Misplaced Pages

User talk:Altenmann/ar1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Altenmann Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:55, 25 March 2006 editNorbertArthur (talk | contribs)1,511 edits →Romanians← Previous edit Revision as of 14:53, 25 March 2006 edit undo213.139.188.26 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
As I have pointed out before (see ] for my reply to Ghirlandajo), the person filling the ] page with OR is obviously the same Finnish chauvinist who has been problematic in other ways as well (such as changing the name of ] to the Finnish ''Jaakko'' - Finnish nationalists like to pretend that everyone always spoke Finnish in Finland - and making him a "Finnish field marshal", a job that didn't exist before Mannerheim). His editing has been from a couple of recurring IPs and a few different usernames. Personally, I'd like to see his IPs permanently blocked. A checkuser would probably be useful too, just to make sure all usernames really are the same user (the MO has always been the same, as far as I have seen). ] 21:37, 31 January 2006 (UTC) As I have pointed out before (see ] for my reply to Ghirlandajo), the person filling the ] page with OR is obviously the same Finnish chauvinist who has been problematic in other ways as well (such as changing the name of ] to the Finnish ''Jaakko'' - Finnish nationalists like to pretend that everyone always spoke Finnish in Finland - and making him a "Finnish field marshal", a job that didn't exist before Mannerheim). His editing has been from a couple of recurring IPs and a few different usernames. Personally, I'd like to see his IPs permanently blocked. A checkuser would probably be useful too, just to make sure all usernames really are the same user (the MO has always been the same, as far as I have seen). ] 21:37, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


: '''Answer to the above:''' ''In Finnish history books the name is commonly written as ], and there is nothing "chauvinistic" about that. The Finnish family relations of Jaakko De la Gardie are well established for instance through his Finnish grandmother Karin Hansdotter, the mistress of king John III. It is not, however, as certain at all whether or not Sofia Johansdotter (Gyllenhielm) really was the illegitimate daughter of king John III of Sweden, as is often claimed. As we all know, we can determine the mother, but the father is often hard to determine even in the modern times, not to mention the time of Jaakko De la Gardie.
⚫ :Hi Mikkalai. I am growing increasingly irritated by ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] (who also vandalized my user page), ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] who continually paste massive unstructured blocks of prose into the '']'', '']'' and '']'' articles and ] while systematically leaving their comments unsigned and poorly structured. What to do? ''//] 18:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)''


:During the ] Sweden was for long ruled by the Danish King. Nearly all governing officials in Sweden were either Danes or Germans, more so than in Finland. Yet, the few Swedish officials of the period were - and still are -considered "Swedish", eventhough they were governed by the Danes. Similarly, those Finnish officials operating during the period of Sweden-Finland were naturally Finnish, if they were from Finland and of a Finnish descend, regardless what languages they spoke (often that part is hard to fully determine anyway).
⚫ ::I ], brothers. Our pet sockmeister is up to 20 confirmed and 69 suspected, according to the category counts. Let me know if you need more mops on deck. ] 19:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


:Thus, your double standars are astounding, to say the least. You ought to concentrate in viewing history in much more neutral light. Furthermore, that all topled with your totally unnecessary name calling and bad language use lead one to view you as a nationalistic and very one-sided twister of historical facts.
⚫ :::Please, couldn't somebody just ban this person, like last year or something. As I mentioned above, it is not only the ] article, but all kinds of articles concerning Finnish history. Many should really better be deleted and rewritten from scratch. It is all sloppy POV garbage. The following are the usernames I listed on Dbachmann's talkpage a few weeks ago (see link above): {{User|Carolina de la Gardie}}, {{User|Martin Luther}}, {{User|Swedish girl}}, {{User|Variag}}, {{User|Viking Investigator}}, {{User|213.216.199.2}}, {{User|213.216.199.10}}. There is nothing useful coming from these accounts or IPs, and the person is not working on improving the encyclopaedia. Or should we ask for a Checkuser first? ] 20:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


