lady Gaga's article has information on high school musical performances and roles. Please clarify this, as there are quite some people wondering why you reverted the edit.
Bulletinspace (talk) 17:33, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- So you're saying it's relevant Lady Gaga was in her high school's drama club and it's not relevant that Siobhan Magnus was. Okay, the meaning of the name is irrelevant, granted. And what better sources for her parents' and siblings' names do you suggest, if not a local newspaper (Cape Cod Times) that has interviewed both her parents? Don't get me wrong, I just want to know what we need to do in order to expand this article and make it better, when there are barely any other sources than local/regional newspapers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bulletinspace (talk • contribs) 18:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Personally, I think a musician's background (including vocal and instrumental training) is important, but maybe that's just me. What about her parents' and siblings' names? Also irrelevant? Bulletinspace (talk) 18:27, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
-- And the Cape Cod Times isn't reliable enough? I would think they know the names of the people they interviewed. Might seem rude if they'd been calling them the wrong names all along. Bulletinspace (talk) 19:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
User:Furey x/National Airsoft Organisations
Hi Active Banana, just letting you know that proposed deletions are only valid for articles and disambiguation pages, user pages and sub pages aren't eligible. They can be deleted through speedy deletion if they meet one of the criteria listed there, otherwise they should be brought to Miscellany for Deletion. Thanks! -- Atama頭 19:25, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ahh, I had PROD before the creator moved it back to user space. Active Banana (talk) 19:33, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, that makes sense. Never mind then. The creator should have removed the tag themselves in that case. -- Atama頭 17:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Troy Davis case
It's not my personal point of view; it's the POV of the jury that convicted him and sentenced him to death.24.78.6.42 (talk) 15:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
RE:Kwon Yuri
I agree, the "Girls' Generation" section should contain something but the sentence "Kwon was a member of the group Girl's Generation." is totally redundant, since this is already said in the second sentence of the article. And it's partly wrong since Yuri still is Girls' Generation member... Somebody should add something more detailed... --Dr. Crisp (talk) 18:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Re: Andrew Breitbart
Greetings Active Banana. It appears that you have undone an addition I submitted to the "Controversies" section of the Andrew Breitbart page. Could you please provide your reasoning? The data I entered is all sourced and referenced from other Wiki pages, is verifiably accurate, and in no way is biased or vandalous. I think the information I provided is salient and useful, and if there is some administrative issue with my submission I would like to address it so the content is available. Please advise. thanks. Trappem (talk) 17:28, 12 August 2010 (UTC)trappem "Misplaced Pages pages are not reliable sources". An interesting notion. It is common for one Wiki page to link to others as I have done. I was in the process of adding external sources when I found my text had vanished. Would the submission be acceptable with additional external references? I'm happy to do this but the page needs to remain intact for more than 90 seconds. thanks, Trappem (talk) 17:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)trappem Hi Banana, I've re-submitted with external cites. If there are still shortcomings could you please let me know (before zapping the entire thing) and I will address them asap. thanks, Trappem (talk) 18:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)trappem
Kristof Goddaert
Hi, I see that you have added an {{notability}} and an {{refimproveblp}} template. This rider is a full-professional, and meets the notability standard for cyclists.
The article is referenced by his team's homepage and . MichaelJackson231 (talk) 10:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
ERROR: Please enter the username parameter when using the {{Talkback}} template - thus {{Talkback|<username>}}. MichaelJackson231 (talk) 09:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Reddy
I observed that this chaotic article has lot of fights related to whether Reddy is a social group or a honorary title.Reddy denotes a social grouping of many castes and is also used by communities like Kammas,Yadavas,Agnikula Kshatriyas and Vokkaligas as a title to denote a Village Headman.I presently have requested a move to Reddy(Social Group) to avoid further fights.Give your view on the talk page.-Raghavan(Talk) 12:22, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Kwon Yuri
"Misplaced Pages is not a fanpage. We refer to people by their family name, not their first name or vanity name. Your edit to Kwon Yuri has been reverted."
This explains why first names are used on the pages of every other Korean idol I have seen?
