Revision as of 07:55, 9 March 2009 edit76.66.193.90 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:39, 2 June 2011 edit undoMakeSense64 (talk | contribs)4,127 edits →Merger Proposal: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
This article does not present the mainstream astrological definition and usage of combust. | This article does not present the mainstream astrological definition and usage of combust. | ||
== Merger Proposal == | |||
I propose that ] be merged into ]. Both topics are closely related and after merging the other long term issues with both articles can be solved. ] (]) 07:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:39, 2 June 2011
Astrology NA‑class | |||||||
|
Proposed merge into Heliacal rising
With all due respect to those interested in astrology or astronomy, this article is about a highly technical, arcane and estoric subject. I am strongly in favor of merging it into Heliacal rising, which is much more understandable, or else deleting this article entirely. - mbeychok 21:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Combust is not the same as heliacal rising -- heliacal rising deals with a planet's position on the horizon (more specifically a rising planet's/star's position on the eastern horizon), while combust deals with a planet's position in close conjunction with the Sun (irregardless of the horizon). I hope this clears things up for you. --172.162.216.137 13:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
This article does not present the mainstream astrological definition and usage of combust.
Merger Proposal
I propose that Cazimi_(astrological_aspect) be merged into Combust_(astrological_aspect). Both topics are closely related and after merging the other long term issues with both articles can be solved. MakeSense64 (talk) 07:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Categories: