| Revision as of 01:05, 6 June 2011 edit24.177.120.138 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:06, 6 June 2011 edit undoHorologium (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,567 editsm Reverted edits by 24.177.120.138 (talk) to last version by HorologiumNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div style="position: fixed; right:0; bottom:0; display:block; height:{{{1|150}}}px; width:{{{1|150}}}px;"><div style="position: relative; width: {{{1|150}}}px; height: {{{1|150}}}px; overflow: lolz"><div style="position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; font-size: 300px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 300px; z-index: 3">]</div> | |||
| <div style="position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; z-index: 2">]</div></div></div> | |||
| {{Unblock|Requesting review of block validity. This is a content dispute.}} | {{Unblock|Requesting review of block validity. This is a content dispute.}} | ||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| * - reversions: (see also other warnings in this talk page's history, and comments at WQA). ] (]) 00:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ::Blanking other users comments is vandalism. 3RR doesn't apply to reverting vandalism. ] (]) 00:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :::Clearly you are playing games, otherwise you would not do the exact same thing on this talk page...right after requesting review of this very block on the same page. Do it again and you will lose your ability to edit this page as well. ] (]) 00:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:06, 6 June 2011
24.177.120.138 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Requesting review of block validity. This is a content dispute.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Requesting review of block validity. This is a content dispute. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Requesting review of block validity. This is a content dispute. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Requesting review of block validity. This is a content dispute. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- First edit - reversions: 1 2 3 indication he knew what 3RR was 4 5 (see also other warnings in this talk page's history, and comments at WQA). Ncmvocalist (talk) 00:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Blanking other users comments is vandalism. 3RR doesn't apply to reverting vandalism. 24.177.120.138 (talk) 00:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Clearly you are playing games, otherwise you would not do the exact same thing on this talk page...right after requesting review of this very block on the same page. Do it again and you will lose your ability to edit this page as well. Ncmvocalist (talk) 00:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Blanking other users comments is vandalism. 3RR doesn't apply to reverting vandalism. 24.177.120.138 (talk) 00:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)