| Revision as of 01:44, 11 November 2010 editWeijiBaikeBianji (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,316 edits General note: Not assuming good faith on High IQ society. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:51, 11 November 2010 edit undoWoodsrock (talk | contribs)145 edits →November 2010Next edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| == November 2010 == | == November 2010 == | ||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you ] while interacting with other editors, which you did not on ]. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-agf1 --> ''Your edit summaries are more useful to the thousands of other editors who edit Misplaced Pages when you refer to a rationale for the article (or template) text to be as you prefer rather than malign an edit as a "crank" or "bizarre" or "strange" edit. Misplaced Pages has rules about ] and those rules are specifically mentioned in the ] to which the articles you have been editing recently are subject. I look forward to much civil discussion with you about what the best sources on the article topics say and how those articles can best reflect those sources with due weight to differing points of view. -- ] (], ]) 01:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC) '' ] (], ]) 01:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you ] while interacting with other editors, which you did not on ]. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-agf1 --> ''Your edit summaries are more useful to the thousands of other editors who edit Misplaced Pages when you refer to a rationale for the article (or template) text to be as you prefer rather than malign an edit as a "crank" or "bizarre" or "strange" edit. Misplaced Pages has rules about ] and those rules are specifically mentioned in the ] to which the articles you have been editing recently are subject. I look forward to much civil discussion with you about what the best sources on the article topics say and how those articles can best reflect those sources with due weight to differing points of view. -- ] (], ]) 01:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC) '' ] (], ]) 01:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| You do not have good faith - you are on a dishonest mission of some sort. ] (]) 01:51, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:51, 11 November 2010
Welcome...
Hello, Woodsrock, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
I see you've just developed a new template for articles related to human intelligence. I'm wondering if you've seen the source list on that subject I keep in user space for all Wikipedians to use. Perhaps you know of some sources you would like to suggest as additions to that source list. Welcome aboard.
Again, welcome! WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 03:45, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement
Hello, an arbitration enforcement request about an issue you've been involved in has recently been posted here: Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#WeijiBaikeBianji -Ferahgo the Assassin (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Feel free to provide a rationale for article edits or template edits in the talk pages.
Hi, Woodsrock, I see you are still quite new here, and quite active in editing articles related to the recently decided Arbitration Committee case. It has historically been difficult to bring about editor collaboration in the proper Misplaced Pages way in many of the articles related to that case, perhaps because editors come to those articles with their minds already made up from having read just a few sources, but I'm optimistic that that situation is improving recently as more editors are reading more and better sources (which you and all editors are always welcome to contribute to the joint list). Let's discuss on appropriate talk pages for articles or for templates what edits best represent current reliable sources on those sometimes very contentious subjects. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 01:37, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on High IQ society. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Your edit summaries are more useful to the thousands of other editors who edit Misplaced Pages when you refer to a rationale for the article (or template) text to be as you prefer rather than malign an edit as a "crank" or "bizarre" or "strange" edit. Misplaced Pages has rules about editor civility and those rules are specifically mentioned in the active arbitration sanctions to which the articles you have been editing recently are subject. I look forward to much civil discussion with you about what the best sources on the article topics say and how those articles can best reflect those sources with due weight to differing points of view. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 01:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC) WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 01:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
You do not have good faith - you are on a dishonest mission of some sort. Woodsrock (talk) 01:51, 11 November 2010 (UTC)