:Finnish Admirals and Field Marshals Horn and Fleming, for instance, famously saved the Swedish Empire - a.k.a. Sweden-Finland - from becoming a part of Denmark.
⚫ ::::''The multiuser in ] article did not violate wikipolicies that warrant blocking. Sockpuppetry is strongly frowned upon, but not totally forbidden, see ]. Of course, Checkuser request is a good idea, just in case, but blocking is not warranted so far. ] ] 20:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)'' <small>(moved from my talkpage. ] 20:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC))</small>


:It should be also noted, that during the period of the autonomous Grand Duchy of Russia the Finnish officials were - and still are - considered Finnish, regardless where they served as generals and/or other officials, i.e. either in Finland or anywhere within the Russian Empire. For instance, in the inauguration ceremony of the last Russian tzar, three of the seven generals of the tzar's personal body guard unit were Finnish. In no history writing they are referred to as Russians.
⚫ :::::Well, that was, more or less, what I told Dbachmann last time (see link above), but it seems a lot of people are wasting time and getting frustrated from this. Well, I removed most of the pages frequented by the user from my watchlist a while ago, so I probably won't get more involved at this point. ] 20:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

:Factual Approach - March 25, 2006''


⚫ ::Hi Mikkalai. I am growing increasingly irritated by ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] (who also vandalized my user page), ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] who continually paste massive unstructured blocks of prose into the '']'', '']'' and '']'' articles and ] while systematically leaving their comments unsigned and poorly structured. What to do? ''//] 18:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)''

⚫ :::I ], brothers. Our pet sockmeister is up to 20 confirmed and 69 suspected, according to the category counts. Let me know if you need more mops on deck. ] 19:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

⚫ ::::Please, couldn't somebody just ban this person, like last year or something. As I mentioned above, it is not only the ] article, but all kinds of articles concerning Finnish history. Many should really better be deleted and rewritten from scratch. It is all sloppy POV garbage. The following are the usernames I listed on Dbachmann's talkpage a few weeks ago (see link above): {{User|Carolina de la Gardie}}, {{User|Martin Luther}}, {{User|Swedish girl}}, {{User|Variag}}, {{User|Viking Investigator}}, {{User|213.216.199.2}}, {{User|213.216.199.10}}. There is nothing useful coming from these accounts or IPs, and the person is not working on improving the encyclopaedia. Or should we ask for a Checkuser first? ] 20:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

⚫ :::::''The multiuser in ] article did not violate wikipolicies that warrant blocking. Sockpuppetry is strongly frowned upon, but not totally forbidden, see ]. Of course, Checkuser request is a good idea, just in case, but blocking is not warranted so far. ] ] 20:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)'' <small>(moved from my talkpage. ] 20:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC))</small>

⚫ ::::::Well, that was, more or less, what I told Dbachmann last time (see link above), but it seems a lot of people are wasting time and getting frustrated from this. Well, I removed most of the pages frequented by the user from my watchlist a while ago, so I probably won't get more involved at this point. ] 20:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


===Alphabetic list=== ===Alphabetic list===

Revision as of 14:53, 25 March 2006

arhiv arhiv 2

Kven

As I have pointed out before (see User talk:Dbachmann#Need_attention for my reply to Ghirlandajo), the person filling the Kven page with OR is obviously the same Finnish chauvinist who has been problematic in other ways as well (such as changing the name of Jacob De la Gardie to the Finnish Jaakko - Finnish nationalists like to pretend that everyone always spoke Finnish in Finland - and making him a "Finnish field marshal", a job that didn't exist before Mannerheim). His editing has been from a couple of recurring IPs and a few different usernames. Personally, I'd like to see his IPs permanently blocked. A checkuser would probably be useful too, just to make sure all usernames really are the same user (the MO has always been the same, as far as I have seen). Tupsharru 21:37, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Answer to the above: In Finnish history books the name is commonly written as Jaakko De la Gardie, and there is nothing "chauvinistic" about that. The Finnish family relations of Jaakko De la Gardie are well established for instance through his Finnish grandmother Karin Hansdotter, the mistress of king John III. It is not, however, as certain at all whether or not Sofia Johansdotter (Gyllenhielm) really was the illegitimate daughter of king John III of Sweden, as is often claimed. As we all know, we can determine the mother, but the father is often hard to determine even in the modern times, not to mention the time of Jaakko De la Gardie.
During the Kalmar Union Sweden was for long ruled by the Danish King. Nearly all governing officials in Sweden were either Danes or Germans, more so than in Finland. Yet, the few Swedish officials of the period were - and still are -considered "Swedish", eventhough they were governed by the Danes. Similarly, those Finnish officials operating during the period of Sweden-Finland were naturally Finnish, if they were from Finland and of a Finnish descend, regardless what languages they spoke (often that part is hard to fully determine anyway).
Thus, your double standars are astounding, to say the least. You ought to concentrate in viewing history in much more neutral light. Furthermore, that all topled with your totally unnecessary name calling and bad language use lead one to view you as a nationalistic and very one-sided twister of historical facts.
Finnish Admirals and Field Marshals Horn and Fleming, for instance, famously saved the Swedish Empire - a.k.a. Sweden-Finland - from becoming a part of Denmark.
It should be also noted, that during the period of the autonomous Grand Duchy of Russia the Finnish officials were - and still are - considered Finnish, regardless where they served as generals and/or other officials, i.e. either in Finland or anywhere within the Russian Empire. For instance, in the inauguration ceremony of the last Russian tzar, three of the seven generals of the tzar's personal body guard unit were Finnish. In no history writing they are referred to as Russians.
Factual Approach - March 25, 2006


Hi Mikkalai. I am growing increasingly irritated by Värmland, Swedish girl, Rumpali, Swärd, Factual approach, Simply not your speciality, Bergen not raining, Judith A., Dan Knapsmith, Drow Ssap, Andreas J., H. Andropov, Roberto A., Johan L. Smith, Annika Berg (who also vandalized my user page), Stop false Swedish Nationalism, Stop false nationalism, Let's refer to distinguished sources, User:213.216.211.69, User:213.216.199.10, User:213.243.182.3 and User:213.216.199.2 who continually paste massive unstructured blocks of prose into the Kven, Prehistoric Finns in Americas and Finnic articles and their talk pages while systematically leaving their comments unsigned and poorly structured. What to do? //Big Adamsky 18:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
I feel your pain, brothers. Our pet sockmeister is up to 20 confirmed and 69 suspected, according to the category counts. Let me know if you need more mops on deck. Just zis Guy you know? 19:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Please, couldn't somebody just ban this person, like last year or something. As I mentioned above, it is not only the Kven article, but all kinds of articles concerning Finnish history. Many should really better be deleted and rewritten from scratch. It is all sloppy POV garbage. The following are the usernames I listed on Dbachmann's talkpage a few weeks ago (see link above): Carolina de la Gardie (talk · contribs), Martin Luther (talk · contribs), Swedish girl (talk · contribs), Variag (talk · contribs), Viking Investigator (talk · contribs), 213.216.199.2 (talk · contribs), 213.216.199.10 (talk · contribs). There is nothing useful coming from these accounts or IPs, and the person is not working on improving the encyclopaedia. Or should we ask for a Checkuser first? Tupsharru 20:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
The multiuser in Kven article did not violate wikipolicies that warrant blocking. Sockpuppetry is strongly frowned upon, but not totally forbidden, see wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Of course, Checkuser request is a good idea, just in case, but blocking is not warranted so far. mikka (t) 20:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC) (moved from my talkpage. Tupsharru 20:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC))
Well, that was, more or less, what I told Dbachmann last time (see link above), but it seems a lot of people are wasting time and getting frustrated from this. Well, I removed most of the pages frequented by the user from my watchlist a while ago, so I probably won't get more involved at this point. Tupsharru 20:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Alphabetic list


The {{vandal}} template seems to be broken, judging from some of the links above. Tupsharru 19:06, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

What makes you think so? I see nothing suspicious. mikka (t) 19:08, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Look at the "page moves" or "block log" links for usernames containing more than one word. The link only searches for part of the name. Tupsharru 19:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
I see. You have to replace SPACE by UNDERSCORE, see Template talk:Vandal. mikka (t) 19:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

All are at Misplaced Pages:Requests for CheckUser#Socks that edit Kven now. mikka (t) 22:24, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Tick

Is it possible to add this image to the ixodidae category ? If so, could you please do that? Thanks in advance. --80.203.59.54 13:54, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Done. mikka (t) 01:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Open proxies

Hi, could you please do something about the Republic of Moldova article? Anons (currently 80.179.227.80 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) once you blocked the previous one) keep turning up (whose IPs, when googled, turn up in open proxy lists ) and are almost certainly Bonapartian socks. --Latinus 22:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

One more question

About the Belarusian emblem article, what happens if the AID fails? What is the next move I can perform? User:Zscout370 00:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you, Mikkalai, I appreciate that. No need to apologize. :-) SlimVirgin 07:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Bonny

He makes personal attacks again. --Ghirla 17:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

What a motivated guy!. --Irpen 20:42, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

I've been figuring out what I did wrong, and I think I managed to track down the other problems and fix them. Thanks! Bz2 19:14, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Donald Knuth

Hi Mikkalai,

you mentioned Knuth's article about computational complexity of songs was reprinted twice in computer science journals. Do you have a reference (or two...) for this article ? I did not know about it and would be interested in having a look (and maybe add the ref to the article, if applicable). Cheers, Schutz 20:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

MoS Overlinking

I did find it at WP:MOS#Wikilinking, but I am not sure how Bobblewik influenced it. However, I will not revert your revert. User:Zscout370 05:14, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey, need to apologize. I am thinking with you and I together, working on this, great progress was made. User:Zscout370 05:41, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

User:Fisss

This guy is a nuisance. He is busily uploading copyvio texts all day, which I'm quite tired to remove. --Ghirla 17:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

The March (1945)

I see that you have modified this article and now refer to it as a Death march. While portions were obviously conducted under the definitions of a Death March (a deliberate attempt to kill some or all of the marchers), the entire march was really a retreat from the advancing Soviet Army. Regards Oldfarm 02:45, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I had not seen the Death marches (Holocaust) article. Regards Oldfarm 03:29, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Minor thoughts of Kvens

It appears to me that user-with-many-handles is more disruptive than constructive?

In particular he violates WP:OWN, harassess other continously, abuses handles, and abuses the talk page. I'd rather we use the normal Wiki-way of letting the article expand itself, and block the user in question for being disruptive, instead of having him continue edit the article.

His contributions are of a very small value, as far as I see it. During my copyedit the last day, I found the same material being repeated again and again, clouded by cryptical tone.

Do you agree with me?`

Fred-Chess 18:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Bible und Muhammed

I have posted a comment on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bible und Muhammed. It would be nice if you could take a look at it. Pecher 21:22, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hadith of Umar's speech of forbidding Mut'ah

Hey. I saw your vote on this AfD and I wanted to challenge it. Why? I will show you. Here is where I explained it to Striver. In short, google search for the title of that article. You only get wikipedia as a result. You will find this for just about all of the hadith articles made by Striver. So, we must ask... why are we using this title? No sources are given for the title so we can only assume that Striver made up the title from looking at the primary source (often his only source in violantion of WP:NOR). I ask you to reconsider your vote because we cannot pretend to be a respectable encyclopedia if we are adding new names for hadith as part of the discourse. We regurgitate material about the subject by scholars in an NPOV fashion. When Striver makes up a title and we vote to keep it we are losing credibility... it's that simple. Yes, hadith may deserve places here like verses of the Bible... we are not a paper encyclopedia... but let's not let that cloud our vision and keep the hadith article under a made up title. We need sources giving us a title and commentaries on that hadith... not merely a link to the hadith itself. gren グレン 09:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Bonny

Check today's edits of user:12.26.76.73 and user:84.179.10.172. --Ghirla 16:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Take a look. --Ghirla 17:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Kven

Hi Mikkalai, I've s-protected it. Cheers, SlimVirgin 19:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey Mikka, please see this (from our "friend") and also this (from me) and share your thoughts. //Big Adamsky 14:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

AID

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Great Leap Forward and Decline of the Roman Empire were selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…
-Litefantastic 00:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Coding by Comrade Reguspatoff

Could you please take look on this? There's no source, Google in English shown nothing but perhaps it is used in Russian. TIA Pavel Vozenilek 02:43, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Fred cleanup

Hello, Mikkalai.

You have marked de disambiguation page Fred as {{disambig-cleanup}}. As I have used this very page to exercite my knowledge on the DAB pages Manual of Style , I wonder what are yours suggestions on what can be changed on that article to meet the styles? Thanks, --Abu Badali 17:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Anti-romanian/Transnistria

in order to diminish the russian POV there do you have some information on the way Ukraine blocked Transnistrian products? Work in this direction not in the anti-romanian one. --Bidon 17:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I will take a look this evening. mikka (t) 17:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Ukraine blocked Transnistrian companies

Ukraine blocked Transnistrian companies to export in Ukraine as of 11 March 2006. In these days this political construction made by the former KGB and sovietic people lives its last days. It will further unite with Moldova and later on with Romania in a United Europe.

Talk:Eastern Front (World War II)

When you have time, please take a look at the page. Now they are going to replace the existing article with a new one, with goofy tables and thoroughly pro-German. As one editor noted, the new version "is also very German-centric. That is, most of the article is written with German intentions or German decisions foremost, and the Soviets are almost offstage in much of the writing. Some of the battle overviews conflict with the specific battle articles - this is especially true with the Kursk campaign summary, which differs sharply with the Kursk article". Unfortunately, as I don't edit Soviet-related topics, I'm not versed in the subject, yet it seems to me that the issue is too significant historically to be edited sloppily. --Ghirla 18:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)


It aint pro-german I have balanced it I made the test page I know what pro german is you should have seen the versions before and the edit war that followed. And there are huge diffrences with my test page and the locked one. That editor who said it is very german centric only wishes to glorify the germans and nothing else dont make comments unless you know the whole story.(Deng 19:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC))

Test page is bad idea in this case. It will be waste of time to go line by line and trace all differences from the privious version. You have to present your changes for discussion one by one. You have insufficient reputation to have your veriosn accepted as a new base. mikka (t) 19:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

You have no idea what you are talking about for months and months I have been fighting check the archives read every post I have made and learn and if you are not willing to do this then you shouldnt comment on anything (Deng 20:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC))

Shestidesyatnik

I was looking for an article on this among different cats and haven't found one. I am surprised you haven't wrote it yet :). Please consider... Thanks! --Irpen 21:08, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

internet phenomenon

hey, thanks for looking around the Internet phenomenon. Just to let you know, a lot of these articles USED to have wikipedia articles, but they were deleted. Many times, they were deleted under the statement that "a listing on the Internet Phenomenon page is good enough." I can vouch for a number of the article you deleted as being very list-worthy.

Just wanted to let you know that "no article, no phenomenon" is not valid for inclusion on this particular list. If you disagree, then maybe we should talk about it on the talk page. I'll start off a conversation there.

Thanks!

Sparsefarce 00:06, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Newbie Question

First off: Thanks for fixing a couple of style errors in my Feathering article. I'm relatively new to wikipedia, and I appreciate my errors being fixed...I learn a bit about Misplaced Pages's etiquette and style every day. Now...you put the "unreferenced" tag on the page. I wrote the article entirely from my knowledge. I assumed it was common knowledge. Should I go and try to find references for each item on the page? If I do, I'm afraid I won't find any information that is any more valid/official than my own knowledge. Is this still worth putting into the article? You did not cite the additional piece of information you added...does this mean that only parts of what I have need references? Thanks again for your help! SearedIce 04:59, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Ukrainophone

Thank you for adding several links to this new article! Kevlar67 22:36, 15 March 2006 (UTC)


Please consult with

Creators and contributors of articles where you perform such drastic deletions. --Molobo 01:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Ok seems appropriate if it won't conceal the information. --Molobo 01:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

:)

"Please keep in mind that the "cite reference" tag is not a threat to you, it is a reminder to all of us that an important element is missing." Yes, I understand...I was seriously just looking for your help. I'm sorry if it sounded like I was accusing you of something... Happy editing, SearedIce 03:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

User:Fisss

This guy seems to be reforming, and yet the pictures he downloads look suspiciously like copyvios to me. Please take a look at the illustrations for his latest articles - Zamoskvoreche, Moscow-City, and Presnya. Thanks for your time, Ghirla 19:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

New sock?

NapoleonBonaparte (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - what do you think? --Latinus 19:52, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Be careful though, as this one actually edits. They are all minor edits though ;-) --Latinus 21:17, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
We're talking about really silly edits like this - linking to a redirect to the same article. --Latinus 21:18, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
A typical pre-planted sock. mikka (t) 21:27, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Don't you think that User:Bonaparte/sockpuppetry should be moved to Misplaced Pages:Long term abuse/Bonaparte? This is what we did with Roitr's socks when he got so odious (Misplaced Pages:Long term abuse/Roitr). --Latinus 21:31, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I have already listed bonaparte in Misplaced Pages:Long term abuse]mikka (t) 21:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Silicone holocaust

Good call on the Silicone holocaust article, it really doesn't belong on Misplaced Pages. Your reasons for deletion, although valid, are not phrased exceptionally well, which makes it somewhat hard to understand. It would be generally appreciated if you were to take more care in writting such explanations in the future. Happy editing. Bobby1011 02:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

user:Alucard sepetdalv

Hi! You have blocked user:Alucard sepetdalv. That user seems to be unhappy about that. He is asking for help from Meta-admins (meta:User_talk:Angela#Admin_abuse) and requested a checkuser check (meta:Talk:Request_for_CheckUser_information#removed_2006-03-19). This problem does not fall under the jurisdiction of Meta-admins or stewards. This is a local EN wikipedia matter.

Can you please explain to this user what his options are for appealing your block according EN Misplaced Pages policy and where and how he can do that? You can put it on his talk page of his meta-account: meta:User talk:Alucard sepetdalv Thanks, --Walter 15:13, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Serbophobia

Your opinion would be appreciated here regarding the deletion of the article Serbophobia. Thanks, Asterion 20:33, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

User:Excaliburo

Now user User:Excaliburo is also complaining about his block. See meta:User_talk:Datrio#this_is_also_my_case (meta:User:Excaliburo ) I have done on meta a checkuser for there edits on meta and Excaliburo and Alucard sepetdalv and there are using IP's form to different continents. Please be sure about what you are doing and inform this user how to appeal your block. --Walter 21:00, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Images

Hey you deleted all the pictures that I uploaded but I am the author of those pics, all the pics come from euro-caspian.com and I am the owner of that site. So please restore all the pics back to their original state. How do you want me to proof to you that I am really the owner? Do you perhaps want me to make a new page in that site with your comment in it as proof? Baku87 23:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)Baku87

Removal of Prod Tag on Infernal Machine article

Your recent edit of the Infernal Machine article removed a prod tag I had placed there. Did you read the Talk:Infernal machine where I had explained my action? Why did you not provide an edit summary of your removal as per the guideline on the tag: that is: "To avoid confusion, you are encouraged to explain the reason for removal in the edit summary."? I do not gather from your talk page arguemnts that you disagree that it is a probable copyvio but I understand you have not come up with the evidence that it is inddeed a copyvio. How do you suggest we resolve if not going through a deletion process. Why do you seek to make the deletion process more convoluted?--A Y Arktos 08:22, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

  • The reason I placed the prod tag there is because in my opinion the article cannot be deleted as a copyvio. I had gone to do just that and there is in fact no evidence on the intenret that it is a copyvio. The orginal contributer has not asserted it is a copyvio. There is no web based text that matches it. On what basis then would you delete it as a copyvio? When you remove a prod tag next time, please read ther talk page and plaease provide a reason. The article must now go to AfD.--A Y Arktos 19:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Molobo alert

Molobo at his trolling best. --Ghirla 09:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

History of Belarus

Why the revert? The section needs beefing up, a second link would be helpful for starters. Ksenon 17:45, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

You don't have to "beef up" a summary article of the whole long history of Belarus by secondary details. This particular section is already big enough, in proportion to the whole history of Belarus. mikka (t) 20:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Russian jokes

Why didn't you like the joke about the KPSS? It was both Russian (in language) and Soviet (in its subject). And showed people's attitude toward the Communist Party members very well. May be it can be put somewhere else?

This is not a jokebook. There are thousands of possible political Russian jokes. This one requires too much explanation. the political section is largest already. mikka (t) 20:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Need help with a POV-pusher

Hey Mikkalai,

I really need your help on the Abkhazia page with a pro-Georgian POV-pusher. He's not Georgian (not that it matters), but he continues to attempt to add his own bias to the article. He has cited works such as "History of the Georgian people" and "Making of Georgian Nation"... See the talk page for more information. Thanks. --Khoikhoi 21:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

National Emblem of Belarus removed from AID

So, what can I do now since this article has pretty much no chance of making AID? Send it to peer review again? User:Zscout370 23:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Dear Mr mikka, Thanks for your welcoming. Actually those images belong to IAG (International Action Group) Abkhazeti, which gave me authority to use them freely only for web sites. Please let me know if you need official conformation from them.

As for neutrality, we must not forget the facts and truthfulness of these conflicts. I promise to be fair, nutral and always use valid and reliable sources when editing or contributin anything to Wiki.

Thanks for your warm welcome and withing you all the bestNoxchi Borz 22:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

one contributor

Pryvitannie, Mikka. Just wanted to point this out: Misplaced Pages contributor Kuban coSSack's talking about dictatorial ruler Lukashenka (who massively and monstrously falsified the vote) and today's storming of the October square, when hundreds of special police arrested peaceful demonstrators, totally destoryed the camp, threw empty vodka bottles into the mess and videotaped that for Belarusan state television. Here's Kuban coSSack's comment about this police action and break-up of a peaceful protest, which took place at 3AM so that there would be no witnesses of their activity:

Dear fellow Wikipedians, do you understand that the only purpose of his contributions on articles about Belarus (such as Belarusian language, Belarusian history, Belarus, etc.) is to push Russian imperial POV and lies? Please, see history and talk pages of the Belarus-related articles. Should WP community do something about it? --rydel 16:38, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


Romanians

Hello Mikkalai! I jts want to tell you that the Romanian estimation of USA is around 1.2 million. The official figures are suggested to be there, but the estimation are there too !!! If you already looked there, there are put 1.2 mil. Romanians in USA, along with the 367.000. I suggest you if you want more informations, to go here : talk:Romanians

Regards, User:NorbertArthur March 24 2006

User talk:Altenmann/ar1: Difference between revisions Add topic