| Revision as of 13:54, 11 August 2008 editタチコマ robot (talk | contribs)161,093 editsm moved Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/Blue Dragonfly to Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg: Robot: FPC standardization← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:32, 26 December 2011 edit undoΔ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers35,263 editsm adjusting filename after renameNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {| align=right | {| align=right | ||
| |] | |] | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| |] | |] | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Two great images (sorry Solipsist :-) ), of a Blue Dragonfly. | Two great images (sorry Solipsist :-) ), of a Blue Dragonfly. | ||
| * '''Support'''. Self Nom. --] 07:55, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC) | * '''Support'''. Self Nom. --] 07:55, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Support #1''' ] -- ] ] 11:35, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC) | *'''Support #1''' ] -- ] ] 11:35, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *I'd '''support #1''' ] if it appeared in an article. —] (]) 15:09, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC) | *I'd '''support #1''' ] if it appeared in an article. —] (]) 15:09, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC) | ||
| **See #1 in ] - ] 16:41, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC) | **See #1 in ] - ] 16:41, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Support''' when placed in a proper article. -- <span class="plainlinks"><small>]]</small> 17:50, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC) | *'''Support''' when placed in a proper article. -- <span class="plainlinks"><small>]]</small> 17:50, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:32, 26 December 2011
Australian Blue Dragonfly
 |
Two great images (sorry Solipsist :-) ), of a Blue Dragonfly.
- Support. Self Nom. --Fir0002 07:55, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support #1 Image:Male Blue Dragonfly Australia.jpg -- Chris 73 Talk 11:35, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
- I'd support #1 Image:Male Blue Dragonfly Australia.jpg if it appeared in an article. —Korath (Talk) 15:09, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Support when placed in a proper article. -- BRIAN0918 17:50, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support if it meets the criterion of illustrating an article. Denni☯ 02:10, 2005 Mar 4 (UTC)
- Support I support the first one, the second one isn't quite as good. But I'm generally quite impressed. G-Man 22:24, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support The first one is an awesome shot - agree with G-man. -Lommer | 01:20, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support only the first one. The second shot could use some enhancing. JoJan 17:18, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support #1 - Bevo 16:41, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support either. Nice pictures. But is there a higher resolution version? --jacobolus (t) 23:45, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Promoted: +10 / - 0 -- Solipsist 20:23, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