- No, but it explains why it shouldn't be so. Feel free to apply this rule to those other articles. (Just stalking by.) Drmies (talk) 03:08, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- No. Active Banana is right! Refer to WP:Common Names first. Farjad0322 (talk) 04:13, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Also, there is another article, Yuri (Korean singer). Farjad0322 (talk) 04:14, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Jason Leopold
Hello, the situation at this article has gone on long enough (over 2 years). I'm working on a draft RfC and wonder whether you would be willing to contribute, either as an involved party who tried to help the user, or as an outside view, since your involvement appears to be fairly minimal. Take a look and let me know. I think this could all be gotten under control if the user is restricted to making suggestions on the article talk page, though given the attitude of the user it may well have to end in a ban. Of course, that's a different venue... Yworo (talk) 15:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Nicole Polizzi
If you feel that there should not be a page on Nicole Polizzi, please do not blank the page and create a redirect. You can discuss it on the talk page. -- Sweet xx 00:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Your edit in Reddy
I don't know why you put the Template at the bottom.Just check Kamma,Vellalar and Iyer pages.They all have the templates at the top.-Raghavan(Talk) 14:18, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Anyway,a big thanks for removing all those sites like ReddyMatrimony and all.They don't serve a purpose in that page.-Raghavan(Talk) 14:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
hello! nice to meet you!
oh, banana is rearly active! then, what do banana mean?--Saehayae (talk) 15:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- ah, OK! you're a very weety person! (er....have 'weety' bad mean? Because i'm not good at English, i am a little hesitated.)--Saehayae (talk) 16:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Nigahiga#Videography_Removed
Hello Active Banana, you're invited to take part in the above discussion concerning this edit that you made to nigahiga. Regards, Airplaneman ✈ 03:12, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- I've responded again. Airplaneman ✈ 16:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- I've proposed a new format; how is it? Airplaneman ✈ 21:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
MichaelJackson231 (talk) 09:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Help
Regard Ibo Bonilla’s article. Thank you so much for your kindness dear Active Banana. I read the suggested links. At this moment I am working on academic investigation about public squares in Costa Rica, and I have additional information, references and quotes. But I need help to reach the required standard from Misplaced Pages. In this opportunity only I translate to Spanish an existing page and another one that initiated in English by Misplaced Pages system. If you could help me, I will be able to learn and then continue working on some other articles.--Axxis10 (talk) 23:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
welcome message
Hi Active Banana, thanks a lot for your message on my discussion page, I appreciate it very much! Keep in touch! Happy day and cheerio, Isabella Othertwice1504 (talk) 14:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
translate
Hi I took it out and noticed it is a new cite, it is in a video but in Chinese, its something about 200 days sitting, possibly in detention but its rubbish anyway imo I am not putting it back as I am unable to verify the details, I will leave it with you...
google translate Off2riorob (talk) 14:39, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
You can use the translate to translate almost anything, just add the http address and change the languages and its good to go, no perfect but it helps. Off2riorob (talk) 14:41, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Major issue with this user is his seeming inability to discuss (perhaps a language problem) and his copyright violations, best of luck. Off2riorob (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Welcome
Thank you for the welcome. Ally74 (talk) 16:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
list of the boondocks episodes
Is there a reason that you keep undoing my edit about the pages that were deleted? Inka 888 02:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inka 888 (talk • contribs There should be a link to the the pages in red saying page does not exist so people can recreate the page.(Inka 888 15:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Inka 888 15:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)) So your saying that every article on list that was deleted should not be recreated? I was not a part of the deletion discussion but i dont all of those pages were deleted for the same reason. (Inka 888 15:42, 19 August 2010 (UTC)) I don't think every thing in season 3 was deleted yet i think it was the discussion was still going on. (Inka 888 15:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inka 888 (talk • contribs) Thats one there were alot more that were not closed yet. (Inka 888 16:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inka 888 (talk • contribs)
Christopher Herrod
Herrod is a state legislator; those are inherently notable, and should not be tagged for notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- He's in the state House, not the Senate; see current version of article. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
your user page
just wondering how did you get a picture on your page? I am trying to do that with my page and i can't figure out how to do it. Inka 888 (talk) 23:21, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Inka 888 (talk) 23:21, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
pictures
I read about the upload files thing you told me about the picture i want to use is nt on the web, how do upload a picture from your computer. Inka 888 (talk) 18:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
I got the picture i wanted to use on wikipedia but i can't get the picture on my user page if you look at my user page it just has a URL on it not the picture. Inka 888 (talk) 01:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
how do you give it copyright information? Inka 888 (talk) 15:58, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
How do i get a cobyright template on the picture's page? Inka 888 (talk) 16:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
signatures
I also am trying to find out how to make a signature. Every time i sign a page it does not turn blue i dont understand that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inka 888 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 19 August 2010 (UTC) I do type in four tildes and it does not make a blue link to my user page or talk page. How did you make your signature? Inka 888 18:50, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
How do you make a custom signature? Inka 888 (talk) 19:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
typo
Yes, 'twas, thanks! --Nuujinn (talk) 22:06, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
another User:Dico Calingal sock?
Hi! Just want to bring to your attention regarding this "new" user (User:EternityInThePast). It's just weird that he posted this comment on my talk page regarding his uploaded audio samples. Please note that this guy also edits the same articles (Regine Velasquez, Mel and Joey, etc.) as the sockmaster and the previously blocked sockpuppet (User:Marco Carlo). -WayKurat (talk) 15:18, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Zhou Libo personal life
Here's a translated source about the accident. . Please reconsider the deletion of the source and statements: http://www.911usa.com.cn/info/post/1026/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.6.19.192 (talk) 10:43, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Send me one when you have a moment, please. Toddst1 (talk) 18:49, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
For helping with the many socks of "Dr." Mukesh. Shahid • 21:06, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Citation internal format in Bruce Harris
Discuss at Talk:Bruce Harris, please. --Lexein (talk) 05:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Advizor Solutions
you deleted segments of the Advizor Solutions article saying that it was "promotional crap". It was simply listing information about products the company has to offer in an unbiased way. The fact that the company offers these products is fact-based.--Benj2199 (talk) 15:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- view the wiki page for Tableau Software. They are listing products. how does this differ?--Benj2199 (talk) 15:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Can you please respond to my question about Tableau Software? I'm simply trying to create a truthful, accurate and unbiased Misplaced Pages entry while abiding by all rules and guidelines. However, it becomes confusing when I try to imitate the format from another Misplaced Pages entry and you're telling me it not allowed. Why is this format of listing a company's products allowed in some cases but not in others? --Benj2199 (talk) 15:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
So, if I listed products offered by Advizor then added citations, would this eliminate the label of "promotional crap"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benj2199 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your help. So, the Article talk page is not viewed by the same editorial standards as the main article page? --Benj2199 (talk) 16:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Help
Hi, this is Farjad. I need your help in roll-backing over 20 minor edits by an unregistered user, IP 112.207.96.228, on List of Korean musicians...without any explanation s/he deleted many entries...(I think s/he is confused whether singers belong to category of musicians...yes they do...music is music...whether it is vocalist or instrumental...or combined). Could you please revert those edits and ask him to discuss before making such changes. Thanks! Farjad0322 (talk) 20:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Advizor Solutions
Thanks for adding them. I should have moved them there myself. Toddst1 (talk) 00:19, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
fastily's talk page
what i said on fastily's talk page was assuming good faith because i phrased it as a question. I did not accuse him of using a sockpuppet account. Inka 00:29, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I think User:Jrod2 may have been a little over-reactive in his/her response. Active Banana ( 00:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Personally, I disagree. A heading of "possible sock puppet", with an edit summary of "possible sock", while the Fastily Sock account is clearly tagged that it is an alternate account, with links to the appropriate policies as to why it's permitted...hard to push AGF that far when there's a history of both a) not reading and b) huge misunderstanding of a wide range of policies. While I appreciate that Inka tries to communicate, the answer to the question was right in front of them in black and white ... (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:03, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
The heading Was POSSIBLE sock. I did not say any thing for sure. Inka 13:21, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Pamela Geller
ActiveBanana, I think you are trying to be constructive, but perhaps you are not sufficiently aware that there is ongoing debate on the Geller article about what constitutes appropriate sourcing in this article. Your addition of the tag really isn't necessary - people already know that - and indeed it is a little provocative in the present climate. I hope you will please proceed with caution. Thank you. Arjuna (talk) 02:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
MBLAQ
Hi Active Banana, i wasn't making MBLAQ into a fanpage, if i was, there'd be heaps of pictures and more random information. The section was called 'Trivia' for a reason.Imaginazn (talk) 04:56, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Pamela Geller
Please read the Talk page. Discussion IS going on about this. Flatterworld (talk) 15:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
The Pin-Ups
You might want to look at the licensing for the main pic; I could be mistaken, but I don't see how it could possibly be considered a screenshot of software. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 15:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
List of Korean musicians
Hi! Please participate in the discussion for criteria of listing at Talk:List of Korean musicians. Thanks! Farjad0322 (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Reliable sources
May I please get a list of reliable and non-reliable sources? I don't see how we are supposed to know which is which. BollyJeff || talk 18:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Webpage Deleted
