| Revision as of 16:08, 16 March 2006 editBhadani (talk | contribs)204,742 edits my reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:46, 16 March 2006 edit undoBhadani (talk | contribs)204,742 edits →[]: thanksNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
| Please see my reply here:<br> http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Bhadani#Samarkand_manuscript. --] 16:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | Please see my reply here:<br> http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Bhadani#Samarkand_manuscript. --] 16:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::I also thank you for your interest in the matter. --] 16:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:46, 16 March 2006
IP
- That would be my ip (the signature's to follow)... please be aware of my report and commentary on Irishpunktom's 3RR violation. CA-Bill 208.201.242.19 00:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hi anon. I would stop using the IP if you are blocked for a 3rr or it may get you a larger one. --a.n.o.n.y.m 00:54, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hello Anon... editor, please call me Bill or CA-Bill. As I have no blocks I intend to continue using this IP. CA-Bill 208.201.242.19 01:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- If it is found out that you are an editor who was blocked for 3rr then that won't be good for you at all. --a.n.o.n.y.m 01:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hello Anon... editor, please call me Bill or CA-Bill. As I have no blocks I intend to continue using this IP. CA-Bill 208.201.242.19 01:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hi anon. I would stop using the IP if you are blocked for a 3rr or it may get you a larger one. --a.n.o.n.y.m 00:54, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Irishpunktom, I have blocked you for violating the 3rr rule. Please sort this out when you come back. --a.n.o.n.y.m 01:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you Anon Editor for doing the right thing when admin User:William_M._Connolley shirked his responsibility. CA-Bill 208.201.242.19 01:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Well Irishpunktom's was not a complete 3rr but I have done this to be fair. --a.n.o.n.y.m 01:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you Anon Editor for doing the right thing when admin User:William_M._Connolley shirked his responsibility. CA-Bill 208.201.242.19 01:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
FYI I'm the one
that posted the original diff's. The anon only re-posted it after william broke blocking policy and ignored it. Seraphim 00:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Your point about the content doesn't matter. 3rr only counts reverts, it doesn't deal with content issues. You might have a very valid point as far as the content goes, but you still broke the 3rr. Seraphim 00:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Re: POV pushing
I realize that there may be some unfairness in such a comment, if one is not prepared to further engage in explanations, debates and arguments to support it. However, in the light of some of the protracted, and repetitive arguments that I have seen you engage in, I must admit... I can't be bothered. Sorry. 11:59, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- That is not what I wrote. Varga Mila 12:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- I simply neither have the time nor desire to get into such discussions, providing many a link and wordy explanations. My last words on this matter.Varga Mila 12:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- That is not what I wrote. Varga Mila 12:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Adab
Please see my reply here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Bhadani#Samarkand_manuscript. --Bhadani 16:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- I also thank you for your interest in the matter. --Bhadani 16:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)