Misplaced Pages

User talk:BlennGeck: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:08, 16 February 2011 editJohnCD (talk | contribs)130,355 edits unblock declined← Previous edit Revision as of 20:26, 16 February 2011 edit undoBlennGeck (talk | contribs)171 edits BlockedNext edit →
Line 46: Line 46:


:Socking while blocked is a gross violation of the rules. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 19:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC) :Socking while blocked is a gross violation of the rules. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 19:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

But that isn't my account. I am not able to log in as that user and do as you suggest. Same IP doesn't equal guilt. ] (]) 20:26, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:26, 16 February 2011

Welcome!

Hello, BlennGeck! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jojhutton (talk) 00:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Canvassing and sock puppetry

Blenn. You may not be familiar with the rules, but you may want to familiarize yourself with WP:CANVASS and WP:SOCKPUPPET. Going to the pages of users you deem "reasonable" Redthoreau, to ask for help on adding Kristol's criticism to Beck's article, as well as bringing it up on Kristol's talk page could be seen as canvassing. Posting selectively under the IP address 24.61.171.248(who has 2 vandalism warnings) can also be seen as sockpuppeting. accidental IP post and self revert, reinsertion of material under Blenn Geck to link it together for others.AerobicFox (talk) 23:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit:Never mind the sock puppetry. If you haven't edited with the IP intentionally since creating your account then it isn't a problem.AerobicFox (talk) 00:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
It appears you were formally another Glenn Beck SPA named LynnCityofsin. the same IP you just used, editing Lynns post over a year agoAerobicFox (talk) 01:07, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Do not accuse me things. Especially when you know nothing about me. BlennGeck (talk) 01:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Buddy, I wasn't canvassing. I was asking for advice on what a user can do about a poster like you, who appears to be intent on blocking content no simply because he doesn't like it. It was a policy/admin question. BlennGeck (talk) 00:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

"advice on what a user can do about a poster like you"
No, you were asking what could be done about me specifically to a user who has disagreed with me previously on another topic on that page, seemingly in a shallow ploy to get them to come to the page and disagree with me again. If you have a question to ask, then you are supposed to ask a general, non-specific question at an unrelated forum, and not what you did here.AerobicFox (talk) 01:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I wanted to know if there was a way to bring your activities to the attention of an admin, so there could be a third party evaluation. Again that isn't canvassing. No, I wasn't asking him to come onto the talk page and weigh in against you. Please stop accusing me of things. BlennGeck (talk) 01:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

I was advising you that these activities "could be seen as canvassing" as a polite way to not say "this is clearly canvassing". Please don't my advice as an accusation, and then argue against said accusation which is probably true.AerobicFox (talk) 01:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm not taking your advice as an accusation, I am taking your accusations as accusations. If you don't stop, I will seek arbitration. BlennGeck (talk) 01:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Notice of ani discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.AerobicFox (talk) 01:40, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, BlennGeck. You have new messages at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Message added 03:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Misplaced Pages policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

The Cavalry (Message me) 11:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BlennGeck (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have very good personal reasons for my IP and sharing the banned user's interest in Beck. Also, I have not violated any wiki policies that I am aware of using this account. I did not engage in edit warring or anything of the sort (as the banned user did). My approach has been one of discussion and presenting well sourced material to support my arguments. I would just add, that it seems I was targeted by several users in order to have me removed from the Glenn Beck talk page. A page with a reputation for problems. BlennGeck (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have been confirmed by checkuser as a sockpuppet of blocked user Deliciousgrapefruit (talk) - see WP:AN/I#Gaming the system and canvassing. Any unblock request must be made on that account. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Socking while blocked is a gross violation of the rules. ←Baseball Bugs carrots19:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

But that isn't my account. I am not able to log in as that user and do as you suggest. Same IP doesn't equal guilt. BlennGeck (talk) 20:26, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

User talk:BlennGeck: Difference between revisions Add topic