| Revision as of 08:42, 16 December 2010 edit69.22.185.187 (talk) →Savillo← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:43, 16 December 2010 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,321 editsm Signing comment by 69.22.185.187 - "→Savillo: "Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :I'm not sure what's going on here, and I'm definitely not involved, but this kind of sounds like a ] that you might want to report to ] or an ].--] (]) 23:10, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | :I'm not sure what's going on here, and I'm definitely not involved, but this kind of sounds like a ] that you might want to report to ] or an ].--] (]) 23:10, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::CaC, I responded to your query on my talk page. CurtisSwain's recommendation is also very appropriate—especially given the follow-up post here that I did not see before. --] (]) 01:01, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | ::CaC, I responded to your query on my talk page. CurtisSwain's recommendation is also very appropriate—especially given the follow-up post here that I did not see before. --] (]) 01:01, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::I already reported the stupidity of CaC 155.99.230.57 (talk) to the wikipedia's noticeboard. | ::I already reported the stupidity of CaC 155.99.230.57 (talk) to the wikipedia's noticeboard. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
Revision as of 08:43, 16 December 2010
Savillo
I can accuse in court , Savillo never wrote this.. why sentence by Savillo????— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.31.68.51 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- The sentence I removed had a citation to Savillo. If just I said "Sentence removed," the sentence I would be referring to would be ambiguous. I didn't mean to imply anything beyond that. --CaC 155.99.230.57 (talk) 21:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
I don't think so. You did that directly sacrificing someone's name when he doesn't even know that his name is being cited. This still needs to be heard. You have to pay for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.185.186 (talk) 22:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- To CaC 155.99.230.57:
- I'm not sure what's going on here, and I'm definitely not involved, but this kind of sounds like a threat that you might want to report to Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or an administrator.--CurtisSwain (talk) 23:10, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- CaC, I responded to your query on my talk page. CurtisSwain's recommendation is also very appropriate—especially given the follow-up post here that I did not see before. --Airborne84 (talk) 01:01, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- I already reported the stupidity of CaC 155.99.230.57 (talk) to the wikipedia's noticeboard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.185.187 (talk) 08:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)