Misplaced Pages

User talk:GoldToeMarionette: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:10, 22 March 2006 editGoldToeMarionette (talk | contribs)120 edits No Harm: - New Harm← Previous edit Revision as of 05:22, 22 March 2006 edit undoGoldToeMarionette (talk | contribs)120 edits Illogical BlockNext edit →
Line 33: Line 33:


::I never edited those pages. Clearly the comment above was intended to be addressed to someone else. ] 23:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC) ::I never edited those pages. Clearly the comment above was intended to be addressed to someone else. ] 23:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

==Block Statement==
Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing.
You were blocked by Hall Monitor for the following reason (see our blocking policy):
"Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "GoldToeMarionette". The reason given for GoldToeMarionette's block is: "sockpuppet used by User:PoolGuy per WP:RFCU results; please s"

On the block list it states:

23:03, 21 March 2006, Hall Monitor (Talk) blocked GoldToeMarionette (contribs) (infinite) (sockpuppet used by User:PoolGuy per WP:RFCU results; please select one username, then email me to have the block removed)

There is no violation of Misplaced Pages policy listed, and the punishment is an (infinite) block. This does not make sense. ] 05:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:22, 22 March 2006

Welcome

Hello, GoldToeMarionette, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 05:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Spamming support for Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Pet_peeves

Spamming afd for support is frowned upon, and viewed as suspicious when coming from a newly created user. OhNoitsJamie 17:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

CheckUser

I only just got CheckUser access a couple of hours ago, and I'm told there's a fair bit of a learning curve in understanding how to use it, so I'm probably not a very good person to be talking to. I'm sorry I can't be of more help at the moment - you might want to approach one of the other people with CheckUser access. Ambi 04:04, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

No Harm

I don't see that anyone did you any harm by investigating and revealing who you were sockpuppeting for. Your behavior was somewhat disruptive. Please don't spam pages trying to drum up votes in the future. Fred Bauder 13:40, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

This is the wrong standard to apply. That is the point I am trying to make. If there is no perceived harm, or if someone does not like something should not be the standards that Admins operate by. The standard for their administrative actions should be an actual violation of Misplaced Pages Policies and Guidelines.
I was unable to find "somewhat disruptive" in Misplaced Pages Policy. I don't know if anyone can cite a policy that has been violated by this account.
In terms of harm there absolutely has been some done. The mere fact that Jayjg investigated this sockpuppet implies that Misplaced Pages Policy was violated. The action of a official of Misplaced Pages to treat as guilty, without an offense being committed, harms my reputation. The sockpuppet reveal is not the harm, the act of investigating it is. GoldToeMarionette 05:04, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
New Harm - Hall_Monitor has blocked me from editing citing this account is a sockpuppet. Sockpuppets in and of themselves are not a violation of Misplaced Pages policy, only when they are used to violate a Misplaced Pages policy. Citing a sockpuppet is therefore not a legitimate reason to block an account. An account block should cite an actual Misplaced Pages policy violation. No one who has read this has yet to come up with one. I am looking forward to this being resolved. GoldToeMarionette 05:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Pet peeve

Please support the examples of Pet peeves you helped create on its talk page and at this page. Thank you. GoldToeMarionette 05:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I never edited those pages. Clearly the comment above was intended to be addressed to someone else. Michael Hardy 23:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Block Statement

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Hall Monitor for the following reason (see our blocking policy): "Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "GoldToeMarionette". The reason given for GoldToeMarionette's block is: "sockpuppet used by User:PoolGuy per WP:RFCU results; please s"

On the block list it states:

23:03, 21 March 2006, Hall Monitor (Talk) blocked GoldToeMarionette (contribs) (infinite) (sockpuppet used by User:PoolGuy per WP:RFCU results; please select one username, then email me to have the block removed)

There is no violation of Misplaced Pages policy listed, and the punishment is an (infinite) block. This does not make sense. GoldToeMarionette 05:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

User talk:GoldToeMarionette: Difference between revisions Add topic