Hello, Active Banana. You have placed many alerts on my page. I have already discussed with another administrator why I believe this person is relevant (donations, being a CEO, etc.) What can I do to prevent deletion and to get the unsightly tags off the page. Thanks GiniChen (talk) 19:27, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Hitler's last brownie
Thanks for the smile, it reminded me of the George Carlin construct "I'm going down to the softball field and beat up Hitler's widow". --CliffC (talk) 20:44, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Despicable Me.
Talkback. Please discuss the prose describing the box office figures. Talk:Despicable_Me#Box office -- Horkana (talk) 23:10, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion tag on Ngayong Nandito Ka declined
Hi Active Banana, I've declined your A7 tag for Ngayong Nandito Ka. WP:CSD#A7 doesn't apply to films. I cite this part of the criterion: "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works." This is a creative work. It does, however, look like a good candidate for AfD. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 03:32, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Patricia Mae Santos RfPP request
Hi there. I've actioned your request at RfPP for page protection. However, as I explained there, I really think this needs to be discussed wider, either at AfD or RfD (probably AfD). I'm hoping you're working on a computer with a script/twinkle installed that will make it easy for you to set these up, as I'm working manually at the moment and AfDs are so fiddly. Let me know if you can, otherwise I'll do it later today when I'm at home. GedUK 09:22, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Lionelt's talk page.
Hello. You have a new message at Lionelt's talk page.
Please correct
Hello, while you edited today Eido Shimnao page you reverted my edits in Bibliography. Why? Tao did the same. This had nothing to do section allegations. Please reinstate my edits to Bibliography ASAP. Also I do not know why you reinserted the section allegations in present form. The language of it is obviously inappropriate to BLP and in sources provided by Tao version there is nothing to support the wording of it. Previous version done by Slp1 was agreed by consensus during long discussion. Please, read these discussions carefully? Obviously two added sources you questioned are not valid. Thank you. Spt51 (talk) 17:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- The edits were made in Bibliography, if someone reverts entire article the Bibliography was reverted too. This is not what should be done. Thanks.Spt51 (talk) 17:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Edits on All India Trinamool Congress
I don't really see it as a BLP vio. It seems like it has a bit of undue weight, and a little negatively phrased, but everything there (I think) is included in the articles. Why do you see it as a BLP vio? NativeForeigner /Contribs 03:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- I hadnt fully read the second source. The first source was phrasing everything as vague allegations while the proposed phrasing in the article was stating connections as facts. After fully reading the second source I realized that they were making more concrete statements and BLP was not appropriate validation for immediate withdrawal of the statements from our article. Active Banana ( 13:30, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
The Saturdays
You're removing useful information of The Saturdays page, stop removing it, THANKYOU! --92.16.114.116 (talk) 19:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Geller
Huh. Thanks. That's odd. Well, I think we generally give fairly wide leeway for people and entities to describe themselves how they describe themselves; if someone has a WP:RS that questions that belief then we can summarize the dispute, but absent good sourcing for calling that into question I don't see any reason to throw that kind of water on someone's own opinions about what they believe. Do you? Does such sourcing exist? — e. ripley\ 20:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Okay. Well, I don't see any sources provided so I see no reason not to allow her to describe her own views, absent someone questioning how close they are to Rand's in a published source. — e. ripley\ 20:18, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Also thanks for the pointers and messages, I just dipped my toe in the article and haven't been following any of the editing history. — e. ripley\ 20:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Absolutely. Thanks again. Hanging up the bananaphone! — e. ripley\ 20:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Also thanks for the pointers and messages, I just dipped my toe in the article and haven't been following any of the editing history. — e. ripley\ 20:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
The Saturdays
After my undid edition it was red template. Sorry. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 20:35, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Dealing with uncited sources
Active Banana, even though I support your recent removal of material in Information security because of the material's poor quality, I figured that you indiscriminately remove information you find uncited. I highly discourage such actions when they concern information that is neither incorrect nor potentially libelous or otherwise discreditive as they are ultimately detrimental to building up a knowledge base. I support removal of material tagged with {dubious} and all uncited information in BLPs, but text that is not even potentially harmful should only be deleted when understood to be wrong or when obviously doubtful. My 2 cents, Nageh (talk) 20:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC) (Feel free to reply here or on my talk page.)
- I think we are actually talking about Computer security. Active Banana ( 21:06, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oops, right. Sorry, my bad. Please find a reply on my talk page. Nageh (talk) 21:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC) Another reply on my talk page. Thanks. Nageh (talk) 22:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- I pointed out two specific edits on my talk page which - at first sight - I think could have been better left and improved instead of simply deleted. Nageh (talk) 22:22, 31 August 2010 (UTC) - Just as another note, I hope you understand there is nothing personal here. :) Nageh (talk) 22:23, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
RE: Tangled Up Tour
Deletion review/Log/2008 April 4 - it says another AfD can occur in the future if there are still concerns. I don't think deleting the article at your discretion is the appropriate resolution to your concerns. XL XR2 (talk) 22:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Regine Velasquez
You know Active Banana i just wanna say something, i know that also a administrator of Misplaced Pages, but it's not right that you're editing article too much, okay let say in word that you're cleaning her article and posting notes above that figuring the article was incomplete, some of the article inside doesn't had any source, etc.. but it's not right to delete some facts inside of it and editing it in a ugly way, like the article for theater, television you'd delete the facts inside of it and remove the formality tucked on it.you're taking it personally and make it dirty. its not right and ill gonna bring it to the higher administrator if you're still making regine velasquez article in ugly way.thank you
- oh really?? ok let say that you're only doing this for an instance, and how can you explain about the page of Regine Velasquez in the "theater and television" they had the descriptions and little facts there that you'd remove, and the one that you didn't remove is the darna with the description of "her first villain role in television" why you didn't remove that? although the rest of the descriptions you'd deleted already? explain before you complain. thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.207.60.150 (talk) 13:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
He never learns, does he?!
Now you tell me would you spend/waste so much of your precious time for nothing, knowing that it won't help? That's becoming increasingly entertaining. Any idea of more effective ways to catch him from the outset, before he even starts editing these articles? That would make him tired way before expected, I believe. Thanks again for dealing with it and helping out as you usually do. It's appreciated. Shahid • 21:49, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks...
...for your contribution to the article Caveman! Chrisrus (talk) 22:10, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/Xeltek_Inc.
Hi, I see that you have just edited my article on Xeltek Inc. I see that you have erased a lot of content from the History section in which I guess you said the reason is for un-sourced promotion claim/hype. I see that this page http://en.wikipedia.org/Elnec a company which basically does the same thing.(I remember reading about if A is on here why can't B be on here but I forget the term for it) If I use a source from a company that is already on Misplaced Pages, should it not be a reliable source? If multiple notable companies have written about this company does that not make it notable? Junjoon (talk) 17:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
José Dominguez - My defense
Hi there ACTIVE BANANA, VASCO here,
Please excuse me if i got out of hand in my summary, just that an anon "user" removed an entire chunk of storyline without any word in summary, and that really gets me going. Not justifying anything, just that my tolerance to vandalism is growing ever so smaller.
Have a happy weekend, sorry for any incovenience - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 03:39, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Please read this message i have sent User:Struway, it will elaborate on my original text (see here http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Struway2#Jos.C3.A9_Dominguez_-_My_defense). - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 19:03, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
1.8.7
Careful with your edits!! You backtracked something bordering on libel (Unless you don't consider material that invokes threats troublesome.) I added the page to the watch list for living persons. Quaranj (talk) 02:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Attention Concerning Paisley (design) Vandal
I just want to let you know that the vandal IP, 70.16.53.239, is an anonymous, returning vandal who repeatedly returns to insert that inane hypothesis that the Paisley design is based off of leeches.--Mr Fink (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
- Weirder behavior? You mean like that one vandal at Timecube who tried to square everything?--Mr Fink (talk) 16:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Common names
Hello once again Active Banana. You recently changed stage names of Shinee members to their actual names. I would request you read this if you have not already. Thanks!
Farjad0322 20:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for noticing. Working on articles like this is always slow, but it does take a lot of patience, I think, to keep from just spinning your wheels endlessly. All best, Mackan79 (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
No bot fight
Just obsessive tweaking.
Siti Nurhaliza
Hi, I noticed that you have tagged Siti Nurhaliza article with "Fan's point of view" tag. Please help me in pointing which part of the article is problematic, cause I'm using Mariah Carey and Beyonce's article as references on how to rewrite the article where both articles are either Featured Article or Good Article. I'm on my way of removing peacock words and providing reliable links for the article.Syfuel (talk) 08:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. For the first point, it can't be helped, she has been always addressed as "Siti", because it is a Malay name, refer this Malay Names, for that, I've added a description on top of the article: This is a Malay name; the name "Tarudin" is a patronymic, not a family name, and the person should be referred to by the given name, "Siti Nurhaliza". For the second one, I think I better remove that part, because it is kinda hard to find sources way back in the 90's to support that. For the third one, I'll try my best, but so far, none of the sources came from her recording company except from her official website and newspapers. And I have been trying to clean all the links by added reliable sources. Thanks for the heads-up. :) Syfuel (talk) 09:13, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- As all of the things that you have found out as problematic has been discussed and solved, I have removed the tag. If you still think some parts of the article are still problematic, please simply point it to me, and I'll try to solve it immediately as sometimes I do need some advices from the other party to improve the article to the highest level possible.Syfuel (talk) 10:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
September 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Telecom Expense Management (TEM). Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 18:29, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Kamen Rider Verde
You had previously edited at the AFD for Kamen Rider Verde, at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kamen Rider Verde. There is now an AFD for a related page, at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kamen Rider Ryuki Special: 13 Riders. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
re Kamen Rider
Agreed, perhaps you could take care of the legwork on compiling/merging AFDs into a mass nomination? I will defer to your prior expertise in that arena, but please do keep me posted. It appears most of these WP:NOR-violating articles fail WP:NOTE, and lack significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. -- Cirt (talk) 21:27, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion#How_to_list_multiple_related_pages_for_deletion. That should help you! :) -- Cirt (talk) 21:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Kamen Rider
Cirt is ignoring me so I am not going to bother saying this to him. I have personally merged every single character article under the auspice of Kamen Rider Ryuki to List of Kamen Rider Ryuki characters. As I can predict, you have also been looking at the other various articles in this franchise, so I am going to take it upon myself to simply merge whatever I can. I hope that the series from 2007 onwards are fine, as they are chock full of references, both primary and secondary. Rather then sending the entirety of the individual pages in Category:Kamen Rider characters to AFD, I would appreciate your assistance in merging everyting from Agito, 555, Blade, Hibiki, and Kabuto.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
I got rid of all the damn individual pages for these characters and put it into a list. What the hell is your problem with it?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Also you !voted delete twice here.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 19:27, 14 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Cant take that away from me
Someone has added Youtube, plus a redcarpet.com source (displayong tweets/twits) and more rap-up sources. I still dont think that's notable. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 23:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, newbie
I would have thought new stuff went at the top - like email.
I kept checking the page and it looked like my entry had been deleted.
