| Revision as of 21:10, 5 July 2011 editZachariel (talk | contribs)Rollbackers3,655 edits →Contested deletion: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:17, 6 July 2011 edit undoAquirata (talk | contribs)1,411 edits →Contested deletion: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| This page should not be speedy deleted because... a good variety of editors have contributed towards the content. The content is potentially very useful as a catalogue of reputable astrological associations, some of which have a very long history and have included notable memberships. I agree that it is does need attention and development. I will try to contribute some information myself and rasie a discussion about the need for this page to get more attention within the ] --]] 21:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC) | This page should not be speedy deleted because... a good variety of editors have contributed towards the content. The content is potentially very useful as a catalogue of reputable astrological associations, some of which have a very long history and have included notable memberships. I agree that it is does need attention and development. I will try to contribute some information myself and rasie a discussion about the need for this page to get more attention within the ] --]] 21:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| MakeSense64, your arguments hold no water. Rather than trying to make up arguments for achieving your POV, why not (1) cite relevant WP policy or (2) improve the page yourself? You cannot simply delete the page because you wish it so. In other words, try to be constructive and not destructive. ] (]) 01:17, 6 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:17, 6 July 2011
I am nominating this article for speedy deletion. Reasons:
- There is already a WP category page for it http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Astrological_organizations
- The article has no other content.
- This page seems to be used only as a directory for promoting these organizations by giving external links.
- It has been tagged with multiple issues for more than a year, and nothing has been done
MakeSense64 (talk) 11:54, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted because... a good variety of editors have contributed towards the content. The content is potentially very useful as a catalogue of reputable astrological associations, some of which have a very long history and have included notable memberships. I agree that it is does need attention and development. I will try to contribute some information myself and rasie a discussion about the need for this page to get more attention within the WikiProject Astrology discussion area --Zac Δ talk 21:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
MakeSense64, your arguments hold no water. Rather than trying to make up arguments for achieving your POV, why not (1) cite relevant WP policy or (2) improve the page yourself? You cannot simply delete the page because you wish it so. In other words, try to be constructive and not destructive. Aquirata (talk) 01:17, 6 July 2011 (UTC)