| Revision as of 15:53, 5 May 2011 editBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,376 edits →File source problem with File:Hannah de Rothschild.jpg: Not a real problem, just the problem that we aren't humble enough in the face of templates.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:45, 5 May 2011 edit undoScott MacDonald (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,363 edits →for your amusement: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| *I know you're not in the mood for the above, Giacomo. I've written to Sfan00 IMG on his talk, as from a template hater to a template lover. ] | ] 15:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC). | *I know you're not in the mood for the above, Giacomo. I've written to Sfan00 IMG on his talk, as from a template hater to a template lover. ] | ] 15:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC). | ||
| == for your amusement == | |||
| ].--] 16:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:45, 5 May 2011
Old messages are at:
- User talk:Giano II/archive 1 (From Oct 2004)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 2 (From Jan 2005)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 3 (From July 2005)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 4 (From Jan 2006)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 5 (From July 2006)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 6 (From Jan 2007)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 7 (From July 2007)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 8 (From Jan 2008)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 9 (From July 2008)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 10 (From Jan 2009)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 11 (From July 2009)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 12 (From Jan 2010)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 13 (From July 2010)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 14 (From Jan 2011)
Please leave new messages below
Unfinished business with Simon Byrne
I finally got my finger out and have done a bit more to this; I think it's at least ready for a shot at GAN now. Malleus Fatuorum 22:22, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Do you? I took him off the watchlist months ago. Giacomo Returned 22:26, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- I've nominated him anyway, we'll see what happens. Malleus Fatuorum 22:37, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- We shall indeed. You do what you think best. Personally, I prefer my version I think your version looks a little sterile, but I'm sure it meets all the rules. Progress, I suppose. Giacomo Returned 21:18, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm conscious that my version is rather less flowery than yours, but them's the rules these days. Malleus Fatuorum 21:22, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sure that you are right. That's why I don't do FAs and GAS any more; I like to appeal to kids and educate rather than appease people to those making rules. Anyway, c'est la vie. Giacomo Returned 21:32, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Job done. I'm quite able to write flowery prose, but what I can't do is to get it past either GAN or FAC. So far as Simon Byrne is concerned I'm sure he's now quite close to being an FA again, but I don't have have access to the few sources needed for that final push, and I'm not sure it would be worth the effort anyway. It's a decent enough article as it is. Malleus Fatuorum 23:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sure that you are right. That's why I don't do FAs and GAS any more; I like to appeal to kids and educate rather than appease people to those making rules. Anyway, c'est la vie. Giacomo Returned 21:32, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm conscious that my version is rather less flowery than yours, but them's the rules these days. Malleus Fatuorum 21:22, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- We shall indeed. You do what you think best. Personally, I prefer my version I think your version looks a little sterile, but I'm sure it meets all the rules. Progress, I suppose. Giacomo Returned 21:18, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- I've nominated him anyway, we'll see what happens. Malleus Fatuorum 22:37, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Hannah de Rothschild.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Hannah de Rothschild.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:06, 5 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Misplaced Pages's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:06, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- I know you're not in the mood for the above, Giacomo. I've written to Sfan00 IMG on his talk, as from a template hater to a template lover. Bishonen | talk 15:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC).
for your amusement
Otto (Middleton family dog).--Scott Mac 16:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC)