Misplaced Pages

User talk:DieSwartzPunkt: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:00, 26 March 2011 editDieSwartzPunkt (talk | contribs)3,096 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 09:00, 26 March 2011 edit undo74.36.101.187 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
:I'm entitled to remove closed discussions from my own talk page. ] (]) 08:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC) :I'm entitled to remove closed discussions from my own talk page. ] (]) 08:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


{{unblock|reason=The edit concerned was removal of non current and past discussions from my own talk page. This seems to be common practice. Also, the block has come after a warning.}} {{unblock reviewed | 1=The edit concerned was removal of non current and past discussions from my own talk page. This seems to be common practice | decline={{subst:Repeatedly deleting content and replacing it with cocks is not acceptable}} ] (]) 09:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 09:00, 26 March 2011

March 26

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Misplaced Pages again, as you did at User talk:DieSwartzPunkt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 74.36.101.187 (talk) 08:52, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
I'm entitled to remove closed discussions from my own talk page. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 08:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DieSwartzPunkt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The edit concerned was removal of non current and past discussions from my own talk page. This seems to be common practice

Decline reason:

{{subst:Repeatedly deleting content and replacing it with cocks is not acceptable}} 74.36.101.187 (talk) 09:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User talk:DieSwartzPunkt: Difference between revisions Add topic