SelectSplat (talk) 02:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
WP: Trivia
Dont' use that on me. Let me refresh your mind. WP: Trivia does not promote removal of isolated information/trivia or removing trivia sections. It does not suggest the inclusion or exclusion of any information; it only gives style recommendations.
The edit was in accordance to WP: Actors and Filmmakers's project style recommendations.
Don't go moving around moving other people's edits. You don't own Misplaced Pages -- y'know?58.71.79.8 (talk) 02:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
AIV
You may like to know that you have made it onto Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Here is my response. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
nambla
Hi Active Banana, the Delany context now comprises half of the lede. IMO this isn't good style. Do you object to moving the bulk of the item to a section, i.e. Criticism and response, and leaving a summarization in the lede? Lionel (talk) 21:37, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
LOL
I thought you'd find this funny... . So apparently this comment you left on my talk page was us having a conflict. LOL -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 01:31, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
- My guess is that that was meant to be this comment you left on Lil-unique1's talk page. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:48, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
- it defo has an air of sock puppetry around it. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 01:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
You may also be interested in this comment on the subject. The canvassing it refers to is in these edits: , , . JamesBWatson (talk) 14:48, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
DRV
Hi, a couple of articles that you redirected are being discussed over at DRV. Reyk YO! 19:35, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Savoy Opera Society
Thanks. What do you think of this one? Edinburgh University Savoy Opera Group. It's a pretty old group, but not, IMO, any more notable. Note that it was deleted once before (see talk page). -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Altaf Hussain
I agree with this reversion because it's off-topic and not supported by the given ref. But just a heads-up because I assume if you watch this page you may also watch other related ones...the statement added to the article appears to be correct per multiple news outlets. DMacks (talk) 21:48, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Sunni view of the Sahaba
fair enough. but what does tagged for 2 years mean??Suenahrme (talk) 00:43, 17 September 2010 (UTC) oh ok. but its a shame that so much content had to be removed. there was some good sourced content that was also removed. ah well!!!!Suenahrme (talk) 00:49, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
can we use what sunni scholars say??? is that valid sources??? or do they only have to be secular historical sources??? thanks.Suenahrme (talk) 00:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC) hello are you still there??? i have started restructuring the article.Suenahrme (talk) 01:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC) ok i gotta go now. appreciate if you answer my questions.Suenahrme (talk) 01:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Elie
I wasn't acquainted with they reverted my changes. Thanks a lot. I will restore the changes.--213.97.61.24 (talk) 15:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
If talk pages are censored at this level, it will be impossible improving the article.--213.97.61.24 (talk) 15:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Reply
Hey friend. First, you are one of the users I respect, so you cannot blame me of not assuming good faith on you. But a box office success is a common term which is definitely acceptable and it is cited in newspapers, books, Misplaced Pages's own FAs and other reputed sources. If a film is described as a box office success or hit (which is, BTW, also acceptable if properly sourced) it simply means that it recovered its costs and even more, thereby getting a popular reception by the wide audience. The sources we cite perfectly help to explain what the status is because there are verdicts mentioned in them. By saying "the film grossed..." you do nothing because nobody really knows what Rs. 40 crore means, if it's good or bad. However, when such numbers or positions are mentioned additionally it could be well better, because it states a fact which is verified by a number (for example, "The film did well at the BO, grossing XXX million"). All that is of course while considering proper sourcing, and a good quality of prose. I'm ready to discuss it more, but I disagree with the clarification you've requested. It couldn't be clearer than this. Shahid • 17:28, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
John Prendergast
the person who took the photo of john prendergast requested that he be credited with the photo. Nell 22:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Please help
Why did Andonic delete me on Death of Hitler? Gwen? Thank you!Wm5200 (talk) 01:57, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Question
How do you prevent an anti-vandal enthusiast from becoming complacent?
You call him "Scruffy" 100,000 times. Look for a major re-editing of your talk page to include the word 100,000 times. n. I plan to do it at noon eastern time tomorrow. Scruffy. By the way, I am going to attack all of the pages I attach this message to at that same time. 71.178.55.113 (talk) 08:10, 18 September 2010 (UTC)